Skip navigation

Edward Jones/Jim Phillips

or Register to post new content in the forum

51 RepliesJump to last post

 

Comments

  • Allowed HTML tags: <em> <strong> <blockquote> <br> <p>

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
Jan 14, 2010 11:01 pm

I honestly don't know what they'll do for Jim's wife.  If I were in his shoes, with every GP check I got, I'd be buying some more life insurance.  You make $2+ mil a year just from your biz, you can put all that GP money to work with some leverage. 

We're jumping to conclusions about what Jones is or isn't going to do for Jim's wife.  None of us are at that level and we don't have the ear of Jim Weddle or John Bachmann.  I would certainly think that this conversation is a frequent one at Managing Partners conferences or Partners meetings or RL meetings.  Perhaps someone will send a suggbox wire to Weddle and ask about Jim's widow and his monster of a book.
Jan 14, 2010 11:39 pm

Technically he was an employee, if they treat his family different than any other employee’s family…the lawyers will be all over it.

  The days of backroom shenanigans are long gone. Weddle and Bachman probably want nothing more than to help that family but I would guess they can't.   Sadly, this illustrates the real conundrum at Jones. Do you build it for them...or do you find another alternative to build it for yourself or in the case of Mr. Phillips his grieving family.  
Jan 14, 2010 11:42 pm

Indy in two years for me.

  Windy Investments ... We'll blow you over with our bullsheet
Jan 15, 2010 1:49 am

[quote=Spaceman Spiff]Unfortunately I believe the suspicions about getting nothing for his mega book are more than likely true.  I hope I’m wrong.  That’s one thing I don’t understand about EDJ and our supervets within a few years of retirement.  Why guys like this don’t go indy at the last minute so they can sell their book is suprising.  I understand why Jones doesn’t address it, but it why those guys like Jim don’t take steps to figure it out is beyond me.  I’m really suprised we don’t lose more of them that are 60 years old.  Perhaps I just don’t run in the right circles to know why those guys think the way they do.   

  LP gets cashed out.  So, if he had $100K in LP, his widow gets three checks that total $100K.  I don't know what happens to his GP.  I've never asked a GP what were to happen to his partnership if he died.  My guess - and it's a pure guess - is that a check gets cut just like the LP.  The benefit to our partnership is the income stream it creates.  It's not the market value.  There isn't one.    Jim's widow isn't going to have any say over what happens to his book.  Chances are it will get split up between 4 or 5 FAs in the area.  Someone will probably get a really big chunk of it.  I'm voting for his younger brother that is there in that town too.  Keep it in the family at least.  [/quote]     It's much tougher to move a huge "Jones"  book versus most huge wire books for a few reasons....the typical monster JOnes book is a lot like Jim's....1000+ households, an average account of a few hundo's.  If you have spent a lifetime building it, and you never talk to 75% of your clients anymore (but still collect trails, fees, etc.), what are the chances of moving all that?  On top of that, his bonus is HUGE because he has so many asset holding and fee credits, and is always doing Goodknights, which absorbs even MORE overhead that it probably covers all his overhead, and then some, so every nickel of commission drops to his top bonus bracket.  With GP, LP, net Commissions, Bonus, Profit Sharing, he is probably bringing in $2.5mm in net income.  When we're in the top bonus bracket, his incremental commissions are coming in at like 80% payout.  So at age 60 he is going to build an empire outside of Jones to try and move all that?  Not saying it can't be done, but WTF would you want to??  As you said, why not just buy a monster life insurance policy in case you die, and do the transition package if you retire.  Or why not just keep doing Goodknights forever, and let someone else do the work, and work until you're 70?   OTOH, if you have 100 clients at $1.5mm each fee-based, it's probably MUCH easier to move, and could be VERY profitable in the indy world.  You could do that with 2-3 staff people.   In reality, that's why most Jones vets don't leave at that stage.  Inertia, gravy train, too many clients, too simple a life (for most).  In addition, you don't just transition your book then sell it a week later.  It's a much more involved process.  And remember, a "Jones" business is not qorth quite as much on the open market (a shares, stocks, and bonds), you woudl probably get 1-1.5 times gross.
Jan 15, 2010 1:49 am

