Social Security and Government Employees Part 3: Government Pension Offset

Social Security and Government Employees Part 3: Government Pension Offset

The reduction of spousal benefits 

In earlier articles, I looked at certain types of government employees who’ve worked previously with a “non-covered” pension.  That is, they worked at a job where they didn’t have to pay Social Security (SS) withholding taxes, but got a separate pension from the “non-covered” work they did.  A typical example would be certain state and municipal employees. The federal government has ways of adjusting SS benefits to reflect this using the windfall elimination program (WEP).  Now, I’ll discuss the government pension offset (GPO), which is used to reduce SS spousal benefits to offset the perceived “windfall.”

As I mentioned previously, note that some government employees aren’t covered for SS benefits.  Some federal, state or local government employers provide employer-sponsored retirement programs for their employees.  Federal government employees hired after 1983 generally pay SS withholding, so they don’t have to worry about this.  The GPO comes up when the employee has a non-covered pension, yet may otherwise qualify for a SS spousal benefit.  The non-SS covered retirement program is essentially considered to be in lieu of SS.

A Response to “Double Dipping”

Let’s run through a simple example.  Spouse A is age 66 and has a primary insurance amount (PIA) of $2,000.  Spouse B is also age 66 but never worked outside the home.  So if they both applied today, Spouse A would get a personal benefit of $2,000 per month and Spouse B, despite not qualifying for a personal benefit, would get a spousal benefit equal to $1,000.

Now let’s change things a little.  The truth is that Spouse B actually did work outside the home.  It’s just that he actually was a state employee who never paid into SS but gets a pension from that work.  Assume that pension is $3,000 per month, in other words, more than Spouse A’s SS benefit. 

So under those circumstances, is it really fair that the spouse would receive the same benefit as a spouse who never actually worked outside the home?  It almost seems like double dipping.  Thus, the government came up with GPO.  Thankfully, GPO is much easier to understand than the previously covered WEP.

GPO Applicable to Spousal Retirement Benefits

GPO reduces the spousal retirement benefit payable to a worker who also receives a non-covered SS pension. The GPO benefit reduction is equal to two thirds of the pension from non-covered SS employment.

Note the basic difference between WEP and GPO.  WEP is applicable when a non-covered employee has his own SS benefit.  GPO is applicable when the non-covered employee may qualify for the SS spousal benefit.  Keep in mind that in most circumstances, an individual can collect a spousal benefit even if he never qualified for a SS benefit at all.  This is one practical issue that distinguishes GPO from WEP.

Example:   Assume your client is age 66 and has never had his own SS benefit, but has filed for a spousal benefit.  If his spouse has a PIA of $2,000, under normal circumstances, he would qualify for a spousal benefit of up $1,000 per month when he reaches full retirement age (FRA).  In this case, let’s assume he also receives a $900 month pension benefit from his non-covered employment. The GPO provision will cause his projected $1,000 SS spousal benefit to be reduced.

Amount of GPO Reduction

The GPO formula is relatively simple. The spousal benefit will be reduced by two-thirds of the amount of the non-SS retirement benefit.  So in this case, the $900 benefit will cause a reduction by two-thirds, or $600.  Instead of getting a $1,000 spousal benefit, he'll only get $400.

One question that may jump out at you at this point:  Can GPO completely eliminate the spousal benefit?  The answer is yes.  This is one key difference between WEP and GPO.  In this example, if your client’s non-covered pension were $1,500 or more, there would be no SS spousal benefit at all.

GPO will affect survivor benefits as well.  Remember that the PIA, which doesn’t include deferred retirement credits (DRCs), is used to calculate the 50 percent spousal retirement benefit.  However, the actual retirement benefit (not the PIA), which does include DRCs, is used to calculate the 100 percent surviving spouse’s benefit. 

GPO Reduction of Surviving Spouse’s Benefit

Now let’s assume the other spouse began collecting at age 70, but died shortly thereafter.  Her $2,000 benefit will already be enhanced by four years of 8 percent DRCs to $2,640.  The spouse’s widower’s benefit would normally be 100 percent of the full $2,640 retirement benefit.  But the GPO is still in effect.  Thus, the $600 GPO reduces his widower’s benefit to $2,040.

Can someone be subject to both WEP and GPO at the same time?  Certainly.  So both a personal benefit and a potential spousal benefit can be reduced for someone with a non-covered pension. 

As I noted in an earlier article, GPO and WEP are some of the more difficult SS concepts to grasp.  But if you’re working with government employees, chances are good that it’s going to come up.  So you need to understand at least the basics.

Hide comments

Comments

  • Allowed HTML tags: <em> <strong> <blockquote> <br> <p>

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
Publish