My EDJ Rant

Oct 18, 2009 11:23 pm

On Friday my Regional Leader was kind enough to call and inform me that
they would be placing another FA  into my very small
town of 8000. He told me to draw a line in the town and suggested I
concentrate my prospecting efforts in preparation for the new guy.  I asked the logic behind such a
decision and it’s all based on their assets model for my area.  Such is
life but now I have to make steps to ensure I’m the only game in town,
I know it’s dirty but what else can I do.  It’s a dog eat dog world. To
this point I’ve been lazy and pretty deliberate in my prospecting
methods, hitting the towns around my area but not my town until my
office opened.  I’ve got a 6-8 month window to prospect the shear hell
out of this place. 


I plan to start knocking on every door within the area I’ll abdicate
and call those houses that no one is home and work my way back into my
"new" area.  I know, I know, I’m a jerk but I’ve already knocked in the
majority of the houses in town and it’s still my area for at least 6
months.  Blame Jones for using numbers rather than logic.


At very worst, my business should explode over the next few months because I've been a total slacker for the last three months. Guess that's the silver lining.
Oct 18, 2009 11:25 pm

Ah. And so it begins…

Oct 18, 2009 11:27 pm

Are there any other small towns around you with no EDJ guy/gal?

Oct 18, 2009 11:31 pm

Yes and two much larger towns with only two reps.  I can’t for the life of me figure out why the guy would subject himself to prospecting a small town that a new guy started in less than a year ago.  Sure it impacts me but it’s going to be that much tougher for them.

Oct 18, 2009 11:39 pm

Volt - I’ve seen instances where newbies don’t have that much of a choice. This is what they do. The people in market research are morons. And the regional leadership follows the “we could put twelve more offices here!” party line.



I hate it for you buddy. Elbow him out. Offer to host him at your office and take his prospects when he quits.

Oct 18, 2009 11:40 pm

Don’t worry about it.  Prospect where you think it makes sense. Don’t let this get between your ears.
Competition is everywhere in this job – banks, independants, DYI-ers, wirehouses. So look at it this way – how much competition will this new guy really be?


Oct 18, 2009 11:46 pm

This is where our model is limited…there is some paper-pusher in the home office that reads a spreadsheet of questionable asset figures and decides without much, if any, research that a town can support more than one FA.

I actually work in a small city next to a large city where there is more than one other broker. I just cold call and prospect in every area that does not have a Jones broker specifically attached to it. I circle out about 30 minutes from my branch. I have found that there is a lot of business that we (EDJ) have never really touched because Jones has never put a broker in the town and most of us are too myopic to prospect outside the city that’s on our business card.

Anyway, don’t panic. As you and I both know, new people (if they make it) aren’t skilled prospectors. If nothing else, you will be able to have a head start stealing business from that whale across the street from you.

Oct 18, 2009 11:51 pm

[quote=voltmoie]On Friday my Regional Leader was kind enough to call and inform me that
they would be placing another FA  into my very small
town of 8000. He told me to draw a line in the town and suggested I
concentrate my prospecting efforts in preparation for the new guy.  I asked the logic behind such a
decision and it’s all based on their assets model for my area.  Such is
life but now I have to make steps to ensure I’m the only game in town,
I know it’s dirty but what else can I do.  It’s a dog eat dog world. To
this point I’ve been lazy and pretty deliberate in my prospecting
methods, hitting the towns around my area but not my town until my
office opened.  I’ve got a 6-8 month window to prospect the shear hell
out of this place. 


I plan to start knocking on every door within the area I’ll abdicate
and call those houses that no one is home and work my way back into my
"new" area.  I know, I know, I’m a jerk but I’ve already knocked in the
majority of the houses in town and it’s still my area for at least 6
months.  Blame Jones for using numbers rather than logic.


At very worst, my business should explode over the next few months because I've been a total slacker for the last three months. Guess that's the silver lining. [/quote]

Wow! What a game-changer...you probably were too successful too quickly so they figured your town could support another Jones office.

I'd guess, the fairy-tale is now over...so get out there and put this other Jones guy out of business!!!