I met Jim around 5 years ago when I was working in St. Louis and he was in town for a GP meeting.  One of the other GP’s introduced me to Jim, just saying LA this is my friend Jim.  I had no idea who the guy was at the time.  He had a wrinkled shirt, somewhat messy hair and was very friendly and seemed to care who I was.  Later in the day when I found out who he was I was shocked that such a large producer seemed like just another guy.  I think it is safe to say he was not in it for the money.  A year later a good buddy of mine joined his region in NC as a new FA.  He said Jim attended every single new FA meeting!!  This was a top 5 guy in the firm who took time to help FA’s many who would probably not make it in the business.

  As far as his assets go I remeber several years ago I big producer around 150 million with Jones in south FL passed away probably around late 50's also.  His wife was one of the BOA's of the office and had a son around 30 who had just started studying for the 7.  They split the branch in 2 and gave half to the wife (who became a Jones FA) and half to the son.  The son turned out to be a dead beat who refused to show up to PDP, gave trainers and other FA's hell and eventually got fired one year in.  Not sure what happened after him but I would imagine they gave the other half to the wife. 
Jan 15, 2010 2:09 am

I didn’t know the man, but maybe he figured that other people helped him get his start so he would like the idea that others can be helped by his legacy.
I wouldn’t shed any tears for his wife. Like B24 said, he probably left her in very good financial position.
The whole notion of leaving piles of money behind is bad fora society and for the economy. There is a lot more dead, trust fund money in Europe, for example, than in the U.S.
If my son or daughter wanted to be an advisor I would want to leave them a business, but I sure wouldn’t want to leave them my trails.


Jan 15, 2010 2:15 am

[quote=B24][quote=Spaceman Spiff]Unfortunately I believe the suspicions about getting nothing for his mega book are more than likely true.  I hope I’m wrong.  That’s one thing I don’t understand about EDJ and our supervets within a few years of retirement.  Why guys like this don’t go indy at the last minute so they can sell their book is suprising.  I understand why Jones doesn’t address it, but it why those guys like Jim don’t take steps to figure it out is beyond me.  I’m really suprised we don’t lose more of them that are 60 years old.  Perhaps I just don’t run in the right circles to know why those guys think the way they do.   

  LP gets cashed out.  So, if he had $100K in LP, his widow gets three checks that total $100K.  I don't know what happens to his GP.  I've never asked a GP what were to happen to his partnership if he died.  My guess - and it's a pure guess - is that a check gets cut just like the LP.  The benefit to our partnership is the income stream it creates.  It's not the market value.  There isn't one.    Jim's widow isn't going to have any say over what happens to his book.  Chances are it will get split up between 4 or 5 FAs in the area.  Someone will probably get a really big chunk of it.  I'm voting for his younger brother that is there in that town too.  Keep it in the family at least.  [/quote]     It's much tougher to move a huge "Jones"  book versus most huge wire books for a few reasons....the typical monster JOnes book is a lot like Jim's....1000+ households, an average account of a few hundo's.  If you have spent a lifetime building it, and you never talk to 75% of your clients anymore (but still collect trails, fees, etc.), what are the chances of moving all that?  On top of that, his bonus is HUGE because he has so many asset holding and fee credits, and is always doing Goodknights, which absorbs even MORE overhead that it probably covers all his overhead, and then some, so every nickel of commission drops to his top bonus bracket.  With GP, LP, net Commissions, Bonus, Profit Sharing, he is probably bringing in $2.5mm in net income.  When we're in the top bonus bracket, his incremental commissions are coming in at like 80% payout.  So at age 60 he is going to build an empire outside of Jones to try and move all that?  Not saying it can't be done, but WTF would you want to??  As you said, why not just buy a monster life insurance policy in case you die, and do the transition package if you retire.  Or why not just keep doing Goodknights forever, and let someone else do the work, and work until you're 70?   OTOH, if you have 100 clients at $1.5mm each fee-based, it's probably MUCH easier to move, and could be VERY profitable in the indy world.  You could do that with 2-3 staff people.   In reality, that's why most Jones vets don't leave at that stage.  Inertia, gravy train, too many clients, too simple a life (for most).  In addition, you don't just transition your book then sell it a week later.  It's a much more involved process.  And remember, a "Jones" business is not qorth quite as much on the open market (a shares, stocks, and bonds), you woudl probably get 1-1.5 times gross.[/quote] Pretty fair comments, though I think these monster books are few and far between. What about the guy who's 55, spent 15 years building a decent practice (first 3-5 of which could end up costing him money) which could comprise a much larger % of his estate if he were to die? Those are the questions I would be asking if I was at that stage of my career.
Jan 15, 2010 3:10 am

