This one's for you MikeButler!

definition of secret (from dictionary.com):

secret /sikrt/ Pronunciation Key - Show Spelled Pronunciation[see-krit] Pronunciation Key - Show IPA Pronunciation

Definition of cabal:

cabal /kbæl/ Pronunciation Key - Show Spelled Pronunciation[kuh-bal] Pronunciation Key - Show IPA Pronunciation noun, verb, -balled, -balling.

Conspire is the root for conspiracy.  

It looks to me that the above confession is about as good evidence as one can find to support that there is in fact a Conspiracy (whatever form that may be is up for question).

Whether or nor the 'theories' are on the money as to the motivations and methods is certainly up for debate. 

Ok…I know I’m not the smartest guy in the world, but explain one thing to me…How can it be a ‘secret conspiracy’ if you read about it in his autobiography?

[quote=joedabrkr]Ok....I know I'm not the smartest guy in the world, but explain one thing to me.......How can it be a 'secret conspiracy' if you read about it in his autobiography? [/quote]

That's pretty funny, JoeDaMan...

[quote=Indyone]

[quote=joedabrkr]Ok…I know I’m not the smartest guy in the world, but explain one thing to me…How can it be a ‘secret conspiracy’ if you read about it in his autobiography? [/quote]

That's pretty funny, JoeDaMan...

[quote=dude]

.... to build a more integrated global political and economic structure - one world, if you will. If that is the charge, I stand guilty, and I am proud of it."

Note that he says he's guilty of being part of a secret cabal working against the best interests of the United States.

[/quote]

I say I missed the part where he said he was working against the best interests of the US....just where did he say that?

[quote=mikebutler222][quote=dude]

.... to build a more integrated global political and economic structure - one world, if you will. If that is the charge, I stand guilty, and I am proud of it."

Note that he says he's guilty of being part of a secret cabal working against the best interests of the United States.

[/quote]

"For more than a century, ideological extremists at either end of the political spectrum have seized upon well-publicized incidents such as my encounter with Castro to attack the Rockefeller family for the inordinate influence they claim we wield over American political and economic institutions. Some even believe we are part of a secret cabal working against the best interests of the United States, characterizing my family and me as 'internationalists' and of conspiring with others around the world to build a more integrated global political and economic structure - one world, if you will. If that is the charge, I stand guilty, and I am proud of it."

I say I missed the part where he said he was working against the best interests of the US....just where did he say that?

[/quote]

Here you go buddy.

Oh and mike, just to make it clear that statement (about working against the interestes of the US) and the admission of guilt are in the same sentence.  No way around this friend, it is a clear admission.

I will note that this obviously is a long way from making any connection between 911 or any other allegations that the many conspiracy theorists believe.  I just thought it was pretty interesting that David Rockefeller would be so bold to say he is proud of working against the United States interests.

[quote=joedabrkr]Ok....I know I'm not the smartest guy in the world, but explain one thing to me.......How can it be a 'secret conspiracy' if you read about it in his autobiography? [/quote]

Joe,

I was using his own words (secret cabal).  I don't know why he would admit to it.  I would guess that the conspiracy (to do away with the US and absorb it into the fold of a UN-like world government) is not a secret (think NAFTA,CAFTA, Euro etc...), but their methods and approaches to persuading the masses are? 

I happen to be open to the idea that events like September 11th are very persuasive...how else would you convince someone to give up their birthrights other than threatening their safety or by fraud?  The Great Depression motivated alot of folks to give up their gold (real money) for Federal Reserve Notes (fiat money based on debt/indenture) in exchange for Social Security (I'm oversimplifying a little, but the concept is what I'm addressing here).

I think Americans would gladly submit to a 'Global Government' if they were scared enough.

"For more than a century, ideological extremists at either end of the political spectrum have seized upon well-publicized incidents such as my encounter with Castro to attack the Rockefeller family for the inordinate influence they claim we wield over American political and economic institutions. Some even believe we are part of a secret cabal working against the best interests of the United States, characterizing my family and me as 'internationalists' and of conspiring with others around the world to build a more integrated global political and economic structure - one world, if you will. If that is the charge, I stand guilty, and I am proud of it."

