Skip navigation

BAI/ML FA's shared info

or Register to post new content in the forum

131 RepliesJump to last post

 

Comments

  • Allowed HTML tags: <em> <strong> <blockquote> <br> <p>

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
May 20, 2009 3:32 am

[quote=ML for Life]I met my WM from BOA and he’s a great guy. He’s smart, hardworking, and knows how to play the game. We’ve referred about 4 mortgages and approx. 1mil in CD assets to him already. I’ve completely embraced this new option for our business. The ML world as we know it isn’t changing…it has changed. So either jump on board or get left behind. My WM knows he’s part of my team now and I know he will help me navigate through the BOA system from the inside. My Branch Manager actually tapped me today to speak to the our local BAI advisors in June and give them some insight on how a ML rep operates. This could be a real good thing if its handled right.

PS-The referrals would be nice but no one's tongue is hanging out waiting for them.[/quote] CM Hardworking? That's a joke! They are all about widgets and hitting their numbers and then leaving by noon. Never met one that actually "worked". This includes the new Bank specialists that are the cream of the crap. BAI reps will simply be abosrbed into ML or become referral sources to ML reps. BofA is doing what has never been done before and for good reason. They are marrying Bank/Brokerage and will live or die by the sword. In the past large banks have always kept the 2 platforms seperate so they could spin off ala Smith Barney in the event of a problem. This will not be the case with ML. Enjoy Kenny boy!
May 20, 2009 4:11 am

Bonehead:  Sorry you couldn’t make it in the POA/PMD training program. 

May 20, 2009 9:32 pm

ML,



I’m happy your new partnership is working out and you have a positive attitude (I’m not being sarcastic).



Beware, however of referring mortgages to your partner. I have 6 mortgages from my clients that have been the biggest disaster. Most of them were applied for before March and still have not yet closed. For your own good (to keep your investment relationships), I would tread lightly and wait to see if those mortgages go through smoothly.



I can’t tell you how bad B of A is right now with underwriting mortgages. I’ve had to tell some of my clients to refinance elsewhere.

May 20, 2009 11:54 pm

I think the new title is WMB (Wealth Management Banker) not WM's.  My old CM is still around and his attitude has completely changed.  For the ones that made the cut I can say they are very happy now that they do not have to deal with all the service calls.  I believe some of them will get the new roll.  I can confirm they did not manage any investable assets unless you consider CD and investment.......<?: prefix = o ns = "urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" />

The one thing I am seeing and hearing is that the ML FA's are excited about having that WMB’s in their office to help them close loans and to navigate the bank.  The BAI folks are happy to get the technology and (crossing fingers) the comp plan.  The more I look at this the more it seems to be a good deal for all.  The ML guys never needed referrals so it's business as usual.  For us BAI folks this is a major upgrade and oh well if I need to source my own business I never got DIRT from my CM anyways so it business as usaual for me.  Also, I opened up tons of those crappy MRA accounts and guess what...I'm now getting all the maturing CD's emailed to me with a BIG red bow on them.  We never had it so good.

May 21, 2009 1:46 am
Sellout21:

Bonehead: Sorry you couldn’t make it in the POA/PMD training program.



I have no idea what a POA or PMD is and I haven't been in a training program in years. I can make it anywhere, the question is where I choose to make it. Do I want to sit around and wait for some lawyer (Brian Moynahan) who has never been an FA in his life and has no freakin clue what we do everyday, to decide how I will run my business. Or do I want to control my own fate and that of my clients?

Some people lead and some follow. Look inside yourself Sellout. It's okay to be a follower, just know your place in the world and stay out of our way.
May 21, 2009 3:42 am

Oh boy, a maturing CD list? How much do you get paid on the roll?

May 21, 2009 9:35 pm

Walehunter- Your not the sharpest tool in shed are you.  Can someone please educate this guy on why you would want access to a maturing CD list.........?  I can't even answer his question because it's so retarded.

