Citibank / citi personal wealth mgmt advisors

Jun 30, 2009 7:37 pm

does anyone have info on recent program changes…ie…payout, penalty boxes, platform and reinstatement of the referral program? just curious…

Jun 30, 2009 7:56 pm

I cannot imagine citi having the gall to tell clients how to handle money when citi cannot handle there own.

  Who in the world would listen to them?  
Jun 30, 2009 8:27 pm

no kidding...I totally agree...

Your question: who in the world would listen to them?

A: clueless bank clients who don't understand full-service brokerage and base their major financial decisions purely on convenience.  said unsophisticated clients have never maintained advisor relationships at major wirehouses, regionals or independents. said clients are commoditized into getting everything for free....free mortgage quote, free investment consultation, free sh*tty-bank logo golf balls when a well-qualified, G.E.D. hopeful, banker slams them into a checking account or bank product they don't need..the same banker that says he has a "great referral" for his financial advisor partner, yet couldn't remember the client's name or document the profile information..      
Jul 1, 2009 11:37 am

It is a good thing broker/dealers going out of business don’t have liquidation sales. If that were the case we would all be in trouble as all of the Citi owned companies would be selling their Legg Mason Funds at half price.

Jul 1, 2009 3:28 pm

I would like an update on the former Smith Barney bank-based advisors, now Citi Personal Wealth Management.  Isn't true wealth management personal by nature?!?! way to go Citi!  To my knowledge, they retain the SB technology and product suite until told otherwise.  Will the comp structure change to be more in line with a bank program or will the bank brokers remain on the current SB comp plan with penalty boxes for those with los 5-9 years doing less than $300K?

Oct 18, 2009 7:51 pm

Citi management is getting rid of everything and has outright lied to their advisors about their intentions for the past 6 months. Citi will have an extremely limited offering relative to the robust offering it currently has with the platform gained from its time with  Smith Barney.

It;s been all lies.  First " We are not Selling Smith Barney" “We are keeping Smith Barney technology and platform for at least 3 years.”  "Not much will change for our clients"

Now firm has announced in the press that we are going to move to fee only platform in 2010 and will phase out comp on any transactional business.  The firm is also strong arming advisors to form RIA like teams in order to comptete for refferals with independent RIA’s. 

All this was anounced more than a week ago and Citi advisors are learning more about the plan by reading the paper than from any communication within the firm. 

The deceitfulness and lack of professional courtesy has everyone extremely upset.  I beleive Citi will loose first quartile advisors which were very impressed with the way Smith Barney did things and think that bank management is a joke.

Oct 19, 2009 2:16 pm

EASY E - my thoughts exactly.  how ironic is it that they told advisors that the “SB platform would remain in the bank channel and nothing would change for 3 years” … while simultaneously hiring and integrating Deborah McWhinney in April…who spearheaded Schwab’s RIA unit…seriously, are they that lame?!

  I'm so curious to see how many advisors they lose..
Oct 19, 2009 2:24 pm

Yet you are still there?

Oct 19, 2009 8:41 pm

If they were smart, they would hire an attorney and cpa into the new teams, and market themselves as a turn key “Family Office” to high net worth.  They could carve out a unique niche compared to the other wires and probably do well.

  But then again it is Citi....
Oct 19, 2009 10:01 pm

Does anyone know if it’s legal? Can they force people to comingle accounts… Seems like it dilutes the reps and certainly removes any equity that has been built into everyones practice… Of course if you want to leave, they will say goodbye, how are supposed to take clients from teams of 10 people… So they use you for a year or two, use you for introducing your clients to the “team” , then you basiclly give away your book for the " powerful" citi machine… Seems very cold war Russia esque… Are any advisors discussing legalities of this???

Oct 20, 2009 1:12 am

100 percent true… They’ve lied all the way through… Now they want the reps to give away they’re clients…where doyou think 1st quintile reps will go???

Oct 20, 2009 2:34 am

I have thought of incorporating an  attorney or accountant in order to increase the value proposition If I were to stay.  It could be interesting as long as the firm would allow these new partners to have an outside business interest.  Most accountants or attorneys that I know run their own businesses. 


Oct 20, 2009 4:56 pm

I do not understand this whining!

 It sucks for sure!  But it is a wirehouse, you had to know they were going to screw you over, but yet you stayed   It is not easy to move a book. But it is now or never for you    I think you know it to!
Oct 20, 2009 9:25 pm

Moving a bank book is hard enough, moving months from now once assets are flowing into the new RIA business will become impossible. Anyone not making it out asap is going to quickly find themselves about as marketable as the guys on the other end of a TD Ameritrade 800 line. 

Oct 22, 2009 3:52 am
excitr1011:

Does anyone know if it’s legal? Can they force people to comingle accounts… Seems like it dilutes the reps and certainly removes any equity that has been built into everyones practice… Of course if you want to leave, they will say goodbye, how are supposed to take clients from teams of 10 people… So they use you for a year or two, use you for introducing your clients to the “team” , then you basiclly give away your book for the " powerful" citi machine… Seems very cold war Russia esque… Are any advisors discussing legalities of this???

  When did you ever have a book? Working the banks asset list and taking referrals from other bank employees isn't building a book for you, it's building one for the bank that employs you.
Oct 22, 2009 3:54 am

[quote=Greenbacks]I do not understand this whining!

 It sucks for sure!  But it is a wirehouse, you had to know they were going to screw you over, but yet you stayed   It is not easy to move a book. But it is now or never for you    I think you know it to![/quote]   It isn't a wirehouse you dimwit, it's a bank. I find it very hard to believe you run any sort of business. Are you someone's assistant?
Oct 22, 2009 2:59 pm

EasyE - do you know any local MSSB managers?  If you’re at or around $500k, you might have a shot at moving there.  Just because Citi’s bank channel advisors weren’t invited to take part in the joint venture doesn’t mean they can’t move in arrears…

Oct 22, 2009 7:18 pm

Greenbacks what do you mean you say dont understand the whining?  You’re right, you don’t understand.   It is not unreasonable to expect your employer to at least ad hear to basic decency, respect and honesty to it’s employees.  Do you disagree?  If you commit yourself to firm it’s a big deal.  Much thought is put into that decision and you have to base it on what you are told you can expect.  When you are then treated like trash and lied to and had your pay cut every year, who would not be upset and surprised?  I know I was and that is why I left that God forsaken company.  My book followed me.  Citi is a horrible company in my opinion.  I work for myself now and thank my lucky stars I left when I did.  

Oct 22, 2009 8:14 pm
ESmini:

Greenbacks what do you mean you say dont understand the whining? You’re right, you don’t understand. It is not unreasonable to expect your employer to at least ad hear to basic decency, respect and honesty to it’s employees. Do you disagree? If you commit yourself to firm it’s a big deal. Much thought is put into that decision and you have to base it on what you are told you can expect. When you are then treated like trash and lied to and had your pay cut every year, who would not be upset and surprised? I know I was and that is why I left that God forsaken company. My book followed me. Citi is a horrible company in my opinion. I work for myself now and thank my lucky stars I left when I did.



u do futures ?
Oct 22, 2009 9:07 pm

Yes.  I also manage a hedged investment account for clients. 

Oct 22, 2009 9:53 pm

can you have a midlife crisis for the heroin of spec trading?



i miss it

Oct 23, 2009 5:13 pm

TODAY we’ll see if there’s any real momentum out the door amongst the Citi crew. My hunch is maybe 10-20 leave today, that number doubles next Friday and then a slow drip through Thanksgiving. 

Oct 23, 2009 6:23 pm

I hope all the fa’s take the clients too…

Oct 27, 2009 3:02 am

Really??? I heard we weren’t able to join the joint venture, some sort of block they put on the reps? Could it be if we contact the mssb managers ourselves, could they hire advisors like that instead? Just curious because they didn’t give us the option at first…

Oct 27, 2009 12:11 pm

Ar

Oct 27, 2009 4:39 pm

[quote=meletio] Are you joking. your entire industry lost money and can’t manage their own money. face it…you are a loser who works for other losers trying to skim a tiny bit of each clients moneyand turn it into your own. The days of a broker thinking he is hot sh*t because he works for a Wall Street firm are over. You are nothing but a commodity selling a commoditized product that any client can buy thru fidelity or Schwab for 1/3 of the fees.

