Open Letter to FINRA
4 RepliesJump to last post
http://www.brokeandbroker.com/index.php?a=blog&id=143<?: prefix = o ns = "urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" />
<?: prefix = v ns = "urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml" />
An irreverent Wall Street Blog
by Bill Singer
Subscribe to RSS Feed:
Blog Home | Past Entries
Open Letter to FINRA: The Last Tango?
Written: March 5, 2009
Readers of this blog write to me with ideas about how to improve Wall Street's regulation and with complaints about its failures. The voices of the independent and regional FINRA community -- both owners and registered persons -- express frustration with inept rulemaking, ineffective regulation, and the perception that regulation has long been biased in favor of the larger firms and high-profile players who brought much of the present economic devastation upon our heads. I am flattered to read my mail when it says that I am viewed as a credible advocate for regulatory reforms to protect both the public and the industry. Sadly, it pains me to explain to such folks that I am disheartened by years of dealing with regulators and trade groups who chose to play organizational politics at the expense of investors and industry participants. There is an untapped reservoir of talent among the ranks of FINRA's member firms and registered persons, and it's time that we opened the spigot and took advantage of their ideas and expertise.
One last time, and in response to popular demand, I am reaching out to the powers that be at FINRA. I submit for your consideration the verbatim version of the email that I sent to FINRA on March 5, 2009. I will advise you of any reply.
Email: [email protected]
TO: Nancy Condon
DATE: March 5, 2009
I write to you solely in my personal capacity and with the hope that you will direct this correspondence to the individuals noted.
In 1998, I was one of the first four candidates to force a contested election for the NASD Board. In the ensuing years, I founded and counseled what the press often refers to as the FINRA (formerly NASD) Dissident Movement. Others have nurtured a separate coalition that is frequently referred to as the FINRA Reform Movement. Given that those two factions often make common cause, my preference is to refer to the “Dissident/Reform” Movement.
The true vision of self-regulation cannot exist in an atmosphere of isolation and intimidation – be that real or perceived. Today, many FINRA member firms and registered persons believe that any public criticism of FINRA elicits regulatory retaliation. Thus, the perception is that dialog is discouraged, if not threatened.
FINRA refuses to engage in meaningful dialog with the Dissident/Reform Movement. The closed lines of communication radicalize industry opposition by marginalizing the voices of moderation. The persistent strained relationship undermines FINRA’s credibility and effectiveness by inhibiting the industry’s full cooperation and confidence.
The Dissident/Reform Movement seeks a confidential meeting with FINRA senior management and appropriate representatives of FINRA’s Board. It is time to rebuild the consensus within the FINRA community and to restore the partnership between the regulator and the regulated. Can we take this historic step towards restoring the consensus that makes for more effective regulation?
Send this to:
Thanks, Bill. I picture a bunch of guys sitting in a fancy meeting making the rules, and another bunch of guys out in the parking lot, rolling cardboard boxes on hand trucks out of their empty little solo offices. As usual, the "mass affluent" investors get hosed, with the loss of their advisor and the unsustainable overall cost of doing business.
Don’t let the bastards grind you down, Bill!
The bright spot of the last couple weeks has been you fighting the good fight!