Testeachersonline for series 7
5 RepliesJump to last post
Hi all, I did a search before posting to inquire as to testeachersonline so please don't hang me. In 2009 I was captive for SF so I took my insurance licenses as well as my 6 and 63 with testeachersonline, I think I scored very well for my investment licenses better than my insurance licenses (all things market have always been more interesting to me)
I am looking to take my series 7, i understand this exam to be much more comprehensive than any exam I have done before, so more mature content like kaplan or stc is calling my name but being that I have to pay this on my own for $120 with testeachers with previous good results they are a contender.
I just don't want to sell myself short and not pass on the first attempt.
any previous takers with them solely
If you spend the extra money on training consultants material (full online access, lectures, book etc) and you put enough time in to study (2-3 hours on weeknights, 3-5 hours on weekends for about 3 months) there is no way you will not pass. If I can do it, so can you
I will give testeachers a try and report back how it went…their testimonials page for series 7 is impressive
I used PassPerfect for my Series 7 last April 2014 and passed my first try!
I used Training Consultants for my Series 9 & 10 & were excellent! passed!
My friend used Training Consultants for her Series 66 and also passed!
Very easy to read material & the lectures are concise.
It has been my experience with all of the tests though that they cannot possibly know exactly how the exam will be structured - each exam is different and the bank is constantly pooling from thousands of questions.
I used test teachers online for the series 7 and for understanding the material it was excellent but the practice questions were nowhere near what they were on the exam I also purchased training consultants question bank and they had questions that were very similar to the test so id say the training consultant was probably more helpful to passing my exam.