Oct 18, 2009 11:51 pm

The asset base that Jones comes up with is complete suspect, but I have heard recently that they don’t even look at assets anymore… The new goal is population(5,000/advisor) and that is not households but total population. So for example town of 15,000 would get at least 3.



I agree with previous posters that it shouldn’t affect you, however i think mucks up the EDJ image of the existing broker when they higher a new guy.

Oct 18, 2009 11:54 pm

Here is the best part of the story…  My buddy gets a call on Wed. from his RL, he calls to offer him a nice 15mm office.  When mine calls I start thinking, hell yeah … I’m getting an office too. hahaha Needless to say, I was disappointed!

I’m taking it in stride and really did need a kick in the ass.  This has provided it but I can’t lie, it’s annoying and needed to rant a little about it. Thanks for the advice.

Oct 19, 2009 12:10 am

Don’t think of it too much bud. Just whoop some ass and everything will be fine. I do, however, like the idea of hosting him in your office. I grew up in a small town of 1200. 8000 is not much larger., so I know how those small town people work. Let’s face it, if you do well and get in an office, there are not enough people to support that other FA because they will assume that he works for YOUR office. When he says “Edward Jones”, they’ll say, “Oh ya, the office over yonder”. When he quits, you’ll get all his accounts. Just rock it out and by the time he starts doorknocking, he’ll quit because he’ll realize every house he doorknocks has Volt’s name stamped on it.

Oct 19, 2009 1:09 am

Definitely, tell the RL you are splitting the area. Also, reach out to the new guy and tell him how you would propose to split it. Then absolutely pound the area you have proposed to give him to grab any low hanging fruit before he starts. It is your business and if Jones doesn’t want to think logically then screw them. If they want to play games you will beat them at their own.

Oct 19, 2009 1:45 am

That’s my plan, at least part 1 of 5.  After watching the history channel I’m calling  it: Operation OVERLORD

Oct 19, 2009 2:12 am

I wouldn’t feel quilty about any prospecting methods you use now or later.  Chances are he wont be with Jones in 3 years whether it be from failing or switching companies so why worry. 

  When I was at Jones, there were 8 reps in our town.  3 of us were doorknocking at the same time.  I had one prospect say another Jones guy had just been by a few weeks prior.  The indy firm I'm with now, has probably 20+ reps in that same town.  Not to mention every wirehouse on earthis there.  Obviously a bit different compared to town of 8k but there is competition everywhere and I'd just keep grinding it out and not let it affect you. 
Oct 19, 2009 2:18 am
Ronnie Dobbs:

Don’t think of it too much bud. Just whoop some ass and everything will be fine. I do, however, like the idea of hosting him in your office. I grew up in a small town of 1200. 8000 is not much larger., so I know how those small town people work. Let’s face it, if you do well and get in an office, there are not enough people to support that other FA because they will assume that he works for YOUR office. When he says “Edward Jones”, they’ll say, “Oh ya, the office over yonder”. When he quits, you’ll get all his accounts. Just rock it out and by the time he starts doorknocking, he’ll quit because he’ll realize every house he doorknocks has Volt’s name stamped on it.



"yonder"... someone is from Mississippi....
Oct 19, 2009 2:58 am

Volt, I have been with EJ for almost six years, and the first couple of years it used to bother me when they would put another newb in my area. However, since I started approximately 71 FA’s have been hired, trained and quit in my direct marketing area. My region has opened only two offices in six years, only one of those was a newnew and currently we have 12 FA’s out less than 16 weeks. I have learned over the years that doorknocking is more advertising than prospecting. EJ hires anyone with a pulse knowing that 90% will quit or get fired within three years. Whether they stick for three months or three years they will be getting in front of hundreds of people telling them about EJ and when they leave at least one of the people they talked to is going to walk in your office and drop a big rollover at your feet. All because someone whose name they cannot remember left an EJ brochure at the door 18 months ago. Just remember, you are playing King of the Mountain, chances are the newb will quit after the salary runs out. How is that for a recipe!