[/quote]



fees hit yesterday.    



$247,897.      



God bless america

Oct 28, 2009 1:02 am

I heard that a 2 million dollar producer from NY left Monday to Morgan Stanley Smith Barney. I am curious if anyone can confirm.  I thought MSSB would not be an option.

Oct 28, 2009 2:44 pm

Yes a group on the north shore left for MSSB.  Heard they got a nice package.

  It is going to be the easiest book transfer in history:   Mr client, as we discussed several years ago the SB platform is a diverse competitive platform for me to effectively manage your finances.  Now Citi is insisting that I no longer bring you the right product to fit your needs; instead they only will allow me to charge you an annual fee in order to boost their revenues to bring the company out of bankruptcy.  I think we should stay on the same platform we have been working on for several years.  Sign this form and we will continue as we have been.  Oh, and by the way, if you do not come with me there will be no one at Citi to work with you.   I don't work for them, but I see that as a pitch.   And no, they are not calling the book of the team that just left.   From what I hear, in general, they would prefer most of the advisors to leave in order to wind down the business.
Oct 29, 2009 12:43 am

I heard that they were calling his clients, and that when Lee went to the branch to drop off his keys on Saturday that there were three guys there calling his clients plus callers from the national call center.

I do not think it will make any difference.  Most clients that hung around with Citi after all of the crap that has gone down, only stayed around because of their advisors.  I suspect most clients are glad to move out out that sh*thole.

The only thing that would have been easier would have been to block tranfer all of his accounts.  In any case I heard he already had 180 out of 220 million in AUMs commited to moving.

Oct 29, 2009 1:15 am

Are you sayig that a 2MM team from Citi got recruited by MSSB?

Doesnt make sense - i cant believe when Citi made the deal to form the JV with MS, they were dumb enough to not have MS sign a non compete when it comes to recruits.....no wait, actually, i can.   But seriously is that what really happened?  
Oct 29, 2009 2:13 am

Yes it happened

Oct 29, 2009 2:33 pm

Look up their names and pull them up in FINRA.org… broker check man… its’ easy to see that their registration MOVED to MSSB 3 days ago!   MSSB has ZERO interest in guys < $500k. If you’re over $500k AND you can show a solid upward trajectory in asset growth AND you’re doing a significant amount of fee based business etc… they’ll be all over you.   MSSB is not alone. I know for a FACT some guys are close to getting decent offers from ML as well. Again let me be clear, the wires are not chasing the $250k producing annuity hound. They’re being selective, paying attention to frequent movers, U4s, etc. 

Oct 29, 2009 3:59 pm

[quote=Sportsfreakbob]Are you sayig that a 2MM team from Citi got recruited by MSSB?

Doesnt make sense - i cant believe when Citi made the deal to form the JV with MS, they were dumb enough to not have MS sign a non compete when it comes to recruits.....no wait, actually, i can.   But seriously is that what really happened?  [/quote] This was a one off situation.  It was literally on Vikram P's desk.  I've heard all other calls from $1mm+ guys have since been respectfully declined (Westchester crew?).    As far as the calling of the book, I personally know one of the people "assigned" to call and "they" are, lets just say, not hitting the phone very hard...   When the producer leaving is heads and shoulders above the talent of any one else in the company and most of the industry for that matter, saving the assets is a dead issue...
Oct 29, 2009 4:10 pm

I find it extremely hard to believe that Vikram Pandit actually concerns himself with other businesses aside from the institutional client group, i-banking or prop trading.  Hence one of the reasons ‘Dear Sally’ left for Mother Merrill…

Oct 29, 2009 4:33 pm

Believe it, this was a ceo to ceo exception.  I know a few people close to the deal…

Oct 29, 2009 9:42 pm

Even if it’s a so-called “one- off” attorneys will have a field day , it’s total bs if they block other reps for doing the same. You can’t just say well ok you guys are ok, but the rest of you no… If they don’t want reps yo leave, they should have included us in jv, very simple… Then again, it’s citi…

Oct 30, 2009 3:43 am

[quote=shantom1]Believe it, this was a ceo to ceo exception.  I know a few people close to the deal…[/quote]
Did you overhear the conversation while you were bringing Vikrim his coffee?

Oct 30, 2009 2:25 pm

Funny.  I don’t really care what you think.  I know the same person who put together the deal has received literally dozens of calls from citi reps and has had to respectfully decline them.  What makes this so hard to believe?  

  What would make it an attorneys field day?  You are employed at will, they can do anything they want.  If BOTH parties to the non compete agree, then there is not a question.    Who would be the ones to sue?  A citi rep.  HAHAHA, "Mr attorney I want to sue mssb because they wont hire me, I'm really really good and they wont hire.  They hired Lee, but they wont hire me, it's just not fair!!!" (sounds of baby crying...)    
Oct 30, 2009 2:53 pm

Did said MSSB manager decline the Citi reps’ calls because of a conflict of interest or production level?  I still can’t imagine that Vikram would involve himself with a $2mm bank channel team after a year of firms like UBS absolutely raiding his high-end SB producers with 250%+ deals.  From what I recall and under Vikram’s watch, $40 billion in assets flew out the door due to Smith Barney and Citi Private Bank attrition.  Better hurry or that big Citibank team might leave!  I hope a good number of Citi reps find a home at MSSB…it’s adequate reparation for all of Citi’s b.s. and lies…

  Vikram took time away from waving bye-bye to Bobby Rubin, getting pissed-on by his $100 million dollar a year Philibro energy trader, squaring Citi's ultra-leveraged trading positions and crunching numbers on the 11% interest per annum he's paying on an essential junk bond sold to Abu Dabi investment corp.....sums up parts of a "day-in-the-life-of"   I still don't buy it man, sorry.
Oct 30, 2009 3:00 pm

If Vikram cared so much, why didn’t he offer retention to Citi’s top bank channel advisors?  enough said.

Oct 30, 2009 3:03 pm

Vikram helms the most toxic big bank brand on the planet right now, why would anyone expect anything that makes sense to come out of his office? 

Oct 30, 2009 3:22 pm

Wow, you guys really think he is that untouchable? 

  Lets face it, is it that hard to believe that the number one (or at least in the top three) producer in the corporation leaves to mssb seemingly violating a corporate non-compete and the ceo gets involved?  He was NOT trying to save the team with counter offers etc, his approval was needed because of the corporate non-compete.   Can you show me a reason he would NOT be involved?    And no, mssb has flat refused to talk to other 7 figure producers at citi...    
Oct 30, 2009 4:10 pm

Shantom, get a clue… Who’s refused to talk with citi reps? Mssb or your recruiter “buddies” in the westcoast? You have no clue bc I know for a fact, mssb managers at talking to citi reps. You can keep your recruiters .

Oct 30, 2009 5:05 pm

The market will have a major crash on Monday November 2nd 2009

Oct 30, 2009 5:07 pm

[quote=meletio] The market will have a major crash on Monday November 2nd 2009

[/quote]



Define “crash”, gayboy.

Oct 30, 2009 5:10 pm

c

Oct 30, 2009 5:13 pm

[quote=meletio] crash is when I bend your mom over the table

[/quote]



My mom’s female, sorry you didn’t know. Besides, I always thought you were a taker unless your boyfriend was playing submissive.



By the way, that was the worst response. “Crash is when I bend your mom over the table”. But as usual, you don’t make any sense.



Probably because I don’t speak queer. Odd that you “only” speak queer. Evidence for genetic homosexuality.

Oct 30, 2009 5:25 pm

Th

Oct 30, 2009 5:31 pm

[quote=meletio] Think what you want , but she really enjoyed herself. If you need me I’ll be at your home taking care of your wife

[/quote]



Unlikely meleti-ho, since you’ll be needed to rub your boyfriend’s a$$. I can, however take care of YOUR nasty wife - she knows it’s a sham marriage anyway. She thinks it’s her fault, not realizing the few times you tried to have sex with her that you WERE trying. I explained it to her while she was choking on my c**k that was why you are the receiver - you don’t have enough meat to give your boyfriend a good time either.

Oct 30, 2009 5:37 pm

hey meletio - do you post while taking it in the a$$? the bold, large letters were a pretty clear indication.