I don't believe he was admitting to being a member of a secret cabal but saying that the charge is that he and his family have propmoting an integrated global political an economic structure and he is saying guilty as charged.   It is other people who believe that he is part of a secret cabal..... he never said he was, only that he has been characterized as such by ideological extremists.  You need to read the entire paragraph, not just the last few words.

I have no opinion on this topic.  Just that I think you have misinterpreted his comment and possibly have it out of context with the rest of the statement that isn't shown here.

[quote=dude]I just thought it was pretty interesting that David Rockefeller would be so bold to say he is proud of working against the United States interests.[/quote]

I think that's a bit of a stretch. I think he's "admitting" to ".. to build a more integrated global political and economic structure .." and that others would (and have) consider that a "conspiracy" and "against US interests". 

I don't have much doubt that he considers it IN the US's interests, do you?

aagh proof read first!!  Promoting  not propmoting

[quote=dude]I would guess that the conspiracy (to do away with the US and absorb it into the fold of a UN-like world government) is not a secret (think NAFTA,CAFTA, Euro etc...), but their methods and approaches to persuading the masses are? [/quote]

I think you overstate the aims of this "conspiracy". It could be explained not as an attempt to "absorb" anything, but to lessen the tensions created by excessive nationalism and towards better world co-operation.

[quote=babbling looney]

"For more than a century, ideological extremists at either end of the political spectrum have seized upon well-publicized incidents such as my encounter with Castro to attack the Rockefeller family for the inordinate influence they claim we wield over American political and economic institutions. Some even believe we are part of a secret cabal working against the best interests of the United States, characterizing my family and me as 'internationalists' and of conspiring with others around the world to build a more integrated global political and economic structure - one world, if you will. If that is the charge, I stand guilty, and I am proud of it."

I don't believe he was admitting to being a member of a secret cabal but saying that the charge is that he and his family have propmoting an integrated global political an economic structure and he is saying guilty as charged.   It is other people who believe that he is part of a secret cabal..... he never said he was, only that he has been characterized as such by ideological extremists.  You need to read the entire paragraph, not just the last few words.

I have no opinion on this topic.  Just that I think you have misinterpreted his comment and possibly have it out of context with the rest of the statement that isn't shown here.

[/quote]

My thoughts exactly.

[quote=dude]

I happen to be open to the idea that events like September 11th are very persuasive...how else would you convince someone to give up their birthrights other than threatening their safety or by fraud? ....

I think Americans would gladly submit to a 'Global Government' if they were scared enough.

[/quote]

Actually "scaring" anyone, Americans especially, would cause them to grasp closer their national identity and security, imho.

I never realized that I'm among the illiterate here. 

You all MIGHT be right if he had seperated the issues...but in ONE sentence he states a charge.  In the next he responds to the charge.

There's a comma in the sentence not a period. 

I'm sure David Rockefeller is literate and wrote his sentence correctly. 

[quote=mikebutler222][quote=dude]

I happen to be open to the idea that events like September 11th are very persuasive...how else would you convince someone to give up their birthrights other than threatening their safety or by fraud? ....

I think Americans would gladly submit to a 'Global Government' if they were scared enough.

[/quote]

Actually "scaring" anyone, Americans especially, would cause them to grasp closer their national identity and security, imho.

[/quote]

Yeah, security is the suspension of habeas corpus right?  HAH!  The rights we hold dear are built upon habeas corpus.

Yeah, security is the suspension of habeas corpus right?  HAH!  The rights we hold dear are built upon habeas corpus.

The rights that I hold dear are built on Smith and Wesson.

This is another quote from the above 'Internationalist':

"We are grateful to the Washington Post, the New York Times, Time Magazine and other great publications whose directors have attended our meetings and respected their promises of discretion for almost 40 years........It would have been impossible for us to develop our plan for the world if we had been subjected to the lights of publicity during those years. But, the world is more sophisticated and prepared to march towards a world government. The supernational sovereignty of an intellectual elite and world bankers is surely preferable to the national autodetermination practiced in past centuries."

Hmmmmmm.  I must be wrong here.

[quote=dude][quote=mikebutler222][quote=dude]

I happen to be open to the idea that events like September 11th are very persuasive...how else would you convince someone to give up their birthrights other than threatening their safety or by fraud? ....

I think Americans would gladly submit to a 'Global Government' if they were scared enough.

[/quote]

Actually "scaring" anyone, Americans especially, would cause them to grasp closer their national identity and security, imho.