Oct 19, 2009 1:55 pm
iceco1d:

Spiff,

This can’t be good for your LP buddy! 

  I'd say right now it's neutral.  If volt gets hit butt into gear and makes his office profitable, then it's good for the LP.  The new guy was going to start somewhere.  He just happens to be starting in volt's backyard.  He was going to impact the LP regardless.    volt - I have to tell you that I feel absolutely ZERO sympathy for you.  I think I've explained before that my office is in a metro area.  There are 9 other FAs in my zip code alone.   And a mile down the highway there are two other zip codes with another 9 FAs apiece in them.  I lost track of the number of new FAs we have in this area.  We've got 8 trainees in our region on the system right now and I believe 12 that start in the next 9 months.  So, forgive me if I have a hard time drumming up any sympathy for you.  I'd LOVE to be one of two FAs in a town of 8000 people.  Partly because I know that while the city limit sign may say 8000, there are probably another 8000 that live outside the city limits.  You should be focusing your attention on the Total Liquid Investable Assets of your area, not the population.       The last time I heard the stats on new FAs, they wanted an FA for every $750MM in TLIA.  I can't imagine that they've lowered that stat or just simply gone to a population metric.  I've not heard anything about it in a while, so they might have changed, but I'd be suprised if they did.   
Oct 19, 2009 1:59 pm

Spiff you know those numbers are crap… They include checking accounts and all sorts of garbage.



They may go off the TLIA initially but the new goal also takes into account population.

Oct 19, 2009 2:00 pm

Not to mention that the bulk of those TLIA assets are not Jones target market.

Oct 19, 2009 2:16 pm

Spiff, two points…

  - I choose this town of 8000 because it didn't have an advisor.  There were plenty of other markets around to choose from but I was fairly strategic, maybe you should have been?  Now at that point I didn't know about goodknighting or inheriting an office so in hindsight it might have been foolish.  Jones did tell me at the time the location could service two advisors, but they based that on PRE-CRASH data that I think is crap. I knew it would happen at somepoint, just not so soon.  Life moves on and it is what it is.   - Don't want, don't need, didn't ask for your sympathy.  Like I said, hurts me a little but it's going to be 100% uphill for the new guy because while I don't brag about my numbers like Windy they are rockstarish in a realative sense. Just think it's silly in a non-transistional community to not utlize logic when placing people.   Anyway, I finished complaining about it last night.  Just needed a few days to work it out in my head.  Opertation Overlord is in full swing, back on the phones.  I've got to prospect the new guys territory later today.
Oct 19, 2009 2:24 pm

Here’s a different perspective…

  In my town there are 3 FA's and about 5,000 households.  In addition, we have Smith Barney, Morgan Stanley (still separate offices), Wachovia, Merrill Lynch, 2 Ameriprise offices, and several indy offices.  One town away, we have one of the top-10 indy firms in the nation (assets), UBS, another Merrill office, Stifel, and many, many indy offices.    I recently looked at my book of business.  About 15% of my current clients are actually residents of my town.  I would say 85% of my clients are within a 25 mile radius.    My point is, yes, it seems like a kick in the gut when you have more than one person prospecting in your town.  But the reality is (1) it only matters for a short time, and (2) think about how FEW clients you will actually bring on in the next two years, in the GRAND scheme of things.  Let's say you bring on 30 new households each year for the next two years.  Even if EVERY household is from your town (highly unlikely), that would be 60 households out of several thousand.  And more likely, it would be 60 housholds out of the thousands in your town and all the surrounding towns.   Personally, most of my clients did not come from doorknocking.  That just got me started, and now most of my clients come from referrals, seminars, and networking.  And very few of my new clients are actually residents of my town.  So the whole issue with multiple offices in one town is way overblown.
Oct 19, 2009 2:43 pm

Oh, and our region’s top producer has about 190mm AUM, and is in a town of 4200 households.  Of his 190mm, 52mm is from his town (I assume most of the “Jones Assets” in his town are from his office).

Oct 19, 2009 2:51 pm

You are talking about 3 different groups. Wires, Indy and Jones… Three different clients.