Also, do you find that your queerness helps or hurts when working with straight people? Legitimate question. Some people are put off by homosexuality. Or do you exclusively work with your boyfriends’ friends and family?

Oct 30, 2009 5:39 pm

Hey meletio - your wife is freaked out! She thinks you might have given her HIV. Don’t worry, I told her that it requires penetration, and since you’ve never been able to, that she doesn’t need to worry.



On the other hand, how’s your T-cell count doing? I know that your hero is Pedro from the real world, but he didn’t last that long. Lucky for you that was a long time ago. Science is a little better.

Oct 30, 2009 5:45 pm

Hey meletio - I understand that you are lobbying to get free healthcare in the new Bill - to treat the “gay” diseases.



There was some tape caught by a CNN reporter earlier today. Here is a portion of the transcript:



Barney Frank: I don’t know about passing this health care bill but I could sure use a meletio.



Campbell Brown: What is a meletio?



Frank: Well a meletio is an insiders secret.



Brown: So you are keeping secrets from the American people



Frank: No, no - of course not.



Frank (speaking very fast): meletioisthenameofaguywhoservicesgaymenbyallowingthementosh!tinhismouthandgetbeatenwithad!ck.



Brown: Excuse me?



Frank: a meletio is not really something I need. It’s kind of like a skidmark in your favorite tighty-whities. It’s disgusting, but it’s yours. You know what I mean?



Brown: Ohhh-kayyyyy. Back to you Anderson. Barney Frank, needs a meletio.

Oct 30, 2009 5:49 pm

Hey meletio - I’ll make a deal with you:



Define what you mean by a market crash on Monday and if it happens, I’ll leave you alone.



If it doesn’t you have to post here every day reminding everybody that you are an idiot.



Sound fair?

Oct 30, 2009 5:51 pm
excitr1011:

Shantom, get a clue… Who’s refused to talk with citi reps? Mssb or your recruiter “buddies” in the westcoast? You have no clue bc I know for a fact, mssb managers at talking to citi reps. You can keep your recruiters .



Not talking to recruiters, I'm talking to 2 BOM's at MS offices. They were told don't even think about it. You don't believe me make the call yourself.
Oct 30, 2009 5:51 pm

Hey meletio - did you know that any children you may have are ALSO likely to be gay?

Oct 30, 2009 5:55 pm

Hey meletio - you are about as gay as can be.

Oct 30, 2009 6:36 pm

W

Oct 30, 2009 6:46 pm

80-120+ at least. I’ll bet on it. Oh wait, I just did as I move money into the market for me and clients.

Oct 30, 2009 7:15 pm

W

Oct 30, 2009 7:20 pm

What the hell are you talking about?



You are still gay. Still take it up the a$$. No one respects your opinions. And you still don’t know what you’re talking about.



Oct 30, 2009 7:49 pm

Wow, you two are great poster childs for our industry, not only do you kill the thread but you embarrass yourselves with child like comments. Imagine if one of your clients read this…

Oct 30, 2009 9:14 pm

[quote=meletio]FYI…never been a broker. I trade stocks with my own money and could probably buy you 50 times over . Piker
[/quote]

Go post somewhere else, then. This is a forum for registered reps. Nobody here is interested in your stupid “predictions”.

Oct 30, 2009 9:32 pm

True

Oct 30, 2009 9:46 pm

I hope these idiots are not the typical Citi FA. What fools.  This board is prowled by far more non-FAs than FAs to be sure and it speaks volumes about them as people that they’d carry on as they have. 

Oct 31, 2009 1:10 am

I am fairly sure people at Citi have much more on their minds than all this banter about the market crash of Nov 6 2009 or who’s a fag.  I hope they start their own thread to continue insulting each other.

Oct 31, 2009 1:18 pm

I

Oct 31, 2009 3:46 pm
meletio:

It’s only a stupid prediction because you are scared of the truth…watch out for Monday. I hope you retards have not sucked your clients into this false rally because you are all about to get your asses handed to you. have fun !

  BFD. If Dow goes to 7500 on Monday morning I will do absolutely nothing besides tell people to buy more. Your scare tactics work for those who are getting in and out, not on those who buy and buy more.
Oct 31, 2009 4:16 pm

g

Oct 31, 2009 5:23 pm

I am surprised that the team leaving in New York to MSSB did not make the NEWS.  The anouncement that Citi was going to be only fee based was all over the internet and papers when it was announced.

  I think it would be a good follow up story to show how the second highest producing team left even before the new comp plan came out and went back to Smith Barney even though there was a supposed non compete.   How could this not be worthy of being a news story?   You read about teams leaving from one firm to another all the time.  This story is definately more interesting, since it involves guys wanting to rejointheir previous firm vs going along with the experiment of converting Citi into Shwab II.
Oct 31, 2009 8:27 pm
meletio:

great solution …if you keep telling your clients to buy , buy , buy you are simply a puppet that does what the bone head wall street strategist say. what a joke. So you are one of those broken record guys who tells clients to buy on every dip. That’s worked out great over the last ten years. I’m just glad I don’t pay you for advice because you have none. By the way if the mkt does go to 7500 then your little 10million dollar book aint gonna have any $ to buy more

  Actually it has worked nicely over the last 10 years because there have been 2 monster dips. How is that bomb shelter in your basement coming along ?
Oct 31, 2009 8:52 pm

g

Oct 31, 2009 8:54 pm

Also even if you averaged down on the dips you still underperformed the treasury mkt over the same period. So basically what you did is overcharged your clients for sh*tty advice

Oct 31, 2009 10:24 pm

So, exactly what is this new compensation plan at CPWM? Somebody explain, please.

Oct 31, 2009 10:30 pm
meletio:

Also even if you averaged down on the dips you still underperformed the treasury mkt over the same period. So basically what you did is overcharged your clients for sh*tty advice

  Well just like you know the market is going to crash this coming monday, I knew the exact bottoms !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Clown.
Oct 31, 2009 10:56 pm

Meletio, you have a lot to say for a nobody.

To sum up, you were never a broker, you are worth a sh!tload of money, you are an expert on the securities market, you think we suck, and no doubt you swing the biggest d!ck this side of the moon. Is all that about right ?

To say your a moron is too easy. We can tell from the time you spend on here, and your never ending strutting that your are an empty suit who is desperate for some kind of attention. Its obvious you don’t have money, and stay off the keyboards unless you have your pants on. Around your ankles doesn’t count.

Either that or you are mentally ill. 

Nov 1, 2009 12:55 am
clang:

Meletio, you have a lot to say for a nobody.

To sum up, you were never a broker, you are worth a sh!tload of money, you are an expert on the securities market, you think we suck, and no doubt you swing the biggest d!ck this side of the moon. Is all that about right ?

To say your a moron is too easy. We can tell from the time you spend on here, and your never ending strutting that your are an empty suit who is desperate for some kind of attention. Its obvious you don’t have money, and stay off the keyboards unless you have your pants on. Around your ankles doesn’t count.

Either that or you are mentally ill. 

ALL THAT, PLUS, HE'S AN IDIOT - OUR VILLAGE IDIOT!
Nov 1, 2009 2:55 pm

What a bunch of tools. The reason the world is in crisis is thanks to you “advisors” peddling crap. No one needs an “advisor”.



They’d be better off following the advice of people on CNBC or FoxBusiness. Or, even their neighbor than pay outrageous sums of money.



Pimps add more value to prostitutes than you add to your clients.

Nov 1, 2009 3:01 pm

O

Nov 1, 2009 3:46 pm

Nov 1, 2009 4:05 pm

I

Nov 1, 2009 4:55 pm

How did meletio build his net worth, don’t want to go searching through the entire forum.

Nov 1, 2009 6:12 pm
Mr.Blonde:

How did meletio build his net worth, don’t want to go searching through the entire forum.



Probably the way most people build it - by not giving it away to tools who think they can manage it better.

Nov 1, 2009 6:18 pm
permabear:

What a bunch of tools. The reason the world is in crisis is thanks to you “advisors” peddling crap. No one needs an “advisor”.

They’d be better off following the advice of people on CNBC or FoxBusiness. Or, even their neighbor than pay outrageous sums of money.

Pimps add more value to prostitutes than you add to your clients.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gUkbdjetlY8   CNBC huh?  
Nov 1, 2009 6:20 pm

I’ve seen it. At least nobody had to PAY Cramer before he lost their money. They pay YOU pathetic fools AND lose money in the market.

