Skip navigation
Rothschild_518

Alaska Supreme Court Invalidates Exclusive Jurisdiction Provision

A recent decision allows Montana fraudulent transfer finding to affect protections of a self-settled trust.

Section 34.40.110(k) of the Alaska Trust Act purports to grant Alaska courts exclusive jurisdiction over an action brought to avoid, as a fraudulent transfer, a transfer of property to an Alaska self-settled spendthrift trust.1 At its core, the statute provides that “[a] court of this state has exclusive jurisdiction over an action brought under a cause of action or claim for relief that is based on a transfer of property to a trust that is the subject of this section.”

ARTICLE ACCESS REQUIRED

Please Log in if you are currently a Trust&Estates subscriber, or select DAYPASS for our new 24 hour access (nominal fee required).


If you are interested in unlimited article access for one year, please select Annual Subscription below.

Hide comments

Comments

  • Allowed HTML tags: <em> <strong> <blockquote> <br> <p>

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
Publish