May 22, 2009 1:56 am

Yeah, all those CD buyers are lineing up for CSG!

May 22, 2009 2:30 am

Bonehead:  I’m not going to get into a pissing contest with you, but making comments like “Thundering Turd” is just ridiculous.  I’ve been in this business for quite a long time, and have been with an IBD, Regional, and now ML.  This notion that you can’t be an entrepreneur at a wire and that you’re treated like a robot is simply nonsense.  And as far as doing what’s right for your clients…who do you think has the best investment platform, technology, research, and breadth of services?  Wirehouses do. 

I'm not saying advisors can't run a good practice outside of a wire, but thinking you can individually do a better job than the vast resources and talent of a place like ML is kidding yourself.  If you have more than $100M in AUM, I can tell you from experience there's no better place than a wire as an advisor and for higher net worth clients.    
May 22, 2009 3:30 am

The only argument an IAR or RIA could make is that they keep more of the money they bring in.  They may have great customer service models, but that can be duplicated and then some at a wire.  You can’t honestly tell me they bring better products, services, reporting/technology, and research to their clients, especially higher net worth clients?  Why do you think the vast majority of the wealthiest people in the world do business with the big wires?  I can tell you it’s not just b/c they can get you a credit card or a mortgage. 

Again, I am by no means bashing independents - I've been there.  I just think it's naive to believe they are on the same playing field in what they can bring to a client.  I also think the independent channel is getting saturated with 4th and 5th quintile producers being forced out by wires.  Independents have gained a lot of momentum over the past few years, but many of these lower producers should be looking for new careers, not starting their own shop out of their house and bashing their former employers on this site.  The barriers to entry are too lenient, and it's going to continue to hurt the integrity of the industry as a whole.    
Jun 4, 2009 1:03 am

Looks like more sh*t will be hitting the fan shortly.   Insiders saying Sontag is being ousted at ML. Anyone hearing this.





Bank Of America Denies Our Merrill Shakeup Story (BAC)

http://shar.es/bfQ4

Jun 8, 2009 6:48 pm

Sellout a few points to your wirehouses are the best way for the HNW segment.  First you are correct in that the overwhelming vast majority of the UHNW as in 10$ milliion investable assets and up is served by old line Trust companies like Northern, Bessemer.  Investment banks like Goldman, CS, ML PBIG, UBS PB etc.  As well as established RIA’s, and on a much smaller scale the top of the top independents.  However you stated HNW which to most means on a low end 1$ milliion or 3$ million in investable assets.  This market is most certainly not where wirehouses are the best.  They are good no doubt but tons of adviosrs whether they are RIA, IBD Wirehouse, Regional, etc. do well in this segment.  If the wirehouses were so great then why is there a record number of “breakaway” brokers going to established RIA’s, or starting their own or leaving the wirehouse?  Like most wirehouse reps you erroneously think that the name on your card is what a client cares about, ignoring the relationship, which is what this business has and will always be about it?  To quote Chris Gardner"  This business is all about relationships and those can’t be bought"  Next time you make a blanket statement do several things:  First review what you are about to write and make sure it is what you want to say.  Two have detailed, exact information that supports your argument.  Saying things like the vast majority of the wealthiest people in the world do business with big wires really doesn’t validate your argument at all.  Saying something like forty percent of the Forbes 400 is served by ML would actually help you in your argument.   Third understand that most advisors on this forum are not in the UHNW market.  PW advisors are typically paid a salary with a bonus on large teams, and have leads either fed to them by a bank or have a couple of senior team leaders that brought in the business.  It is great that you love the wire but don’t insult those of us who are successfull with your HNW marketplace and act like we are naive to think we can compete with ML etc. Fourth please keep your attitude because wirehouse advisors like you who continue to think that if your not at a wirehouse and can’t do what you do are great for my business!