Nov 1, 2009 6:31 pm

permabitter. How much did your broker lose for you?

Nov 1, 2009 6:36 pm

Permabear = Putsy

Nov 1, 2009 6:44 pm

Quite a bit actually. I was in IT and would have conversations with my broker, who always used to say, “don’t worry, it’ll come back”.



Since I fired his ass ten years ago and invested my own money, I managed to make quite a bit.



I remember asking him questions, he didn’t have any clue what he was doing. Like all of you. I interviewed ten different guys from ten different places after I fired him. You are all equally worthless.



No knowledge. You are all crooks. Oh, I’m sorry. PROFESSIONAL crooks.

Nov 1, 2009 6:48 pm

So how much did you lose on your own?

Nov 1, 2009 6:57 pm
Mr.Blonde:

So how much did you lose on your own?



Zero. Because I know how to trade. I use cold, hard numbers to make my decisions. Not hope and pessimism.

I haven't needed to work in three years because of my trading.
Nov 1, 2009 6:59 pm

permabitter. unhealthy to continue to let it get to you. you fired him at the bottom of the tech melt down and then rode the market back up by yourself.

I have IT engineers as clients. I had some I fired because they are too much work. But that doesn’t mean all you guys are smelly, nerd freaks with limited social graces who couldn’t get a good looking chick if she parked her twat on your nose.

So there is no need to blast our whole industry.

You need to move on bro.

Nov 1, 2009 7:02 pm

Just read your last post.

As sure as the sun rises tomorrow, you will ultimately blow yourself up.

Nov 1, 2009 7:15 pm
permabear:

[quote=Mr.Blonde] So how much did you lose on your own?[/quote]

Zero. Because I know how to trade. I use cold, hard numbers to make my decisions. Not hope and pessimism.

I haven’t needed to work in three years because of my trading.

Well, I guess I've heard it all now, can you be my broker What companies did you buy and what cold hard numbers are you using? please educate all of us and every analyst looking at charts for 12 hours a day.
Nov 1, 2009 7:34 pm

a

Nov 1, 2009 7:42 pm
Mr.Blonde:

[quote=permabear] [quote=Mr.Blonde] So how much did you lose on your own?[/quote] Zero. Because I know how to trade. I use cold, hard numbers to make my decisions. Not hope and pessimism. I haven’t needed to work in three years because of my trading.



Well, I guess I’ve heard it all now, can you be my broker What companies did you buy and what cold hard numbers are you using? please educate all of us and every analyst looking at charts for 12 hours a day. [/quote]



Most of those analysts you worship are idiots, or at the very least complicit in your industry’s scheme to transfer wealth from the people who EARNED it to yourselves and your firms.



I can give you cold hard numbers all day. But you will just say that I’m lying about when I bought and sold. What calculations I use are mine and mine alone.



But here’s a guarantee: I bet I beat more than 95% of the analysts on the Street. Which means I’m beating you too.
Nov 1, 2009 7:53 pm

H

Nov 1, 2009 7:58 pm

I was referred to this forum by a friend who told me all it is is a place that talks about the ways you all use to take money from hard-working folks.



Show me a post on here that talks about you can actually help someone. Provide some value.



You are all a bunch of thieves (excepting meletio).

Nov 1, 2009 8:01 pm

I sell life and disability insurance to hard-working people who care about their families.

  Does that count?
Nov 1, 2009 8:41 pm

permabitter and meletio. Nobody here cares who you are or what you have to say.

We have seen bullsh!tters like you come and go all the time. No big deal. we know you have no money. the ones who yell the most never do.

maybe the two of you should get together and fk the misery out of each other.

Nov 1, 2009 9:37 pm

Don’t mistake me for one of those that have a lot of faith in analysts. My comment was a query as to how a former IT nerd would have so much insight into the market when the majority of your day is probably spent removing viruses and cookies from employees computers who look at porn on their lunch hour.

  Have you ever seen a portfolio of a DIY'er after he's blown himself up and he sheepishly comes in wanting a second opinion?   Do you really think that millions of investors around the world see no value in the work that we do, you should know the markets are pretty efficient in the long term and none of us would be around posting on this site during business hours.
Nov 1, 2009 9:57 pm

Stop feeding the two-headed permabear-meletio troll. They are obviously the same person.

Nov 1, 2009 11:07 pm

Here’s how I know for a fact that you do not know how to ‘crunch numbers’ as you say Perma.

  Some quick math for you. If you made say 250k a year at your current job and had say 500k in investable assets you would lose money investing for yourself. At 250k per year you make $125 an hour (2000 hours per year). If you invest your own money you would need to spend at least 20 hours per week in research and number crunching to have any shot at making smart decisions. With 500k in investable assets you'll pay no more than $75k per year to have someone make solid investing decisions for you (fee or transaction based, those numbers are HIGH either way, more like 50k). So, if you really were able to crunch numbers you'd know that your SPENDING $125k per year to invest for yourself in time but you could spend $75k in to 'outsource' this.   Any smart professional (Doctor, Lawyer, FA, CPA, etc) knows that your TIME is worth more than those that you outsource to. Can a Doctor take care of his own lawn as well or better than a Landscaping service? Absolutely, but his time is worth more than the gardener's.   So, in conclusion, if you make 50k per year you are absolutely right. You can manage your money for less than someone like me. That's because my time is worth more than yours. Once you make some real money, then you can come see me. Until then, I'll just outsource activities to someone like you.   There is a reason affluent individuals outsource as much as they can. Because they can CRUNCH NUMBERS where as middle-class folks like you cannot. It's called leveraging the only thing on earth that is truely finite. TIME. Learn to leverage your time and you'll figure it out.    
Nov 1, 2009 11:22 pm

7

Nov 1, 2009 11:34 pm
meletio:

75k in fees…are you insane .i’m thinking that was a typo. 20 hours a week research…why?
maybe if you’re retarded.this mkt is so easy to trade with zero research. Your B.S. comment does not explain why every major brokerage firm is losing assets faster than they can get them and all of those $ are moving to schwab and fidelity. Smart people realize that you guys are worthless and not anywhere worth the fees you charge. I got some scary news for you also. They are not coming back . Everyone on this forum …( except permabear ) is circling the drain and when the mkt  corrects big time ( this week ) you should hear the FLUSH !  You guys should get to sleep now because after this week you will be completely exhausted trying to fight off the ACATS out. Sorry , but true

Who is this guy?   Though is he right on LSU's math, might want to do that again LSU.
Nov 1, 2009 11:36 pm

20 hours in research. Now I know you are an idiot. People are on here bragging about that they only work 20 hours a week. When do you talk to your clients? You “advisors” are all liars.

Nov 1, 2009 11:36 pm
meletio:

75k in fees…are you insane .i’m thinking that was a typo. 20 hours a week research…why?
maybe if you’re retarded.this mkt is so easy to trade with zero research. Your B.S. comment does not explain why every major brokerage firm is losing assets faster than they can get them and all of those $ are moving to schwab and fidelity. Smart people realize that you guys are worthless and not anywhere worth the fees you charge. I got some scary news for you also. They are not coming back . Everyone on this forum …( except permabear ) is circling the drain and when the mkt  corrects big time ( this week ) you should hear the FLUSH !  You guys should get to sleep now because after this week you will be completely exhausted trying to fight off the ACATS out. Sorry , but true

    If you are so smart, and this market is so easy to trade, tell us again why you failed as a broker.
Nov 1, 2009 11:46 pm
Jebediah:

[quote=meletio]75k in fees…are you insane .i’m thinking that was a typo. 20 hours a week research…why?
maybe if you’re retarded.this mkt is so easy to trade with zero research. Your B.S. comment does not explain why every major brokerage firm is losing assets faster than they can get them and all of those $ are moving to schwab and fidelity. Smart people realize that you guys are worthless and not anywhere worth the fees you charge. I got some scary news for you also. They are not coming back . Everyone on this forum …( except permabear ) is circling the drain and when the mkt  corrects big time ( this week ) you should hear the FLUSH !  You guys should get to sleep now because after this week you will be completely exhausted trying to fight off the ACATS out. Sorry , but true