[/quote]

Yeah, security is the suspension of habeas corpus right?  HAH!  The rights we hold dear are built upon habeas corpus.

[/quote]

Then you haven't had them since Lincoln suspended them? 

I'm really not interested in getting into a Keith Oblermann ()-type "habeas corpus has been suspended" conspiracy trail here. My point is simply if you want Americans to "submit" to some mythical "one world goverment" the last thing you want to do is kill a few thousand of them on their home turf. That will just get their back up and thei flags out.

[quote=dude]

I never realized that I'm among the illiterate here.  [/quote]

 OK, dude, read it your way. He's admited to working against the best interests of the US....

[quote=dude]

This is another quote from the above 'Internationalist':

"We are grateful to the Washington Post, the New York Times, Time Magazine and other great publications whose directors have attended our meetings and respected their promises of discretion for almost 40 years........It would have been impossible for us to develop our plan for the world if we had been subjected to the lights of publicity during those years. But, the world is more sophisticated and prepared to march towards a world government. The supernational sovereignty of an intellectual elite and world bankers is surely preferable to the national autodetermination practiced in past centuries."

Hmmmmmm.  I must be wrong here.

[/quote]

I have a feeling you've been handed a bogus quote, dude.

Mike said:

Then you haven't had them since Lincoln suspended them? 

Reply:

I don't even know what you're getting at here.

[quote=dude]Mike said:

Then you haven't had them since Lincoln suspended them? 

Reply:

I don't even know what you're getting at here.

[/quote]

Lincoln really did suspend habeaus corpus during the Civil War.....

I know that....how's it relevant?

Another quote:

"The main purpose of the Council on Foreign Relations is promoting the disarmament of US. sovereignty and national independence and submergence into an all powerful, one world government".
Chester Ward, Rear Admiral and former Navy Judge Advocate 1956 - 1960 and CFR member for 15 years

Oh and I forgot to quote the source of one of my previous quotes:

"We are grateful to the Washington Post, the New York Times, Time Magazine and other great publications whose directors have attended our meetings and respected their promise of discretion for almost forty years... It would have been impossible for us to develop our plan for the world if we had been subject to the bright lights of publicity during those years. But, the world is now more sophisticated and prepared to march towards a world government. The supranational sovereignty of an intellectual elite and world bankers is surely preferable to the national auto determination practiced in past centuries".
David Rockefeller, in an address given to Catherine Graham, publisher of The Washington Post and other media luminaries in attendance in Baden Baden, Germany at the June 1991 annual meeting of the world elite Bilderberg Group.

And...

"There is no such thing, at this date of the world's history in America, as an independent press. You know it and I know it. There is not one of you who dare to write your honest opinions, and if you did, you know beforehand that it would never appear in print. I am paid weekly for keeping my honest opinion out of the paper I am connected with. Others of you are paid similar salaries for similar things, and any of you who would be so foolish as to write honest opinions would be out on the street looking for another job. If I allowed my honest opinions to appear in one issue of my paper, before twenty-four hours my occupation would be gone. The business of the journalist is to destroy the truth; to lie outright; to pervert; to vilify; to fawn at the feet of mammon, and to sell his country and his race for his daily bread. You know it and I know it and what folly is this toasting an independent press? We are the tools and vassals of rich men behind the scenes. We are the jumping jacks, they pull the strings and we dance. Our talents, our possibilities, and our lives are all the property of other men. We are intellectual prostitutes."
John Swinton, former chief of staff, The New York Times, in a 1953 speech before the New York Press Club

[quote=dude]

Another quote:

"The main purpose of the Council on Foreign Relations is promoting the disarmament of US. sovereignty and national independence and submergence into an all powerful, one world government".
Chester Ward, Rear Admiral and former Navy Judge Advocate 1956 - 1960 and CFR member for 15 years [/quote]

You don't seriously believe that, do you? Any idea who'se been on the CFR?  The list includes Robert Rubin, Maddy Albright, Richard Holbrook, Colin Powell, etc..