Oct 19, 2009 3:23 pm

Strange, I have pulled clients from all three office types.  So I am not sure how they differ.  Yes, maybe your typical Manhattan wirehouse client is different from a suburban Jones client, but in my area, we are all after the same clients (with some exceptions).  I find it very hard to believe that in my area, I am the only one among all those FA's going after age 50+ clients with 250K+ in investable assets.  The exception would be the old wirehouse advisors that are at the tail-ends of their careers.

I forgot to also mention that we have about 8 different banks/CU's represented in our area, most of which have brokerage departments.    
Oct 19, 2009 4:03 pm

What i meant was, WIRES don’t pay on accounts under $100K on average… Jones has an average of less than $100K accounts

Oct 19, 2009 4:18 pm

Jones as a whole has an average of under $100k per household, but that doesn’t mean B24 does.  His may be way higher than that.  In my metro market there aren’t a lot of people who are looking for only the HNW crowd.  They’re out there I’m sure, but from what I can tell, the indy and wire guys are going after the exact same clients I am, just like B24’s competitors. 

  BTW, I think it's stupid to not get paid on anything under $100K at a wirehouse.  Just one more reason I'll stay where I am.    volt - I'm going to venture a guess that there are plenty of assets in your area.  I don't know if you've found the Region Market Share Reports or not, but the TLIA numbers are on Joogle if you search for them.  I'd guess that in a town of 8000 people, you've got around 4500-5000 households and probably $1.5B or more in TLIA.  That's a lot of money out there to grab.  No, not all of it is truly investable, but a lot of it is.  Figure out how to find your 4% market share and you'll be fine.
Oct 19, 2009 5:56 pm

What is Joogle??

Oct 19, 2009 5:59 pm
Squash1:

What is Joogle??



The latest in Search Engines, and like all things Jones, the greatest. It is the Search button at the top of Jones Link.

I wonder if when people ask questions on here that have already been answered, we should direct them to use Roogle... nope, that's gay.
Oct 19, 2009 6:08 pm

No that is great… from now on when someone asks a repeated questions(more than 10x) I am just going to type Roogle…



WTF is wrong with you Jones people…

Oct 19, 2009 6:20 pm

Don’t hate on our new Joogle search engine. It’s awesome.

Oct 19, 2009 6:39 pm
voltmoie:

Don’t hate on our new Joogle search engine. It’s awesome.

So was your first girlfriend.....
Oct 19, 2009 6:45 pm
Squash1:

No that is great… from now on when someone asks a repeated questions(more than 10x) I am just going to type Roogle…

WTF is wrong with you Jones people…

  Nothing more than you thinking that Joogle is anything other than a funny way to refer to Jonesnet.  You didn't seriously think that Jones named the search function on our intranet Joogle, did you?  Please tell me you didn't. 
Oct 19, 2009 6:48 pm

Did they ever redo the bond trading system… they had been talking about that since I left, wondered if they ever did it…



Oct 19, 2009 6:50 pm

Back on topic…

  Volt, I'm sure you will kill it this next six months, and this poor guy coming in won't be able to touch you. I agree with Windy on this one, you will be Edward Jones to the people in that town.  
Oct 19, 2009 6:51 pm
Squash1:

Did they ever redo the bond trading system… they had been talking about that since I left, wondered if they ever did it…

  Just launched the new system last week. Verdict is still out...
Oct 19, 2009 6:57 pm

It’s a nice system.  One piece of info that I read today was that they’re going to start giving us access not just to our physical inventory, but also to the inventories of other companies.  I guess that would effectively take away the knock that our bond traders aren’t any good or that they only put long bonds into our inventory.  If we can see the inventories of other firms too, then we can basically buy the best on the street.  They did say that they won’t be showing all of the inventories of the other firms, because a lot of it is junk.  Not my words, direct from the Suggbox.   

Oct 19, 2009 8:10 pm

Yeah… sure they are… I think they will show you want they want you to see.