    If you are so smart, and this market is so easy to trade, tell us again why you failed as a broker.   Ahhh, now I know. Bitter about failing now comes on a public website to "expose" us brokers. Hey, if it keeps him from climbing a water tower, have at it, though it would be better if he just started a one man cult and drank the koolaid....hey EJ is hiring.[/quote]
Nov 1, 2009 11:54 pm
Mr.Blonde:

[quote=meletio]75k in fees…are you insane .i’m thinking that was a typo. 20 hours a week research…why?
maybe if you’re retarded.this mkt is so easy to trade with zero research. Your B.S. comment does not explain why every major brokerage firm is losing assets faster than they can get them and all of those $ are moving to schwab and fidelity. Smart people realize that you guys are worthless and not anywhere worth the fees you charge. I got some scary news for you also. They are not coming back . Everyone on this forum …( except permabear ) is circling the drain and when the mkt  corrects big time ( this week ) you should hear the FLUSH !  You guys should get to sleep now because after this week you will be completely exhausted trying to fight off the ACATS out. Sorry , but true

Who is this guy?   Though is he right on LSU's math, might want to do that again LSU.[/quote] The math is extreme. But extreme in the favor of being unlikely. For instance if you were using a hedge fund you could pay 2% upfront and 20% of your gains. So, $500k pays 10k to get in, and if it made 100% return (generating $500k in returns, it would generate, 100k in fees). So I went with a crazy high return rate of 40% which generates 200k in returns and thus 40k in fees. Basically, if you had an extremely expensive year from the point of returns and fees it still makes more sense than doing it yourself (provided you have high enough assets).   For a basic 1% advisory fee it's 5k per year, but that makes the argument all the more rediculous for doing it yourself with a high amount of investable assets.     As for the 20 hours a week being outrageous? You are a fool if you think you can out perform the market and advisory firms materially if you don't spend AT LEAST that amount of time.
Nov 2, 2009 12:38 am

ne

Nov 2, 2009 12:39 am

n

Nov 2, 2009 12:55 am
LSUAlum:

[quote=Mr.Blonde][quote=meletio]75k in fees…are you insane .i’m thinking that was a typo. 20 hours a week research…why?maybe if you’re retarded.this mkt is so easy to trade with zero research. Your B.S. comment does not explain why every major brokerage firm is losing assets faster than they can get them and all of those $ are moving to schwab and fidelity. Smart people realize that you guys are worthless and not anywhere worth the fees you charge. I got some scary news for you also. They are not coming back . Everyone on this forum …( except permabear ) is circling the drain and when the mkt corrects big time ( this week ) you should hear the FLUSH ! You guys should get to sleep now because after this week you will be completely exhausted trying to fight off the ACATS out. Sorry , but true



Who is this guy?



Though is he right on LSU’s math, might want to do that again LSU.[/quote]

The math is extreme. But extreme in the favor of being unlikely. For instance if you were using a hedge fund you could pay 2% upfront and 20% of your gains. So, $500k pays 10k to get in, and if it made 100% return (generating $500k in returns, it would generate, 100k in fees). So I went with a crazy high return rate of 40% which generates 200k in returns and thus 40k in fees. Basically, if you had an extremely expensive year from the point of returns and fees it still makes more sense than doing it yourself (provided you have high enough assets).



For a basic 1% advisory fee it’s 5k per year, but that makes the argument all the more rediculous for doing it yourself with a high amount of investable assets.





As for the 20 hours a week being outrageous? You are a fool if you think you can out perform the market and advisory firms materially if you don’t spend AT LEAST that amount of time.[/quote]



Your math doesn’t take into account the LOSING of money. Of which I haven’t since I fired my broker.



Let’s say I pay a broker 1% of $1 million. $10 grand right? And then a year later it’s at $600k. So I paid $10K to lose $400k? Yeah, that’s worth.



Here’s a little bit better math. I spend a little bit of time developing some trading algorithms. Pay a discount brokerage a few hundred dollars a year in trading costs, and while you are losing your clients’ money, I MADE money.
Nov 2, 2009 12:56 am

Do you have Turrets or something? Why would you waste your time coming onto an advisor forum? Recession got you down? No wait, you’re Chris Hansen of dateline NBC?

Nov 2, 2009 12:57 am

I was hoping to help you realize what kind of crooks you were. Maybe those of you with a conscience will actually find some honorable work. Like ditch digging.

Nov 2, 2009 1:02 am

Oh god, trading algorithms? Did your IT background help you with that. Let me guess, you invested all your money in Mach of this year and now you’re an expert…we run into people like you all the time, when you leave our office we laugh our asses off

Nov 2, 2009 1:03 am

March*

Nov 2, 2009 1:05 am

You won’t ever find me in one of your offices. I’ve been investing on my own since 2000. I lost zero money in this last bear market. How many of your clients’ can say that? Forget March. Those of us who are skilled traders made money even after Oct. 2007.



People like me will end up putting you crooks out of business. Once more people catch on to your ponzi scheme. Take money from the rich, and line your pockets.

Nov 2, 2009 1:06 am

no wait, ever seen office space? you’re Milton! “have you seen my stapler”?

Nov 2, 2009 1:06 am

g

Nov 2, 2009 1:09 am
permabear:

You won’t ever find me in one of your offices. I’ve been investing on my own since 2000. I lost zero money in this last bear market. How many of your clients’ can say that? Forget March. Those of us who are skilled traders made money even after Oct. 2007.

People like me will end up putting you crooks out of business. Once more people catch on to your ponzi scheme. Take money from the rich, and line your pockets.

  Just call us your everyday Robin Hood!   You're a f***ing clown! Skilled trader!   You are affectionately known as overhead in any corporation!
Nov 2, 2009 1:11 am
Mr.Blonde:

no wait, ever seen office space? you’re Milton! “have you seen my stapler”?



Yep, and you're Michael Bolton - A wannabe at everything. Thinks he's a gangster and a Navy SEAL. "What's up G?".

I can't believe you've fooled yourself into thinking you actually help people.

Nov 2, 2009 1:13 am
meletio:

go back to China slant eyes

Oh, you're racist too.   What do you do? Career student? Unemployed? Male prostitute?   Loser
Nov 2, 2009 1:14 am
Mr.Blonde:

[quote=meletio]go back to China slant eyes



Oh, you’re racist too.



What do you do? Career student? Unemployed? Male prostitute?



Loser[/quote]



A chink named Mr. Blonde? Hilarious. Better a racist than a crook.
Nov 2, 2009 1:15 am

a

Nov 2, 2009 1:15 am

What is the connection between Michael Bolton, a gangster, and a Navy SEAL?

  You sound uneducated, that 2 year technical college didn't teach you anything?
Nov 2, 2009 1:16 am

th

Nov 2, 2009 1:17 am
meletio:

ask your mom what I do  ( or did ) Mr. Blonde. 

Just got off the phone with her, crazy guy jerking off in the park when she takes her dog for a walk
Nov 2, 2009 1:17 am

[quote=Mr.Blonde] What is the connection between Michael Bolton, a gangster, and a Navy SEAL?



You sound uneducated, that 2 year technical college didn’t teach you anything?[/quote]



How stupid are you? You are the one who brought up office space. The nerd named Michael Bolton? “Why should I have to change my name - he’s the one that sucks?”.



You can’t even keep track of your movies.



Tard.
Nov 2, 2009 1:20 am

Yeah......I'm going to need you to go ahead and get blown...or in your case, raped

Nov 2, 2009 1:23 am

Good for you. Your memory is starting to come back.



Is that like, “I’m sorry, I don’t remember you telling me to sell you out of those crappy mutual funds”?

Nov 2, 2009 1:25 am
permabear:

20 hours in research. Now I know you are an idiot. People are on here bragging about that they only work 20 hours a week. When do you talk to your clients? You “advisors” are all liars.

I'm referring to the research you should be doing as a DIY investor. Professional money managers spend 40+ hours a week researching and executing their plans.   As for the Advisors on this site, well presumably they have the resources I have to access the information our analysts and managers make available to them. This information is NOT readily available to the public. I'm leveraging their expertise and manhours to manage my clients' money.
Nov 2, 2009 1:26 am

Analysts and managers - the same people who caused your clients’ portfolios to collapse. Keep your access to that “privileged” information.



Nov 2, 2009 1:29 am
permabear:

Good for you. Your memory is starting to come back.