A little off topic but, this reminds me of when I was at Eval/Grad in Tempe, one of the Jones guys wondered across the street drunk and a 21 year old girl (drunk as well) ran over him and killed him. He was sitting in the little bar with us 20 mins before. Talk about an awkward week. According to the GP’s that came and spoke with us, his family will be “taken care of”. I’'m sure that means monetary, and I’m sure a big producer such as this guys family will also be taken care of.

Jan 15, 2010 3:24 am

“taken care of” as in please please please don’t sue us family.  I would think a good attorney could find Jones at fault for that in some way.  Maybe a visiting vet bought the guy a beer or something, who knows…

Jan 15, 2010 3:13 pm

LA,

You've probably seen that I am not the first one to jump to the defense of Jones, but I have seen and heard of many, many situations where Jones has done FAR more than would be expected of an employer in difficult times for an employee.  I've seen it wityh BOA's and FA's alike.  As much as people like to bash Jones, they really do some good things for their employees.  As far as "captive" B/D's (wires, regionals, etc.) are concerned, I think Jones is probably at the top as far as how they treat their employees.  It would be nice of they wold "formalize" some of these things, but that becomes a bit tough in certain situations....how do you treat a guy that worked for you 2 years, and built a $5mm book the same as someone with 30 years and a $200mm book?  That gets sticky.  So, if you die with the firm you get X% per year?  per $1mm of AUM?  There's really not a simple solution.
Jan 15, 2010 3:29 pm

[quote=B24]LA,

You've probably seen that I am not the first one to jump to the defense of Jones, but I have seen and heard of many, many situations where Jones has done FAR more than would be expected of an employer in difficult times for an employee.  I've seen it wityh BOA's and FA's alike.  As much as people like to bash Jones, they really do some good things for their employees.  As far as "captive" B/D's (wires, regionals, etc.) are concerned, I think Jones is probably at the top as far as how they treat their employees.  It would be nice of they wold "formalize" some of these things, but that becomes a bit tough in certain situations....how do you treat a guy that worked for you 2 years, and built a $5mm book the same as someone with 30 years and a $200mm book?  That gets sticky.  So, if you die with the firm you get X% per year?  per $1mm of AUM?  There's really not a simple solution.[/quote]

This is true.  However, it always seems the things Jones does for people has no rhyme or reason.  I never really understood it.
Jan 15, 2010 3:29 pm

[quote=hotair1]Indy in two years for me.

  Windy Investments ... We'll blow you over with our bullsheet[/quote]    
Jan 15, 2010 4:03 pm

[quote=B24]LA,

You've probably seen that I am not the first one to jump to the defense of Jones, but I have seen and heard of many, many situations where Jones has done FAR more than would be expected of an employer in difficult times for an employee.  I've seen it wityh BOA's and FA's alike.  As much as people like to bash Jones, they really do some good things for their employees.  As far as "captive" B/D's (wires, regionals, etc.) are concerned, I think Jones is probably at the top as far as how they treat their employees.  It would be nice of they wold "formalize" some of these things, but that becomes a bit tough in certain situations....how do you treat a guy that worked for you 2 years, and built a $5mm book the same as someone with 30 years and a $200mm book?  That gets sticky.  So, if you die with the firm you get X% per year?  per $1mm of AUM?  There's really not a simple solution.[/quote]   I'm beating the drum, but 20%/yr for five years would be fair, and Jones would probably retain far more of those referred to earlier that leave so they can sell their book in the future. I see no reason it couldn't be treated this way for a Goodknight or any other transition plan. It would garner much more respect for those that take over books, too.
Jan 15, 2010 4:24 pm

Luv, you get 100% over 3 years for the retirement transition plan.  What’s the difference between that and 20% for 5 years? 