Oct 19, 2009 8:26 pm

They always do…

Oct 19, 2009 8:32 pm
If the only thing we see from the other inventories is long bonds, then we'll know something is up.  Until then, we'll just have to wait and see.  
Oct 19, 2009 11:37 pm

If volt is in a town population 8,000, this is probably 3,000 houses.

After KYC, this newbie needs to make 25 contacts a day…from my experience, this means this guy will be knocking on at least 125 doors (every day) for 8 weeks (total of 5,000 knocks)…and, you guys need to split your town!!!

Sure there are other competitors in town, but there’s not enough doors to knock on…

I had a new guy start in my town in my week #4 of production…sh*t pissed me off!!! I think Jones is putting their partnership success ahead of your (volt’s) individual success. 

Oct 19, 2009 11:45 pm

As annoying as it is, I have seen no evidence, emperical or annecdotal, that more or fewer Jones FA's equates to more or less success.  I would agree that the cities with FA's on every corner may be tougher to start in (i.e. St. Louis), but something tells me that a town of 8000 with 2 FA's should not be an impediment to success.

Oct 20, 2009 12:14 am

My issue has more to do with the prospecting methods we utilize more than the additional body, which Still illustrated well. 

I have knocked on doors in every viable corner of my town with the exception of three / four streets.  A  new guy will go back over every inch of the community I touched trying to reach his numbers which was tough for me and I was the only game in town.  His prospecting of the same people I’m prospecting hurts our image as a company and to some degree my credibility.  Those prospects will begin to wonder if I’m still there, is this person replacing me?  There will also be fatigue on the prospects part.

It’s my opinion my town CAN handle two FAs, at some point.  It’s just not logical to pop them back to back. Especially after you see that someone is growing a viable business. Let it grow to a certain level, nurture it, and then grow.  Growth for growths sake is silly.  That’s there the logic fails…   It’s done though, I’ve moved on mentally.

Oct 20, 2009 12:28 am

If Volt were 3-5 years in and doing pretty comfortably for example spending 1/2 his time with existing clients/service and 1/2 his time prospecting using mainly networking, referrals, targeted cold-calls or cold-walking businesses, etc then it might make sense to bring in a newbie to pound the pavement and pick up the stuff the established advisor (volt) isn’t aware of or won’t get because he’s working smarter now rather than harder.

Having two people spending 100% of their time prospecting a town of 8000 using the same method is just stupid.

Oct 20, 2009 3:50 am

I think Jones puts two new FAs in one town so that when one quits, the other is ready to take over their book. I’m sure this makes sense in St.Louis…but for a new FA trying to build a book, it makes it harder to succeed. I think Volt is getting screwed…

Think of it this way…I would expect 300 clients/households is a good number for a Jones office. If Volt has to split his town, he and the other FA get 1,500 houses to knock. With these numbers, they need to convert 20% of those contacts into clients.

Didn’t Jones say 3% of contacts will become clients…he’s getting screwed!!!

Oct 20, 2009 1:40 pm

I don’t think Jones is that devilish.  I honestly think they just have thier big market penetration map, and anywhere that doesn’t have X number of FA’s per X $$'s and households is an available location.  It’s a bit more complicated than that ( they factor in demographics, density, etc.), but generally, a location either can or cannot accomodate another FA per their metrics.  The country and company is much too big for them to go one by one saying “Oh look, Still@Jones is only out 6 months, and this guy is brand new, let’s put him there so if Still fails, the other guy will take over his accounts”.

When I was new, they gave me a whole list of possible "cross-streets" that I could lcoate and said "go pick one".  I picked the only one that already had an FA in the town.  Why? Because I live there, and the veteran FA said it would be a better location than my other options.  I think Jones is a little less incideous than most people think.  Maybe we disagree with their methods sometimes, but I don't think they mean harm with their methods.
Oct 20, 2009 1:41 pm

Volt - the guy might not even end up in your town.  Didn't you say there were a few towns around you that didn't have anyone there?  If it were me, I'd have lunch with the new FA, tell him that you've already doorknocked the entire town, recently, and that his best shot for new prospects would be to go to one of those other towns during KYC.  Then, tell him to call the RL and tell him that you've done so much prospecting in that town that he keeps running into your prospects.  Tell the new guy that he needs to ask the RL if he can put his office in one of those other towns. 

