Trust is Sexy Again

Trust is Sexy Again

With the market and Wall Street’s reputations in tatters, clients are fleeing former high-flying financial powerhouses and flocking to banks and trusts - those boring firms of yesteryear

Like the bespectacled bookworm who suddenly reveals the prom queen within, Fiduciary Trust International says that lately, it feels like the belle of the ball. Not long ago, it wasn't unusual for folks at Fiduciary Trust to lose prospective clients to rivals on Wall Street who promised access to all the latest, hot alternative investments. But the firm, a custodial bank founded in 1931 by a group of lawyers looking for a safe haven for their clients' holdings, held the line. It stuck with its conservative investment philosophy rather than join the crowd in offering more aggressive — and fashionable — choices.

What a difference a market catastrophe makes. Lately, it has been flooded with assets from clients seeking the security of a reliable institution. While the company won't reveal specific figures for revenues or assets, bank officials will say that Fiduciary Trust signed up three times as many clients in September of 2008 as it has in past years.

“Boring is the new sexy,” says Gail Cohen, executive vice president and head of global wealth management at Fiduciary Trust.

Fiduciary Trust isn't alone. A handful of stick-in-the-mud private banks, wealth management firms, trust companies and others who didn't indulge in sub-prime loans or other toxic investments, are also experiencing a quantum leap in new clients looking for a safe home. The roster includes Bessemer Trust, Bank of New York Mellon, J.P. Morgan, and a number of others. In many cases, they're also getting a bigger share of existing clients' portfolios. A few firms are even reporting that last year was a record year for new business.

“Some of these institutions are taking in so much money, they don't know what to do with it all,” says Joseph Field, senior international partner at Withers Bergman, a New York-based law firm (and no relation to the author of this article).

Steady As She Goes

As a result of the new accounts, many of these banks are weathering the market crisis quite well, with asset inflows helping to offset market-related losses. Client assets at Bank of New York Mellon, for example, have barely budged. In September of last year, “before all hell broke loose,” the bank had $162 billion under management, says managing director Joe Fernandez. Fernandez won't offer a total for market-related losses since that time, but total assets now sit at $158 billion.

Or, take Bessemer. In 2008, the company added 17 new clients, up 65 percent from the year before, for a total of about $3.5 billion in new assets. Total assets under management sit at $52 billion, about the same as in 2007. “That new business definitely offset market value declines,” says Robert Elliott, senior managing director.

At J.P. Morgan Chase, the private bank “saw unprecedented inflows of new assets and new-client acquisition,” in 2008, says Joanne Johnson, head of U.S. trusts and estates for J.P. Morgan Private Bank. Net new asset flows for last year of about $80 billion represented a 25 percent increase from the year before; total client assets at the private bank are $417 billion.

The trend is by no means confined to the United States. At Pictet, a Geneva-based private bank, all areas of the firm's business — institutional asset management, private client services, and global custodian services — have seen an uptick, according to Dina De Angelo, director. Although she won't divulge numbers, she does say, “2008 was an amazing year for us.”

Another Geneva-based private bank, Lombard Odier Darier Hentsch, reports that it has been turning down prospective clients who don't meet its standards. “We do not expect to take on clients without both parties getting to know each other over time and understanding each others' expectations,” wrote Sally Tennant, CEO of Lombard Odier in London, in an email responding to our inquiries.

And, the Royal Bank of Canada has seen a “significant” increase in assets from both new clients and existing accounts, according to Francesca Boschini, director of fiduciary solutions for the U.S. and Latin America at the bank.

The attraction for many clients lies largely in the slow and steady investment strategy used by these institutions. Bessemer, for example, used auction rate securities for about four months, then dropped them in early 2008, when it became clear they were “having trouble getting them cleared,” according to Elliott. In addition, the bank never invested with managers, says Elliott, “when we couldn't understand their process.” The bank also avoided such risky investments as emerging markets.

Pictet, meanwhile, had no investment in sub-prime instruments — zero. And about 18 months ago, it took the step of moving from investing in gold funds to investing in the actual, physical stuff. “People want to come to the building and see their pile of gold,” says Di Angelo.

The way these conservative private banking firms manage their capital is also a lure. Take Mellon. As a traditional wealth manager and trustee, its clients' assets are, of course, segregated from the organization's balance sheet, providing an attractive source of protection. Bessemer, like most of these firms, makes no commercial loans. “We're only in the business of managing money for high-net-worth individuals,” says Elliott.

Perhaps most notable are Pictet and Lombard. Because both are run as partnerships, it's the owners who would be liable if the bank were to fail. As a result, the partners are particularly careful about their investment decisions. “If our clients lose everything, we lose everything,” says Di Angelo.

Client Panic

The bottom line for many clients is that these institutions exhibited sound judgment during the boom years, and seem to be the most likely players to remain solvent. There's also the government bailout factor. Fernandez recalls one entrepreneur who got spooked last fall when the financial institution holding his $50 million account accepted a liquidity injection from the government. He immediately moved his account to Mellon.

In some cases, people have switched their accounts in a veritable state of panic. Elliott points to a client who decided last fall to transfer his $20 million account from his then-bank to Bessemer — and to have it done in 24 hours, threatening to sue the original institution if it didn't comply. “That's the kind of fear these people are in,” he says.

Other clients moving their money are particularly interested in taking a more active role. According to Di Angelo, many of the new accounts at Pictet are insisting on putting their money in the advisory, rather than the discretionary, area of the business. “Clients coming in want to know what they're investing in,” says Di Angelo. “They want to retain the decision-making authority.”

Despite the flood of money, most of the firms are not staffing up. One exception is Mellon. According to Fernandez, the bank has increased business development staff by 10 percent to 20 percent recently. In his West Palm Beach Fla. office, he just hired a new senior portfolio manager.

How do the executives at these institutions feel about their new popularity? “Vindicated would not be a bad word to use,” says Elliott, who recalls a time in the recent past when clients regularly reacted with incredulity when he refused to make more aggressive investments. “People used to say, ‘They're not the sharpest pencil in the box.’ Now, they see our approach was the right one.”

Hide comments


  • Allowed HTML tags: <em> <strong> <blockquote> <br> <p>

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.