Skip navigation
digital donation charity philanthropy tashatuvango/iStock/Thinkstock

Pressure Builds to Expand Charitable Deductions

The Initiative to Accelerate Charitable Giving is advocating changes to private foundations and donor-advised funds.

Over $1.1 trillion currently sits in private foundations (PFs) and donor-advised funds (DAFs) in the United States.

These two charitable intermediary tools have grown tremendously in recent years, fueled by tax-deductible contributions for the wealthiest of Americans. By 2019, 12.7% of all individual giving went to DAFs and an additional 15.1% went to PFs—more than 500% growth in individual giving to these warehouse/intermediaries over the past 30 years.

While PFs and DAFs amass huge sums of money, demands on nonprofits to provide essential social services have skyrocketed. Despite the growing need and increased contributions to foundations and DAFs, average giving to charity in the United States has remained constant for 40 years at roughly 2% of disposable income.

Donors who make contributions to PFs or DAFs receive an immediate tax deduction. A well-planned donation from the wealthiest Americans can save those donors (in tax deductions) up to 74% of the value of the donation. Due to 2017 changes in tax laws, this privilege is available only to the wealthiest, leaving the remaining taxpayers to pick up the tab.

Facts to Consider

  • Although PFs are required annually to distribute 5% of their assets, there’s no requirement that those payouts go to charities. Under current law, PFs can satisfy the 5% rule by paying salaries, administrative and travel expenses (often to family members), by making program-related investments in for-profit companies and by making contributions to DAFs.
  • There’s no DAF payout requirement at all! Over $140 billion sits in tax-advantaged DAFs without any assurance that it will go to charity in any time frame.
  • Although DAF supporters argue that they have high payout rates to charities, these numbers are misleading and inflated. Some DAF accounts donate 100%, while a fourth of DAFs donate less than 5% and some nothing at all. Moreover, the numbers include DAF-to-DAF donations—resulting in no benefit to working charities.

Movement to Change Giving Rules

At a time when demands on charities are greater than at any time in memory, and local, state and federal governments are straining to meet the needs of a society with growing income inequality, the movement to change the giving rules in the United States is growing.

The Initiative to Accelerate Charitable Giving (IACG) has been formed to advocate for changes that could significantly increase and accelerate the resources flowing to charities. The bipartisan organization has proposed some common-sense changes in the tax laws to accomplish three broad goals:

  1. For PFs, close loopholes to better ensure that distributions qualifying for the payout requirement are available to charities and incentivize greater and earlier payouts through reforms to the excise tax. Under these proposals, PFs couldn’t meet their 5% payout obligation by paying salaries or travel expenses of PF family members (or circular donations to DAFs). They would also encourage greater payouts by eliminating the excise tax on PFs that pay out more than 7% a year, or all of their assets, within 25 years.
  1. For DAFs, adopt measures to make sure that donations are distributed to charities within a reasonable period. The biggest change would be to offer DAF donors a choice between delaying the income tax deduction (but not the capital gains or estate and gift tax savings) until money has left the fund for a real charity or taking the deduction immediately but committing to distribute the money within 15 years.
  1. For individuals, incentivize greater giving by expanding and extending the new non-itemizer charitable deduction to more taxpayers.

Two key U.S. senators (Grassley and King) have very recently introduced legislation that closely tracks the IACG proposals.

Professor Ray Madoff, director of the Forum on Philanthropy and the Public Good at the Boston College Law School, and one of the founders of IACG, sums up the proposals this way,

We count on charities to fulfill essential functions of society, and charitable tax rules to encourage the flow of money from donors to charities. Unfortunately, workarounds have been created so that taxpayers are able to get all of the tax benefits of charitable giving with no assurance that those funds will ever make their way to working charities. The effect of this is empty deductions—costing the government significant revenue and producing no certain public benefit. These proposals close these loopholes and bring charities back to the center of charitable tax rules.”

Regular readers of this column know that I’m a huge supporter of both foundations and DAFs—when they actually get money to working charities. These suggested tax law reforms are the first modest, yet significant, steps to help our charity system achieve its intended goals.


Bruce DeBoskey, J.D., is a philanthropic strategist working across the United States with The DeBoskey Group to help families, businesses, foundations, and family offices design and implement thoughtful philanthropic strategies and actionable plans. He is a frequent keynote speaker at conferences and workshops on philanthropy. Visit or @BDeBo on Twitter.

Hide comments


  • Allowed HTML tags: <em> <strong> <blockquote> <br> <p>

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.