Unless your RL is a complete jerk, he'll understand the concerns you both have and might actually agree with you.  Otherwise, go get it while you can.  The next guy might outwork you. 
Oct 20, 2009 1:58 pm
Still@jones:

I think Jones puts two new FAs in one town so that when one quits, the other is ready to take over their book. I’m sure this makes sense in St.Louis…but for a new FA trying to build a book, it makes it harder to succeed. I think Volt is getting screwed…

Think of it this way…I would expect 300 clients/households is a good number for a Jones office. If Volt has to split his town, he and the other FA get 1,500 houses to knock. With these numbers, they need to convert 20% of those contacts into clients.

Didn’t Jones say 3% of contacts will become clients…he’s getting screwed!!!

  You're way too short sighted.  Let's say there are only 3000 households.  That's just city limits.  In most areas you can easily double that with the population that lives outside city limits.  Not to mention the other towns in the area that might not have a Jones office.  Those are fair game too.  Now let's talk about businesses.  In a town like that, people have to work somewhere.  Let's say there are 1000 businesses.  Same thing for the other towns.  This would be the reason Jones doesn't define sales territories.    As to the idea that Jones would hire two people and one quits, again, you're dead wrong.  Jones wouldn't give those assets to Volt.  They'd hire yet another new guy and give them to him. 
Oct 20, 2009 2:21 pm

Volt-

I am suprised Spiff hasn't said the obvious...You are an employee, it doesn't matter what you say. They will do what's in the best interest of the firm...not you. The new rep is in there for multiple reasons, if you are doing as well as you say, they know you will prospect for only so long, and then start to scale back. It is sort of a right of passage. Keep your headstraight do the work, forget about what you can't control, and kick ass and prepare for the after life. That usually is at least 30M in AUM and 3-5 years.   For the remainder of your career at any firm where you are an employee there will be annoyances that you will never be in control of. That is part of the trade offs that your firm refers to. Great place to learn, IMO not a place to end your career unless you are comfortable working under their rules.    
Oct 20, 2009 2:35 pm

When I was at Jones, this topic used to drive me up a wall. I wanted the firm to stop trying to add folks until I was a solid Seg 4 office and then I would help add persons that would be successful. The philosophy is to continue to throw people at an area until one sticks, once one sticks keep throwing people at it until two stick. And so on and so on. I don’t believe there is any malice there it is just the way they do business. In a town of 8000 if you have 2 jones reps, there are probably 10-12 other reps that are licensed to do investment business in that town. I would not worry about the Jones people I would be a lot more concerned with the other reps. In my town I had a seg 3 office while another office turned over 4 times all in a year and a half…I finally asked them to just fold that office and roll the assets to me as I got tired of explaining why there was no one there again…they wouldn’t do it. After you get a certain number of reps in a area who wash out at some point the next person will be successful no matter who they are because of the work done in the past.

Oct 20, 2009 3:34 pm

I think a portion of your time should definitely be spent on people you won’t get today. The HNW clients require a longer gestation period of interaction, as still and E24 have said.

  So starting on them today so that they all can say "they knew you when" just puts them closer to bagging big/old money later. Naturally, if don't get at least a little low-hanging fruit you might starve waiting for the corn to get knee high. Just my 02.
Oct 20, 2009 4:54 pm

volt - no offense, but have you ever heard the term “backfill”? Or possibly, more appropriately, “Potential Backfill”?

Oct 20, 2009 4:57 pm

To be honest, I needed a kick in the ass ... this provided it.  My business will profit from it.  Don't think Jones is evil, just stupid about this. 

