Personal Retirement Advisory
Ron Wyden

Ron Wyden

Wyden Bill Both Widens and Narrows Retirement Benefits Rules

Practitioners should be aware of many newly minted provisions

U.S. Senator Ron Wyden (D-Ore.) has marked up a bill profoundly affecting retirement benefits, principally individual retirement accounts. It has yet to be considered and so has no Senate bill number. Imposition of the five-year rule and elimination of the stretch has been proposed in the past. This bill contains many other newly minted provisions.

Here’s a rundown of the proposed bill:

Roth IRAs

After Dec. 31, 2016, all Roth IRA conversions would be eliminated. 

After Dec. 31, 2016, contributions to Roth IRAs would be barred when the total balance of all of an individual’s Roth IRAs is over $5 million, adjusted for inflation. If the Dec. 31, 2016 aggregate value is greater than $5 million, that value will be the cap, as adjusted for inflation, instead of $5 million. Contributions may be made to reach the cap.

Example 1: Ronald’s two Roth IRAs total $4.5 million on Dec. 31, 2016. He may make Roth IRA contributions each year, until the year-end account value reaches $5 million, as adjusted for the cost of living index (COLI).

Example 2: Olga’s three Roth IRAs total $6 million on Dec. 31, 2016. She may not make Roth IRA contributions unless the year-end account value dips below $6 million, as adjusted for the COLI.

Any amount determined to be an excess contribution is subject to the 15 percent excise tax on excess contributions, until removed from the account.1

If the balance exceeds the cap, half of the excess is a required minimum distribution (RMD), subject to the 50 percent excise tax on failure to make RMDs.2 Effectively, the tax is 25 percent of the excess balance.

Distribution of an excess balance won’t be subject to the 10 percent tax on pre-age 59 ½ withdrawals.

Roth individual retirement annuities would be valued using actuarial factors. Rollovers of distributions occurring before Dec. 1 but completed after Dec. 31 are counted in the year-end valuation.

MYRAs

For low-earners, the government would match up to 50 percent of retirement contributions by providing a refundable tax credit, up to $1,000. The credit would be paid directly into the taxpayer’s retirement account—the taxpayer wouldn’t receive a check. The government’s contribution won’t be taxable income and won’t be counted towards income limitations on contributions to other retirement accounts.

The credit would be phased out as adjusted gross income approaches an “applicable dollar amount,” based on filing status.

To qualify for the credit, contributions must be made to a myRA or to a Roth IRA that accepts such contributions.

Age Limit Repeal

There would be no maximum age beyond which IRA contributions can’t be made.

Non-Spouse 60-day Rollovers

Effective after Dec. 31, 2016, rollovers within 60 days of distribution from a decedent’s retirement account could be made to an inherited IRA. Because the transferee IRA is an inherited IRA, RMDs would be made over the inheritor’s life expectancy, beginning the year after the plan participant’s or IRA owner’s year of death.

Likewise 60-day rollovers of any distribution from an inherited IRA to another inherited IRA would be allowed. Presumably, the one-rollover-per- year rule would apply to all IRAs, whether or not inherited.

Student Loan Payments

Student loan payments would receive IRA matching contributions from the government, paid into a myIRA.

Lifetime RMDs

Those with account balances under $150,000 don’t need to make RMDs. This exception doesn’t apply to inherited retirement benefits.

For all others, the age for determining an individual’s required beginning date will be raised above age 70 ½ to age 71 in 2018. It will be raised to age 72 beginning in 2023. After 2028, it will be pegged to mortality tables.

Beneficiaries’ RMDs

For beneficiaries, all inherited accounts must be fully distributed by Dec. 31 of the fifth year following the year of the employee or IRA owner’s death, with exceptions for: surviving spouses and minor children of the employee or IRA owner; disabled or chronically ill individuals; and any person who’s the decedent’s junior by 10 years or less.

Post-2016 successor beneficiaries of inherited IRAs will be subject to the new rules, even though the account wasn’t inherited by the initial beneficiary before the proposed law’s effective date.

Several other exceptions could apply for collective bargaining units, governmental plans (but only until Jan 1. 2019) and certain annuities. There’s no exception for trusts, which will always be subject to the five-year rule.

Valuation

Qualified valuations of property other than marketable securities and cash are required. The standard of valuation for claiming the income tax deduction for property donated to charities would apply.

Restriction on Investments

IRAs won’t be able to invest in entities when the IRA owner owns a substantial portion of the entity, to include a corporation, partnership or other unincorporated enterprise or trust or estate.

The ownership threshold would be 10 percent, and family attribution rules would apply.

The IRA would lose its income tax exemption if it runs afoul of this rule, causing immediate income taxation of the entire account as of Jan. 1.

Prohibited Transactions

IRA owners would be a disqualified person for purposes of prohibited transactions.

Statute of Limitations

The statute of limitations would be extended to six years for misreporting valuations, as well as for acts that constitute prohibited transactions.

Planning

Anecdotal evidence suggests that most smaller accounts are taxed soon after inheritance. Good planning can mean leaving retirement benefits to a trust to assure that tax deferral is likely to occur. Yet, the proposed bill leaves no room for trusts to enjoy tax deferral beyond five years.

Larger accounts can realize significant tax deferral benefits for family members, other than spouses, by including charitable beneficiaries. That will occur if the beneficiary of the retirement account is a charitable remainder trust. The value of family after-tax benefits over the term of the trust can greatly exceed the value that would be realized under the Wyden bill.

Bottom line: The bill would add enormous complexity and might not raise significant new revenues, because scoring the bill on the premise that all beneficiaries will maximize tax deferral may be unrealistic.

Endnotes

1. Internal Revenue Code Section 4973.

2. IRC Section 4974.

 

 

Hide comments

Comments

  • Allowed HTML tags: <em> <strong> <blockquote> <br> <p>

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
Publish