Is that like, “I’m sorry, I don’t remember you telling me to sell you out of those crappy mutual funds”?

What do you do really? Trolls are on this site all the time and before I start into a tirade with censored profanity, I want to be sure you will be here next week.
Nov 2, 2009 1:31 am

Right now, I screw with you.



I don’t need to work anymore since I got rid of the “advice” you people give.



Go tell your daughter to get ready for me.

Nov 2, 2009 1:33 am
permabear:

Right now, I screw with you.

I don’t need to work anymore since I got rid of the “advice” you people give.

Go tell your daughter to get ready for me.

Pedophile. Everything makes sense now. Guess what "I'm Chris Hansen with Dateline NBC"?   By don't need to work, that means your unemployed, it's ok, the recesion has been tough.
Nov 2, 2009 1:35 am
permabear:

Analysts and managers - the same people who caused your clients’ portfolios to collapse. Keep your access to that “privileged” information.

Bottom line, is that professional money management works or else it wouldn't be around.   Would it work better for you? I'd venture a guess to say yes it would. The reason I say guess is because I can't verify any of the information you are espousing. But for the sake of argument, lets say you're right. You have not lost any money in the last 10 years. You fired your broker in 2000 after a huge correction. Congratulations, you knee jerk like many others. Your broker may have been an idiot (every profession has them) I cannot say.   What I can say is that there is no way a DIY investor will consistantly beat the professionals. Your 'algorithims' won't beat the professionals because if it would, they would use it. No 'magic black box for trading' has ever been invented that beats professionals year in and year out. Again, if it did, they would be using it.   The best argument which you aren't even smart enough to use, is either the a) Random Walk theory or b) Perfectly Effecient Market Theory. Both of these can be used to proport to beat the 'professionals' and can be seen with data points that itterate their successes. But then again, you can make the same arguments against them. But both theories basically espouse the Buy and Hold mentality, which if you used, you wouldn't have fired your broker.   Bottom line is you sir, are an idiot.
Nov 2, 2009 1:45 am

“Professionals” are still around because you con men can get grandma and grandpa to buy in.



Yes, I am unemployed. I use the money I make from the market to work from wherever I want. For instance, I’m in California now. I’ll be in New York next week and Spain the week after that. I’ll be spending Christmas and New Years in New Zealand. While you putter around in your backwater.



Oh and I meant your college age daughter. I guess if you’re a chink, they look a little young. But you know, there are Asian porn stars in the making all over the place.



LSU - it’s “purport” not proport. Random Walk and Efficient Market Hypothesis (even the strong form) don’t make returns like I get. Those theories basically say, “my hands are tied”, which is what you “professionals” use to justify your fees.



It appears you are the idiot and one who doesn’t even know how to spell.

Nov 2, 2009 1:58 am

[quote=permabear]“Professionals” are still around because you con men can get grandma and grandpa to buy in.

Yes, I am unemployed. I use the money I make from the market to work from wherever I want. For instance, I’m in California now. I’ll be in New York next week and Spain the week after that. I’ll be spending Christmas and New Years in New Zealand. While you putter around in your backwater.

Oh and I meant your college age daughter. I guess if you’re a chink, they look a little young. But you know, there are Asian porn stars in the making all over the place.

LSU - it’s “purport” not proport. Random Walk and Efficient Market Hypothesis (even the strong form) don’t make returns like I get. Those theories basically say, “my hands are tied”, which is what you “professionals” use to justify your fees.

  You still haven't answered my question "Are you going to be around next week" or is this just a break from the help wanted section of the classifieds?

It appears you are the idiot and one who doesn't even know how to spell.
[/quote]
Nov 2, 2009 1:58 am
permabear:

“Professionals” are still around because you con men can get grandma and grandpa to buy in.

Yes, I am unemployed. I use the money I make from the market to work from wherever I want. For instance, I’m in California now. I’ll be in New York next week and Spain the week after that. I’ll be spending Christmas and New Years in New Zealand. While you putter around in your backwater.

Oh and I meant your college age daughter. I guess if you’re a chink, they look a little young. But you know, there are Asian porn stars in the making all over the place.

LSU - it’s “purport” not proport. Random Walk and Efficient Market Theory (even the strong form) don’t make returns like I get. Those theories basically say, “my hands are tied”, which is what you “professionals” use to justify your fees.

It appears you are the idiot and one who doesn’t even know how to spell.

Perhaps you should study a little if you think you have Random Walk or Effecient Market Theory mastered. It does not in any way suggest that your 'hands are tied'.   RW basically states that individual stock performance has just as much chance to go up or down in a short duration and that they move independently from the market. Over time, stocks go up. So it is saying that 'buy and hold' is the best strategy. EM theory suggests that securities are 'priced fairly' based on all available information. Since there are billions of people with access to information then there is no true 'inside' information. Therefore the only way to outperform the S&P or market is to take on additional risk. Again, this does not suggest that in any way your hands are tied. It suggests that risk v. reward is tangible and measureable and thus the only way to outperform the markets is to increase your risk.   Here's another professional tip for you. I will occassionally misspell words. However, an educated individual or at least someone "proporting" to be one understands what the meaning is an isn't concerned with the spelling. While it is sloppy to misspell, it does not make one an idiot. Talking about something you don't have any idea about, does.
Nov 2, 2009 1:59 am
meletio:

never been a broker douchebag…not a big fan of screwing people out of their money

    YOU GUYS ARE ALL PATHETIC..POSTING ON THIS FORUM EVERYDAY...GET A LIFE ..THERE IS MORE TO IT THAT WORRYING ABOUT WHEN YOU WILL GET PAID FOR FOREFRONT. I WORKED AT WACH FOR AWHILE AND IT TOOK 3 MONTHS FOR THEM TO FIX MYPHONE...7 WEEKS FOR A FIXED ANNUITY 1035...9WEEKS TO TELL US THERE WAS NO RETENTION. HELL, BY THE TIME THEY FINALLY GET AROUND TO PAYING YOU LOSERS THE DOLLARS WILL BE WORTH ONLY 1/2 OF WHAT IT IS NOW.SPEND TIME WITH YOUR FAMILIES.LOSERSSSS     So you were a secretary then? 
Nov 2, 2009 2:13 am

I

Nov 2, 2009 2:18 am

Can you work a little on your penmanship?  I am having a difficult time reading the messages you take for me.

Nov 2, 2009 2:26 am

Meletio is Permabear. He has created Permabear.

Aside from that, all i can say, is, what a bunch of morons.   Regarding tomorrows crash, as predicted by Permetio, doesnt look like its happening.
Nov 2, 2009 2:28 am

clear your inbox bob

Nov 2, 2009 2:35 am
Jebediah:

clear your inbox bob

Clear
Nov 2, 2009 12:52 pm

h !

Nov 2, 2009 1:22 pm
LSUAlum:

[quote=permabear]“Professionals” are still around because you con men can get grandma and grandpa to buy in. Yes, I am unemployed. I use the money I make from the market to work from wherever I want. For instance, I’m in California now. I’ll be in New York next week and Spain the week after that. I’ll be spending Christmas and New Years in New Zealand. While you putter around in your backwater. Oh and I meant your college age daughter. I guess if you’re a chink, they look a little young. But you know, there are Asian porn stars in the making all over the place. LSU - it’s “purport” not proport. Random Walk and Efficient Market Theory (even the strong form) don’t make returns like I get. Those theories basically say, “my hands are tied”, which is what you “professionals” use to justify your fees. It appears you are the idiot and one who doesn’t even know how to spell.



Perhaps you should study a little if you think you have Random Walk or Effecient Market Theory mastered. It does not in any way suggest that your ‘hands are tied’.



RW basically states that individual stock performance has just as much chance to go up or down in a short duration and that they move independently from the market. Over time, stocks go up. So it is saying that ‘buy and hold’ is the best strategy. EM theory suggests that securities are ‘priced fairly’ based on all available information. Since there are billions of people with access to information then there is no true ‘inside’ information. Therefore the only way to outperform the S&P or market is to take on additional risk. Again, this does not suggest that in any way your hands are tied. It suggests that risk v. reward is tangible and measureable and thus the only way to outperform the markets is to increase your risk.