[quote=dude]

Oh and I forgot to quote the source of one of my previous quotes:

"We are grateful to the Washington Post, the New York Times, Time Magazine and other great publications whose directors have attended our meetings and respected their promise of discretion for almost forty years... It would have been impossible for us to develop our plan for the world if we had been subject to the bright lights of publicity during those years. But, the world is now more sophisticated and prepared to march towards a world government. The supranational sovereignty of an intellectual elite and world bankers is surely preferable to the national auto determination practiced in past centuries".
David Rockefeller, in an address given to Catherine Graham, publisher of The Washington Post and other media luminaries in attendance in Baden Baden, Germany at the June 1991 annual meeting of the world elite Bilderberg Group.

[/quote]

I think you'll find, if you search further, that reliability of said is dubious, at best. It appeared in the German press, nowhere else, and has been repeated endlessly... 

[quote=dude]

I know that....how's it relevant?

[/quote]

Well, it's relevant in that, while it isn't true today (habaeus corpus being suspended) it was in the past and the Republic survived.

Dude;

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/magazine/3773019.stm

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bilderberg

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Council_on_Foreign_Relations

[quote=dude]

And...

"There is no such thing, at this date of the world's history in America, as an independent press. You know it and I know it. There is not one of you who dare to write your honest opinions, and if you did, you know beforehand that it would never appear in print. I am paid weekly for keeping my honest opinion out of the paper I am connected with. Others of you are paid similar salaries for similar things, and any of you who would be so foolish as to write honest opinions would be out on the street looking for another job. If I allowed my honest opinions to appear in one issue of my paper, before twenty-four hours my occupation would be gone. The business of the journalist is to destroy the truth; to lie outright; to pervert; to vilify; to fawn at the feet of mammon, and to sell his country and his race for his daily bread. You know it and I know it and what folly is this toasting an independent press? We are the tools and vassals of rich men behind the scenes. We are the jumping jacks, they pull the strings and we dance. Our talents, our possibilities, and our lives are all the property of other men. We are intellectual prostitutes."
John Swinton, former chief of staff, The New York Times, in a 1953 speech before the New York Press Club

[/quote]

http://www.constitution.org/pub/swinton_press.htm

Variations on the quote below have been misattributed as a response to a toast, by John Swinton, as "the former Chief of Staff at the New York Times", before the New York Press Club in 1953.

[quote=mikebutler222][quote=dude]

And...

"There is no such thing, at this date of the world's history in America, as an independent press. You know it and I know it. There is not one of you who dare to write your honest opinions, and if you did, you know beforehand that it would never appear in print. I am paid weekly for keeping my honest opinion out of the paper I am connected with. Others of you are paid similar salaries for similar things, and any of you who would be so foolish as to write honest opinions would be out on the street looking for another job. If I allowed my honest opinions to appear in one issue of my paper, before twenty-four hours my occupation would be gone. The business of the journalist is to destroy the truth; to lie outright; to pervert; to vilify; to fawn at the feet of mammon, and to sell his country and his race for his daily bread. You know it and I know it and what folly is this toasting an independent press? We are the tools and vassals of rich men behind the scenes. We are the jumping jacks, they pull the strings and we dance. Our talents, our possibilities, and our lives are all the property of other men. We are intellectual prostitutes."
John Swinton, former chief of staff, The New York Times, in a 1953 speech before the New York Press Club

[/quote]

http://www.constitution.org/pub/swinton_press.htm

Variations on the quote below have been misattributed as a response to a toast, by John Swinton, as "the former Chief of Staff at the New York Times", before the New York Press Club in 1953.

[/quote]

Thanks for clearing that one up Mike. 

[quote=dude][quote=mikebutler222][quote=dude]

And...

"There is no such thing, at this date of the world's history in America, as an independent press. You know it and I know it. There is not one of you who dare to write your honest opinions, and if you did, you know beforehand that it would never appear in print. I am paid weekly for keeping my honest opinion out of the paper I am connected with. Others of you are paid similar salaries for similar things, and any of you who would be so foolish as to write honest opinions would be out on the street looking for another job. If I allowed my honest opinions to appear in one issue of my paper, before twenty-four hours my occupation would be gone. The business of the journalist is to destroy the truth; to lie outright; to pervert; to vilify; to fawn at the feet of mammon, and to sell his country and his race for his daily bread. You know it and I know it and what folly is this toasting an independent press? We are the tools and vassals of rich men behind the scenes. We are the jumping jacks, they pull the strings and we dance. Our talents, our possibilities, and our lives are all the property of other men. We are intellectual prostitutes."
John Swinton, former chief of staff, The New York Times, in a 1953 speech before the New York Press Club

[/quote]

http://www.constitution.org/pub/swinton_press.htm

Variations on the quote below have been misattributed as a response to a toast, by John Swinton, as "the former Chief of Staff at the New York Times", before the New York Press Club in 1953.