 From what I understand the "new guy" is still in the interview process or has been extended an offer.  When they get on board I'll take them to lunch.   Still sucks though. Heck I might start a thread about my prospecting in his area to keep me motivated and mention to the new guy what a swell site this is!    
Oct 20, 2009 4:59 pm

Along those lines, someone on here, can’t remember who, segments their clients into three segments:

1. Good for some commissions today, but not long-term clients 2. May be fee-based clients, but not clients I like or enjoy long-term 3. Fee-based clients that I like to work with   I don't think I got it exactly right, but this is a very good way of building a business.  Starting from scratch (or close to scratch), we unfortunately have to take a most of what comes our way.  But one of the important things is to segments your clients and always know who are your "keepers" and who you would give away or not take with you if you left your current firm.  That group should be what you consider your "true" book.  I currently have about 40-50 "keepers" out of a few hundred.  They are the one's that make up my real book.  They also make up the bulk of my assets - the old 80/20 rule.
Oct 20, 2009 4:59 pm
Incredible Hulk:

volt - no offense, but have you ever heard the term “backfill”? Or possibly, more appropriately, “Potential Backfill”?

  Of course but I don't think we operate in that fashion.  Too much growth to do that across the country and our recruitment is simply not that targeted.
Oct 20, 2009 5:02 pm

Total growth numbers for a region are dictated (with some input from the region) from St Louis. Where to actually place the number provided from above is mostly a regional decision. That’s the way it works in our region anyway.

Oct 20, 2009 5:05 pm

I can only comment from my experince.  I dictated where I’d go based upon the assets to advisor formula Jones had in place.  My RL could careless where that was as long as he got another body.  Have no reason to suspect they are pushing someone into my backwoods market to backfill but you never know and it does not change the situation on the ground.

Oct 20, 2009 5:30 pm

[quote=B24]Along those lines, someone on here, can’t remember who, segments their clients into three segments:

1. Good for some commissions today, but not long-term clients 2. May be fee-based clients, but not clients I like or enjoy long-term 3. Fee-based clients that I like to work with   I don't think I got it exactly right, but this is a very good way of building a business.  Starting from scratch (or close to scratch), we unfortunately have to take a most of what comes our way.  But one of the important things is to segments your clients and always know who are your "keepers" and who you would give away or not take with you if you left your current firm.  That group should be what you consider your "true" book.  I currently have about 40-50 "keepers" out of a few hundred.  They are the one's that make up my real book.  They also make up the bulk of my assets - the old 80/20 rule.[/quote]    Absolutely a perfect way to do things. Whether you are at a Bank, Jones, Wire, Insurance you have to have a batch of people that are "keepers" that you get along with and who value your services. When push comes to shove and your firm tries screwing you you are able to pick them up and leave. Even guys who have been at firms for 10+ years have this in mind because you never know when a payout is cut or something shady happens.
Oct 20, 2009 5:46 pm

I like these ideas, I decided to only work with #3 (although at Jones they aren’t really fee based). But clients with money, that I like to work with and like to work with me. I don’t see even bothering with the others. The way I see it is, if you build your business the way you want it (only dealing with good clients), you’ll only have those clients when your book is large. You can also decide later on, the number of clients you choose to have in your office. Ex: 100-200 Cleints with $200,000 or more or whatever number you choose. #1 & #2 (to me) shouldn’t even be a consideration unless you are going for a commission today (Which just causes conflicts of interest, when you are just trying to get a commission from em. #3 clients are going to be clients you get close to and always wanna do whats best for). I don’t see a reason to work with anyone, that doesn’t value what I have to say or causes alot of stress at my office. In my opinion, and this is just ME, if you focus on #3 ONLY, you’ll be alot better off in the long run. It’s worked for me.

Oct 20, 2009 5:55 pm
Ronnie Dobbs:

I like these ideas, I decided to only work with #3 (although at Jones they aren’t really fee based). But clients with money, that I like to work with and like to work with me. I don’t see even bothering with the others. The way I see it is, if you build your business the way you want it (only dealing with good clients), you’ll only have those clients when your book is large. You can also decide later on, the number of clients you choose to have in your office. Ex: 100-200 Cleints with $200,000 or more or whatever number you choose. #1 & #2 (to me) shouldn’t even be a consideration unless you are going for a commission today (Which just causes conflicts of interest, when you are just trying to get a commission from em. #3 clients are going to be clients you get close to and always wanna do whats best for). I don’t see a reason to work with anyone, that doesn’t value what I have to say or causes alot of stress at my office. In my opinion, and this is just ME, if you focus on #3 ONLY, you’ll be alot better off in the long run. It’s worked for me.