Jun 8, 2009 8:14 pm

Last

Jun 10, 2009 4:30 am
A record # of brokers are leaving wires b/c they felt they were 'entitled' to retention bonuses and didn't get them.  They are ticked off, want to blame it on the firm, and feel they are not appreciated.  It has NOTHING to do with what's best for the client.  I'm trying to bring some objectivity to this forum.  I work for a wire, but don't love everything about it.  If you can do over $750k at a wire you will be successful going forward at any other firm; independent, regional, bank, or wire.     Look at it like college sports, which seems to be a big issue on this thread:  Working for a wire is Division 1, while the independents are D3.  It doesn't mean you can't have some good players and good teams in D3, but the overwhelming vast majority would get crushed by D1 squads.  Not all D1 players are better than all D3 players....you do have some guys that were overlooked in recruiting and slipped past D1 scouts coming out of high school.     
Jun 11, 2009 4:40 pm

Sell I like your sports analogy and you are correct in that a lot of the small Indy shops, insurance shops etc.  wouldn’t be able to compete with an experienced wirehouse broker for a high end HNW client.  But advisors at those places will have clients like that at every shop because they have a relationship with them.  I think a better sports analogy would be to look at the wires as the conferences like the Pac 10, ACC, Big 12.  Etc.  Indy, Regionals play at the same level but in a conference like the WAC or Mtn. West.  Can a top WAC team beat a powerhouse?  Absolutely look at BSU in the fiesta bowl a few years back!  The point is there are successfull advisors at every firm with high end clients they just might not have as many with a two milion dollar account.

Jun 11, 2009 6:26 pm

Well sports fans.

 I would consider a wirehouse firm a lot like the WWF World Wrestling foundation. It is a make believe world.   In the end the wrestlers make money but get hurt or crippled by the end of there career.   They are good actors and athletes but sometimes drug induced.   They talk a lot and brag how great they are. But in the end they are an income source for the WWF and will disappear  when they do not perform.     They put on a good show but no one really believes in them.  
Jun 11, 2009 7:31 pm

Whoops should read World Wrestling  Federation.

Jun 11, 2009 11:56 pm

I’ve always said that there are some very solid individual independents out there, and they can run a very strong business working with clients < $500k - $1M.  To use the college conference analogy…it’s like pulling for the 13-16 seeds in March Madness.  Everyone wants to see the upset, and they do occasionally happen, but the odds are not in their favor.  We may be seeing more parody amongst the college programs, much like the brokerage world, but there is not some seismic shift taking place.  Oklahoma would beat Boise State 9 out of 10 times they play, but everyone remembers the upsets…ala David vs. Goliath.

Jun 12, 2009 3:37 am

[quote=Borker Boy] Why don’t BAI and Merrill guys just move to Edward Jones?



After all this mess, are we still considered inferior?[/quote]



Funny thing is, it seems that rumors and media misconceptions are driving this thought.



As a ML FA, I can say without reservation that this BAC/ML merger has had ZERO effect on my business. If anything, it opens a few more doors. We’re expecting some leads (read, people we had no contact with before). As an FA, I can choose whether they fit into my practice or not.



Our banking and lending capabilities will only grow stronger.



Our investment platform will not change.



This is really just status quo for everyone. I really wish that people who are looking in from the outside would refrain from commenting on a situation that they have no real knowledge of. It would be just as unfair for me to comment on the situation going on over at Morgan Stanley Smith Barney. Personally, after years of thinking of these two firms as separate entities, I just hope they change their name one day. The whole MS SB thing almost feels like someone is incorrectly labeling the firm. Still, they are bringing together two great firms and I’m sure they’ll figure things out.



The ultimate kicker is that as FA’s, we are “business owners” and our clients are what drive us. As long as our advice to them prevails and the platform we have to work from enables us to provide the best possible means of attaining their goals, what does all the bickering in upper management have to do with anything?
Jun 12, 2009 6:14 pm

Wildcat,

  You sound like a real company man.   Hang in there.   I am sure ML BAC will never let you down.