[/quote]

Thanks for clearing that one up Mike. 

[/quote]

YW, it's the downside of the internet that no one knows you're a dog 

That's the crap I hate about the conspiracy movement...they often misquote people.  I also don't enjoy the 'hundreds' of competing theories on who 'dunnit 'and why...it certainly challenges the validity of the whole movement.

I wish they'd just stick to the facts and not get into so much speculation.

I believe that what is percieved as a 'conspiracy' is actually just a group of wealthy powerful individuals and groups trying to maintain or increase that wealth and power. 

Of course they want to keep their ideas secret/private...especially the ideas (which are indisputable) surrounding the uniting of world governments.  Who is stupid enough to broadcast their strategy to everyone else, whether it be financial or political?  That's a sure fire strategy for failure. 

From time to time one or more of these people (either independently or as part of a syndicate) are probably guilty of breaking laws and/ playing 'unfair' or arranging events which leverage their influence to bring about political/social conditions that favor their interests, which seems completely natural and plausible to me.

To me it is a matter of these folks trying to maintain staus and power for themselves and their dynasties.  The problem arises since they influence so many parts of our lives either directly or indirectly by being part of the nations most influential think tanks and governmental advisory commitees in addition to being the financiers of our economy and philanthropic institutuions.  Secrecy in those matters is a major concern to me...especially when their good buddies are the ones calling the shots and sending my fellow Americans off to war. 

For example Dick Cheney was a CFR member and I saw him admit to fraudulently OMITTING that fact when he was running for office in Wyoming while addressing the CFR on a televised event(...it elicited laughs from the CFR attendees.  Yeah, lies of ommission in order to conceal facts about oneself is funny....right.

These are the guys you stand behind Mike?

[quote=dude]

That's the crap I hate about the conspiracy movement...they often misquote people..... 

I wish they'd just stick to the facts and not get into so much speculation. [/quote]

If they stuck to facts and didn't make up quotes they'd have nothing to say. It's like telling a dog not to lick, well, you get the picture..

[quote=dude]For example Dick Cheney was a CFR member and I saw him admit to fraudulently OMITTING that fact when he was running for office in Wyoming while addressing the CFR on a televised event(...it elicited laughs from the CFR attendees.  Yeah, lies of ommission in order to conceal facts about oneself is funny....right.

These are the guys you stand behind Mike? [/quote]

I have no idea what you're talking about, I don't know if Cheney was ever in the CFR, but I can assure you that among rational people there would be no need to deny it.

[quote=dude]

For example Dick Cheney was a CFR member and I saw him admit to fraudulently OMITTING that fact when he was running for office in Wyoming while addressing the CFR on a televised event(...it elicited laughs from the CFR attendees.  Yeah, lies of ommission in order to conceal facts about oneself is funny....right.

These are the guys you stand behind Mike?

[/quote]

Having done a quick Google, I found the following from a nutjob conspiracy website. I can only assume you're talking about Cheney's joke at the end, the one that was cut off when the ominous music starts...

http://www.infowars.com/articles/nwo/video_cheney_talks_to_c fr.htm

Dude, btw, I don't know what your views are of these anti-CFR/one world gov't conspiracy theories are, so this isn't an attack on you, but you do realize these guys are the orginial "black helicopter" people, right?

black helicopter?

[quote=mikebutler222][quote=dude]

For example Dick Cheney was a CFR member and I saw him admit to fraudulently OMITTING that fact when he was running for office in Wyoming while addressing the CFR on a televised event(...it elicited laughs from the CFR attendees.  Yeah, lies of ommission in order to conceal facts about oneself is funny....right.

These are the guys you stand behind Mike?

[/quote]

Having done a quick Google, I found the following from a nutjob conspiracy website. I can only assume you're talking about Cheney's joke at the end, the one that was cut off when the ominous music starts...

http://www.infowars.com/articles/nwo/video_cheney_talks_to_c fr.htm

[/quote]

MikeB it wasn't a joke, he was telling the truth and the crowd thought it was funny.  He thought it was funny that he 'ommitted' the fact that he was a CFR member.  You LOVE the spin eh?