Here’s another professional tip for you. I will occassionally misspell words. However, an educated individual or at least someone “proporting” to be one understands what the meaning is an isn’t concerned with the spelling. While it is sloppy to misspell, it does not make one an idiot. Talking about something you don’t have any idea about, does.[/quote]



Wow, what a professional! It’s not even called the “Efficient Market Theory”. There is a difference between a hypothesis and a theory. It is the “Efficient Market Hypothesis”.
Nov 2, 2009 2:15 pm

Get ready for the market to open, sh!t for brains, instead of typing on the forum. No wonder you lose your clients’ money, you’re too busy posting.

Nov 2, 2009 2:21 pm

x

Nov 2, 2009 5:10 pm

x

Nov 2, 2009 5:26 pm

Reading meletio/permabears’ posts remind me of that WOW South Park episode - and what they probably look like:

  mmorpg-gamer.jpg720×556
Nov 2, 2009 5:28 pm

x

Nov 2, 2009 5:29 pm
meletio:

Nice, did you take a break from jerking off to blueboy.com to find that pic

  Your knowledge of, what I assumed to be, gay porn sites is impressive.
Nov 2, 2009 5:30 pm

1

Nov 2, 2009 5:30 pm
Wet_Blanket:

[quote=meletio]Nice, did you take a break from jerking off to blueboy.com to find that pic

  Your knowledge of, what I assumed to be, gay porn sites is impressive.[/quote]

Talk about walking into one...
Nov 2, 2009 5:32 pm

3

Nov 2, 2009 5:33 pm
meletio:

35 minutes until mkt decline

  I would be impressed.    Let's hope you don't use the weight and influence of your MASSIVE Schwab account to crash the global markets.   p.s. I put an outlook reminder for 1:06 PM.
Nov 2, 2009 5:35 pm

I’

Nov 2, 2009 5:37 pm
meletio:

I’ve also heard of juliachilds.com   doesn’t mean i’m a chef dumbsh#t. I just happen to have knowlegde unlike everyone on this board ( except permabear )

  Umm...are you bragging about knowledge of gay porn sites now?   That kind of knowledge (gay porn sites) isn't something a person just comes across - you need an insatiable hunger for it.
Nov 2, 2009 5:40 pm

I can’t believe you tools are bashing meletio when the market is already declining here at this hour. At some point, you sheep will figure it out. You are just spending your clients’ money without even making things better for them.



Watch it fall, chumps!

Nov 2, 2009 5:41 pm

A

Nov 2, 2009 5:42 pm

Hey buddy, I’m waiting with great anticipation.

Nov 2, 2009 5:43 pm

I

Nov 2, 2009 5:45 pm

Nasdaq just turned negative. What up???

Nov 2, 2009 5:57 pm

o

Nov 2, 2009 5:58 pm

what’s the matter losers? i guess having access to all of those analysts doesn’t help.

Nov 2, 2009 6:06 pm

So does the 30% drop happen right at 1:06pm?

Nov 2, 2009 6:07 pm

it

Nov 2, 2009 6:09 pm

He means Central Standard Time. He didn’t clarify.

Nov 2, 2009 6:10 pm
meletio:

it’s beginning now. it doesn’t gap down …it’s a slow bleed like your business

  How long will this take, because I don't have all day?
Nov 2, 2009 6:11 pm

w

Nov 2, 2009 6:13 pm

No, I’m on my lunch break - you gets those when you are employed.

  I'm starting to get the impression that I am going to be underwhelmed.
Nov 2, 2009 6:17 pm

yo

Nov 2, 2009 6:19 pm
meletio:

you better hurry …your phones gonna start ringing when you loser clients look at the mkt tanking

  Jokes on you!  I don't have clients.  I'm a day trader that fired my FA on Oct 25, 1929.
Nov 2, 2009 6:20 pm

i

Nov 2, 2009 6:25 pm

I get a WI-FI connection in the Walmart break room.  Hah!

Nov 2, 2009 6:31 pm

p

Nov 2, 2009 6:37 pm

Don’t feel bad for the dog…he’s the quarterback.

    ZING!  Couldn't resist.
Nov 2, 2009 6:37 pm

Just out of curiosity what is the catalyst to this clobbering today? What is it that makes you think this? Is it that we break through the resistance of the 200 day moving average?

Nov 2, 2009 6:44 pm

E

Nov 2, 2009 6:45 pm

So what made you choose 1:06 PM?

Nov 2, 2009 6:47 pm

j

Nov 2, 2009 6:57 pm
meletio:

Everyone talks about the money on the sidelines ready to go in. Maybe that money is being used as a replacement for the Lines of credits that people used to use. I , and probably most investors , have some $ on  the sides that will never invest. The mkt rallyed on a BS gdp number and for the most part the earnings have only be good because the bonehead analyst numbers were too low. There was over 1 trillion dollars spent using credit cards and helocs which is GONE for good that $ will never go back into the economy. This is a different world. When you see the mkt rally only because the dollar is going down the tubes that is not a great sign. P/E ratios are too high( especially when the E aint coming back to it’s old levels. But most of all I thought the mkt would go down because everysingle person on CNBC or bloomberg says to buy the dips. The masses are always wrong. Just a gut feeling

So in general you're bearish about future earnings growth and feel that there is alot of money that has left the markets and will never come back (either 'scared money' or just plain vanished due to deleveraging of the consumer). You also thought today would happen because you're naturally inclined to be a contrarian?   Honestly, those are not bad assumptions. I could see an argument for that.
Nov 2, 2009 7:00 pm

Th

Nov 2, 2009 7:02 pm
LSUAlum:

[quote=meletio]Everyone talks about the money on the sidelines ready to go in. Maybe that money is being used as a replacement for the Lines of credits that people used to use. I , and probably most investors , have some $ on the sides that will never invest. The mkt rallyed on a BS gdp number and for the most part the earnings have only be good because the bonehead analyst numbers were too low. There was over 1 trillion dollars spent using credit cards and helocs which is GONE for good that $ will never go back into the economy. This is a different world. When you see the mkt rally only because the dollar is going down the tubes that is not a great sign. P/E ratios are too high( especially when the E aint coming back to it’s old levels. But most of all I thought the mkt would go down because everysingle person on CNBC or bloomberg says to buy the dips. The masses are always wrong. Just a gut feeling



So in general you’re bearish about future earnings growth and feel that there is alot of money that has left the markets and will never come back (either ‘scared money’ or just plain vanished due to deleveraging of the consumer). You also thought today would happen because you’re naturally inclined to be a contrarian?



Honestly, those are not bad assumptions. I could see an argument for that.[/quote]



Doesn’t change you being a crook, like all of your broker buddies.
Nov 2, 2009 7:03 pm

i agree

Nov 2, 2009 7:05 pm

I think permabear is a bad influence on our little meletio.

  Or meletio has split personalities.  Meletio, do you have any gaps in your memory from today?
Nov 2, 2009 7:06 pm

M

Nov 2, 2009 7:07 pm

lo

Nov 2, 2009 7:12 pm
meletio:

Me a split personality…you are a Walmart employed daytrader who lives in Ireland 

  Hahaha....sorry, didn't switch over my profile location from when I was at my summer cottage.  I'm 103 years old for Christ's sake.  I'm lucky to get this auto-computation machine working.
Nov 2, 2009 7:55 pm

Ha

Nov 2, 2009 7:58 pm

[quote=permabear] [quote=LSUAlum] [quote=meletio]Everyone talks about the money on the sidelines ready to go in. Maybe that money is being used as a replacement for the Lines of credits that people used to use. I , and probably most investors , have some $ on  the sides that will never invest. The mkt rallyed on a BS gdp number and for the most part the earnings have only be good because the bonehead analyst numbers were too low. There was over 1 trillion dollars spent using credit cards and helocs which is GONE for good that $ will never go back into the economy. This is a different world. When you see the mkt rally only because the dollar is going down the tubes that is not a great sign. P/E ratios are too high( especially when the E aint coming back to it’s old levels. But most of all I thought the mkt would go down because everysingle person on CNBC or bloomberg says to buy the dips. The masses are always wrong. Just a gut feeling [/quote]


So in general you're bearish about future earnings growth and feel that there is alot of money that has left the markets and will never come back (either 'scared money' or just plain vanished due to deleveraging of the consumer). You also thought today would happen because you're naturally inclined to be a contrarian?
 