Jan 15, 2010 4:31 pm
LA Broker:

“taken care of” as in please please please don’t sue us family.  I would think a good attorney could find Jones at fault for that in some way.  Maybe a visiting vet bought the guy a beer or something, who knows…

  It was a crazy ordeal. GP's were flying out to visit his family and everything. This was the Sat before Eval/Grad started. Usually everyone comes in on Sat and has a night to chill. This guy went a little overboard on the Miller Chill...Sat at our table for the majority of the night and then for some reason wondered off into the Arizona night alone at 1 in the morning.  Funny thing though, when I went back for PDP, there were no more Sat flights. Everyone got there on Sunday.
Jan 15, 2010 4:33 pm

Windy, you have all of the answers so you should have known he was going to get hit by a car and warned him ahead of time.

Jan 15, 2010 4:43 pm

[quote=Ron 14]

Windy, you have all of the answers so you should have known he was going to get hit by a car and warned him ahead of time.

[/quote]  
Jan 15, 2010 5:34 pm

[quote=B24]Luv, you get 100% over 3 years for the retirement transition plan.  What’s the difference between that and 20% for 5 years?  [/quote]

That’s new since I left, I didn’t know that was the plan. That’s fair enough. Mathematically, it may be more or less to pay out over a longer period, more assuming growth over time, but that’s academic.

If they offer 100% over 3 years to a transition advisor, they should do the same to a Goodknight or deceased advisor.

To clarify, is this 100% of gross commission?

Luv

Jan 15, 2010 6:51 pm

I take that back.  It’s actually150%.  The first 3 years you get 70%, 50%, 30%, so 150%.  But you are also still getting full benefits, 401K, profit sharing, trips, profit bonus, etc.  So it can actually be MORE than 150% with the bonus.  Then in the 4th year you are no longer on payroll and get a 10% “consultant fee”.  So all in, you are getting 160% gross plus bonus and 3 years of benefits.

I'm not sure what you mean by a Goodknight doing the same.  Do you mean the "giving" advisor should get that much?  I guess I see your point.  However, for the year (or 18 months for larger plans) the GK is in your office, you get 75% of the net commissions they produce (Jones grosses them up for both parties), PLUS they take all your overhead, so your bonus goes up dramatically.  For example, the year I did a GK plan, my vet probably netted an additional 75K.  Now, some was from my commissions, and some was from a much higher bonus (about 65K of overhead hit my P&L instead of his), and then some was from increased commission he generated because he was more focused (he unloaded a ton of teeny accounts on me).   For some of the huge producers, some of them are doing two GK plans at a time, all the time.  So if you aer constantly doing that, your net increases dramatically.  In some cases, bigger producers are able to net out (with everything) over 70% because the artifically high bonus and added net commissions from the new GK FA's.
Jan 15, 2010 7:43 pm

[quote=Spaceman Spiff]

I honestly don't know what they'll do for Jim's wife.  If I were in his shoes, with every GP check I got, I'd be buying some more life insurance.  You make $2+ mil a year just from your biz, you can put all that GP money to work with some leverage. 

We're jumping to conclusions about what Jones is or isn't going to do for Jim's wife.  None of us are at that level and we don't have the ear of Jim Weddle or John Bachmann.  I would certainly think that this conversation is a frequent one at Managing Partners conferences or Partners meetings or RL meetings.  Perhaps someone will send a suggbox wire to Weddle and ask about Jim's widow and his monster of a book. [/quote]   I know what they would do for your wife or mine for that matter. I disagree with that part of the system as well.   This is a sad reminder of our industry. Working long hours, type A personality. Be careful out there and make sure you are taking care of yourself. I know Jim had a heart attack like 6 yrs ago and he was still working 50-60 hours a week. Very sad but at some point everyone needs to recogonize their success and slow the machine down. His youngest just started college too, again take care of yourselves so you can live long and healthy.