Just because I see something on a website does not mean that I endorse that website or even necessarily buy into their paradigm. 

I was interested in that video and yes it was cut a little short....never the less, I don't think it's funny that my Vice President made a lie of ommission, do you?

[quote=dude]

Just because I see something on a website does not mean that I endorse that website or even necessarily buy into their paradigm. 

I was interested in that video and yes it was cut a little short....never the less, I don't think it's funny that my Vice President made a lie of ommission, do you?

[/quote]

"A lie of ommission"? You're not serious, are you? Can you spot a joke when you see one? He's (and the audience too) where chuckling at the sort of nutjobs who made that video, added the scary music and clipped his comment.

[quote=no idea]black helicopter?[/quote]

Right, the loons who swear they see "black helicopters" (probably US Army choppers painted with IR reflective dark paint), part of the military arm of the shadowy "one world government" that's been installed to take over <?:namespace prefix = st1 ns = "urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:smarttags" />US sovereignty. The same people who see the UN in the same light and think everyone from Reagan to Clinton were in on it.<?:namespace prefix = o ns = "urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" />

I’m definitely not a ‘black helicopter’ guy.

[quote=dude]I'm definitely not a 'black helicopter' guy.[/quote]

Just letting you know who you're jumping into bed with when you start thinking of the CFR or Rockefeller as some evil conspiracy.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I49AZU4rD3s&mode=related& amp;search=

This documentary is probably the most cohesive and reasoned history of the 'conspiracy' I have seen.  This is part one of a seven part series (each about 9 1/2 minutes long).

If I were to buy into a particular 'theory' (jump into bed with) this would be it.

Sorry, no black helicopters Mike. 

[quote=dude]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I49AZU4rD3s&mode=related& amp; amp;search=

This documentary is probably the most cohesive and reasoned history of the 'conspiracy' I have seen.  This is part one of a seven part series (each about 9 1/2 minutes long).

If I were to buy into a particular 'theory' (jump into bed with) this would be it.

Sorry, no black helicopters Mike. 

[/quote]

“The powers of financial capitalism had a far-reaching plan, nothing less than to create a world system of financial control in private hands able to dominate the political system of each country and the economy of the world as a whole…Their secret is that they have annexed from governments, monarchies, and republics the power to create the world’s money…”

Yeah, no black helicopters there.. 

I'm sorry that you don't have the patience to watch the whole program.  You're brain is too occupied knowing all things simultaneously. 

The program cites some of the most respected people in American history (Lincoln, Hamilton, JP Morgan etc...) and draws some links between certain events and the comments, news and common knowledge of the day.  I thought it was a well reasoned and persuasive argument....but you wouldn't know since you stopped after the first minute. 

I really don't care about this that much frankly.  I do enjoy challenging your perceptions though Mike....you are reliably over reactive.  Keeps me entertained to know that there's a guy working at Morgan Stanley who has as much time as I do to screw around here.

[quote=dude]

I'm sorry that you don't have the patience to watch the whole program.  You're brain is too occupied knowing all things simultaneously.  [/quote]

Ever considered it's that I don't share your interest in conspiracy theories and how the entire world is run by a handful of "money changers"?

[quote=dude]The program cites some of the most respected people in American history (Lincoln, Hamilton, JP Morgan etc...)...[/quote]

It does what every conspiracy theory does, it takes comments out of context, twists their meanings and weaves them into a convoluted theory...

 [quote=dude]I thought it was a well reasoned and persuasive argument....[/quote]

We've disagreed before when you've said that very thing about other theories....

[quote=dude]

I really don't care about this that much frankly.  I do enjoy challenging your perceptions though Mike....you are reliably over reactive.  [/quote]

Yawn... you ask me to comment on something for you, and when I I'm friendly enough to do so, and point out it's hokum, you tell me I'm over-reacting. You don't "challenge perceptions", dude, you give us interesting insights into what you find "well reasoned and persuasive"....

[quote=dude]Keeps me entertained to know that there's a guy working at Morgan Stanley who has as much time as I do to screw around here.[/quote]

I guess I struck a nerve to get that response, dude. Happy to bring a little sunshine to your day

Thanks Mike.  You’re a true gentleman.