Honestly, those are not bad assumptions. I could see an argument for that.[/quote]

Doesn't change you being a crook, like all of your broker buddies. [/quote] Nor does it change the fact that you are an idiot.
Nov 2, 2009 8:08 pm

Why are you editing your posts?

Also, I'm surprised that no one has used the phrase "rip off your head and sh!t down your neck" yet in this thread.

Nov 2, 2009 8:22 pm

Wow, it’s getting ugly in the market.  Looks like that 20% crash call was right on the money.

Nov 2, 2009 8:27 pm

M

Nov 2, 2009 8:36 pm
meletio:

Maybe a little early, but if you have a brain can’t you tell that with three different positive economic numbers and good numbers from ford and the mkt can’t hold it’s gains tells me the mkt is getting a little tired. I know now you are supposed to come back with some type of response where you call me gay or talk about my mom. Or another one of your immature post

So you predicted a crash, markt so far is up 3/4% and you say that you were right anyway?
Nov 2, 2009 8:40 pm

o

Nov 2, 2009 8:43 pm

Someone find this guy and take a dump on his front porch

Nov 2, 2009 8:46 pm

er

Nov 2, 2009 8:50 pm
meletio:

to be honest with you , what really scares me more than the mkt is saturday at 3:00
go Bama

Actually Bama scares me more than the market too. LSU should be able to play with them, but I have more faith in Saban than Miles so I'm concerned.
Nov 2, 2009 8:51 pm

I’

Nov 2, 2009 8:54 pm

Someone find this guy and take a dump on his front porch

Nov 2, 2009 9:06 pm

Quit bonding guys.

  On the bright side, I made money today (apart from my greeter job at Walmart).
Nov 3, 2009 12:20 am

If this thread doesnt bring down the boards as a resource for idea exchange, nothing will.

Makes me long for the days of Bobby and Nancy. Wait - what if perma and mel are one of them - or better - both of them.
Nov 3, 2009 3:24 am

I have to agree Ice

Nov 3, 2009 11:51 am

wait, i’ve been away. just so i have this right…



meletio is a pedophile? that’s not okay. a mod. should throw his ass out of here. not cool at all meletiophile. not cool at all. i thought you were harmless, but you touch kids? yikes. i’d love to meet you so could break your face over my knee.



Nov 3, 2009 12:15 pm

W

Nov 3, 2009 1:10 pm

What makes YOU a joke is that you told us exactly what day the market would crash. When you do things like that, you draw the scorn of intelligent people.

Nov 3, 2009 1:12 pm

what makes you a joke is that you are a joke

Nov 3, 2009 1:19 pm

W

Nov 3, 2009 1:27 pm

Is that all you can say?



The man puts, in capital letters, information about a market crash, and all you people can do is criticize and threaten.



A bunch of internet street toughs, huh?



As for professionals, who do you think you’re fooling? Maybe your clients. I can’t imagine the depth of dishonesty it requires to smile, look your clients in the eye and take their money they worked so hard to earn.



Bank robbers are more forthright.

Nov 3, 2009 1:28 pm

I c

Nov 3, 2009 1:30 pm

N

Nov 3, 2009 2:01 pm

I

Nov 3, 2009 2:23 pm
meletio:

No I’ve never met nor do I know PB. He just makes sense unlike all of you others 

  That supports my split personality theory.
Nov 3, 2009 2:26 pm

I

Nov 3, 2009 3:35 pm

Why do you think meletio and I are the same person? Is it so hard to believe that there are TWO people who can make intelligent posts?



Probably something your feeble minds can’t handle.

Nov 3, 2009 3:39 pm

So you think meletio and I are the same person because of an IP address?

Nov 3, 2009 3:45 pm

W

Nov 3, 2009 3:47 pm

[

Nov 3, 2009 4:07 pm

S

Nov 3, 2009 4:20 pm

no

Nov 3, 2009 4:23 pm

H

Nov 3, 2009 4:27 pm

[quote=meletio] Hey permabear, buy some SDS it looks like the mkts rolling over again

[/quote]



Way ahead of you!

Nov 3, 2009 4:29 pm

I

Nov 3, 2009 4:36 pm

meletio:

  doc, im talking to myself....   when do you talk to yourself?   well doc, its in a web broker chat forum thing   interesting   and doc, i also have multiply personalities......in this chat room   go on.   can we invite your othe rpersonalities here with us now?   perma?   perma  you there?   shoe shine boy?  hello  easy $$$   hello!!!   doc,  i guess im alone.    
Nov 3, 2009 4:41 pm

Yo

Nov 3, 2009 4:45 pm

m

Nov 3, 2009 4:48 pm

It’s amazing what passes for humor among thieves.

Nov 3, 2009 10:34 pm

meletio, so you’re not a broker? huh? maybe i read something wrong, but if you’re not in this business, then what gives? if you are trolling for minor, you’re on the wrong site. i believe all of us are at least in our 20’s. i’m pretty sure there are ‘kid toucher’ forums you can jack off on. this is for stockbrokers, not chesters.

Nov 3, 2009 10:46 pm

I

Nov 3, 2009 11:00 pm

Someone from Citi-  share what you heard on today’s conf. call if you would. I’ve heard some rumors that it was anything but compelling. True?  Anyone at Citi going to stay? If so, why?


Nov 4, 2009 12:57 am

They went over the new compensation plan but it is not yet published. New 35% grid for transactions doesn’t sound so bad.

Nov 4, 2009 2:00 am

35 percent for team comp, or if you stay individual as well?

Nov 4, 2009 3:19 pm

There will be a big cut at Citi very soon…plan Bs in place? 

Nov 4, 2009 4:06 pm

35% for transactions?  I thought C moved to fee-based business effective immediately?  Also, what about reps with LOS greater than 5 years who are subject to a 20% payout?  I believe that LOS penalty box was carried over from the bank-based Smith Barney comp plan.

Nov 4, 2009 4:29 pm

Penalty box 20% is not going to matter much, cuts at the lowest tiers will take care of that- count on that. 

Nov 4, 2009 5:06 pm

what are the details of the cuts?

Nov 4, 2009 6:49 pm

Low end producers getting termed today 

Nov 4, 2009 7:01 pm

hahaha...that sucks!  I wonder what the cutoff was..

Nov 5, 2009 12:59 am

There were a couple let go that I know of, and suspect that there are more to come.  I read somewhere that will be 75 cut across the nation which would look to be about the bottom quintile.

Nov 5, 2009 1:26 am

Regarding the call.  There are still many questions that have been left unanswered.  Management is acting schitzo.  On one hand improving the plan after feeling the pinch of a few top guys leaving (acting as if they care) but on the other hand still not ready to really take difficult questions in an open forum to address peoples concerns(showing they dont care).

People are not feeling the love.  I suspect many are still leaving. Most of the people I know are playing along and at the same time looking at other options.  No one has any faith in management.  It's as if they are making it up as they go.  I still dont understand why they announced anything until their plan was more defined.
Nov 7, 2009 1:49 pm

It’s amazing how one company can screw their advisors so thoroughly as citi has done over the past year. We ae the reason why the clients stayed throughout their turmoil, 5 bailouts, etc…

They have positioned it to were you really have no choice but to join teams of 7 or more reps, forcing you to share sensitive and confidential info with many other reps, can someone please explain How This is Legal and not being contested ?

Nov 7, 2009 4:52 pm
excitr1011:

It’s amazing how one company can screw their advisors so thoroughly as citi has done over the past year. We ae the reason why the clients stayed throughout their turmoil, 5 bailouts, etc…
They have positioned it to were you really have no choice but to join teams of 7 or more reps, forcing you to share sensitive and confidential info with many other reps, can someone please explain How This is Legal and not being contested ?

On the legal side, none of your 'confidential and sensitive' material is confidential from any member of the firm. It's confidential outside of the firm. So, even if you shared the information with every single member of Citi it wouldn't be illegal. It won't ever be contested because it's not against the law.   I'm amazed at how many people have no clue about the law then instantly become lawyers on the internet.
Nov 7, 2009 6:03 pm

Thanks for clearing that up, I never claimed to be a lawyer, that’s why I asked…if you were a client, would you want your rep to tell you, oh by the way, I’m joining forces with 7 other people and they will know your total net worth, you’d holdings, your annual income, etc… I don’t