Skip navigation
TE0819-berry.jpg

U.S. Supreme Court Decides Kaestner But Teaches Little

State tax on trust income violates due process clause.
Resources

The U.S. Supreme Court, in a unanimous decision, held in favor of the taxpayer in North Carolina Department of Revenue v. Kimberley Rice Kaestner 1992 Family Trust.1 The Court held that North Carolina can’t tax trust income based solely on the presence of in-state beneficiaries when the beneficiaries had no right to demand the income and weren’t certain to receive it. Although unanimous opinions are often referred to as “sweeping,” Kaestner was clearly designed to

All access premium subscription

Please Log in if you are currently a Trusts & Estates subscriber.


If you are interested in becoming a subscriber with unlimited article access, please select Subscription Options below.


Questions about your account or how to access content?


Contact: [email protected]

Hide comments

Comments

  • Allowed HTML tags: <em> <strong> <blockquote> <br> <p>

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
Publish