  I think its easier to think this when you get off to s blazing hot start.  For the severe majority out there, what newbie is possibly going to look at a prospect that wants to roll over a $50,000 account that is perfect for A shares, get a possible $2,000 gross out of that, and go "Ehhh, I'll pass", when they've got bills to pay and kids to feed?
Oct 20, 2009 5:57 pm

Let me re-phrase that. If someone has below $100,000 and wants to do business, go for it. Just don't expect me to continually prospect someone with less money than that. I may do a repeat contact by phone, but after that I am finished. People with less money than that take forever to transfer over and usually become a problem child because they have $25,000 and think they are your biggest client. My clients with over $200,000 don't require that much work. they understand how things work.

Oct 20, 2009 6:05 pm

Yea, you can usually tell early on if someones gonna take 3-4 meetings to roll over something. For $50k or less, forget about that.

Oct 20, 2009 6:35 pm
Ronnie Dobbs:

I like these ideas, I decided to only work with #3 (although at Jones they aren’t really fee based). But clients with money, that I like to work with and like to work with me. I don’t see even bothering with the others. The way I see it is, if you build your business the way you want it (only dealing with good clients), you’ll only have those clients when your book is large. You can also decide later on, the number of clients you choose to have in your office. Ex: 100-200 Cleints with $200,000 or more or whatever number you choose. #1 & #2 (to me) shouldn’t even be a consideration unless you are going for a commission today (Which just causes conflicts of interest, when you are just trying to get a commission from em. #3 clients are going to be clients you get close to and always wanna do whats best for). I don’t see a reason to work with anyone, that doesn’t value what I have to say or causes alot of stress at my office. In my opinion, and this is just ME, if you focus on #3 ONLY, you’ll be alot better off in the long run. It’s worked for me.

  I agree.  However, you don't always know that someone is going to end up being a dud.  I have a "soft" minimum in my office of $250K, but will swag down to 100K depending on the client and the circumstances.  Basically, I will lower it when the assets are "investable" and they are clients I can work with.  But someone that wants me to move over the 3 annuities they own, and that's the extent of it - no thanks. I recently brought on a client that will probably give me about 10K to start (we're talking SD muni fund money).  But he is young, and is running some kick-a$$ startup businesses that I am hoping will take off.  Those are always keepers.  
Oct 20, 2009 10:23 pm

I established new client rules for myself after I finished PDP:

- Must net me at least $500 unless
 - They DCA money and/or
 - Buy Insurance and/or
 - Are willing to sit down with me after one call and/or
 - Might be a potential referral source and/or
 - I like them and/or
 - Have a nice rack

Just found I don’t have enough time or patience to chase the others.  Once my office opens and I have my Advisory Solutions where I want it my restrictions will increase.

Oct 21, 2009 2:10 am

[quote=voltmoie]

I established new client rules for myself after I finished PDP:- Must net me at least $500 unless - They DCA money and/or - Buy Insurance and/or - Are willing to sit down with me after one call and/or - Might be a potential referral source and/or - I like them and/or - Have a nice rackJust found I don’t have enough time or patience to chase the others. Once my office opens and I have my Advisory Solutions where I want it my restrictions will increase.

[/quote]



good luck with that, if it works youll be set



id be thrilled to net 500, lol

Oct 21, 2009 3:16 am
voltmoie:

I established new client rules for myself after I finished PDP:

- Must net me at least $500 unless
 - They DCA money and/or
 - Buy Insurance and/or
 - Are willing to sit down with me after one call and/or
 - Might be a potential referral source and/or
 - I like them and/or
 - Have a nice rack

Just found I don’t have enough time or patience to chase the others.  Once my office opens and I have my Advisory Solutions where I want it my restrictions will increase.

   - well placed, i was just reading along and then as John Madden would say, BOOM