WFA + Jim Cramer

or Register to post new content in the forum

11 RepliesJump to last post

 

Comments

  • Allowed HTML tags: <em> <strong> <blockquote> <br> <p>

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
Aug 7, 2009 4:04 pm

Anybody else get just a taste of throw up in the back of their throat when they listen to a recap of mad money on the morning call?

 
My God has it truly come to this???? We cant get better material than that???
 
Aug 7, 2009 4:10 pm

You think you shouldn't be informed of things a client might call you about?  I had three clients call me today about Cramer's Citigroup BS. 

Aug 7, 2009 4:11 pm

I think we should have our own analysts and not count on some loud mouth entertainer on TV. Maybe we can have Suze Orman included in the lineup. She can give the compliance updates. Maybe Vince the Pitchman for the sales portion.

 
Yeah, if you buy in the next 5 minutes we can even write an option on it! BUT YOU KNOW we can't do this all day...  So call now.
Aug 7, 2009 5:24 pm

Hey, Jim Cramer is an honest, hardworking, intelligent and capable analyst telling it like it is...at least that's what Jim Weddle told me today 

Aug 7, 2009 7:51 pm
Gaddock:

Anybody else get just a taste of throw up in the back of their throat when they listen to a recap of mad money on the morning call?

 
My God has it truly come to this???? We cant get better material than that???
 
 
I obviously didn't hear that call, but that would annoy me also. Similar to last month when JPMC had Steve Moore from WSJ on our Wednesday evening call talking about the positives he sees in the economy and then later that week he was on Kudlow saying he sold out all of his investments the first day the Dow hit 9k. The stiff had two different viewpoints in three days ! Great material !
Aug 7, 2009 8:06 pm
Gaddock:

Anybody else get just a taste of throw up in the back of their throat when they listen to a recap of mad money on the morning call?

 
My God has it truly come to this???? We cant get better material than that???
 



Running out of things to complain about?

Aug 7, 2009 10:08 pm

honestly dont see how he stays on.   he flat out lies.  constantly.

check utube.  prett funny the absolute contradictions.  
Aug 8, 2009 7:36 am
Hydeho:
Gaddock:

Anybody else get just a taste of throw up in the back of their throat when they listen to a recap of mad money on the morning call?

 
My God has it truly come to this???? We cant get better material than that???
 



Running out of things to complain about?

 
Somehow I think there will always be something new around the corner. Before you start calling me a coward for staying on ... They are getting ready to give me a $62k+ bonus and $12.5k tax free for expenses.
Aug 8, 2009 7:41 am
A b:

honestly dont see how he stays on.   he flat out lies.  constantly.

check utube.  prett funny the absolute contradictions.  
 
I can't count the hypocrisy of Cramer. Last time I watched his show he was screaming left and right  BUY NO BANKS BUY NO BANKS!!!!!!! BLA BLA YADA YADA.
 
The comes the lightning round and he tells a guy he needs JPM and WFC in his portfolio.
 
Same show, OMG + WTF. If you want to know what Cramer is about get a copy of the disclaimers that flash by the screen at the beginning of his 'show'.
Aug 10, 2009 9:58 am

In 2007 Business Week (I think), analysed Cramer's picks, then updated their numbers last year.  Cramer lagged the market during the bull phase and would have lost more money in 08.   Cramer's response:  threat of lawsuits, disclaimers on his show and refusal of access for Business week.

 
Whenever a client brings up Cramer, I ask them if they are familiar with his background as a hedge fund manager- his fund imploded and lost a ton of money.  Then I ask rhetorically, if Cramer is so good, why isn't he manageing money for indivuals, instead of screaming on TV ? 
 
 
Aug 10, 2009 7:54 pm

Not to mention he openly admitted to market manipulation. Who in the world would want any association when you are (at the home office) constantly giving lip service to "do what's right for the client" by ahhh not cheating that is.

 
Is there anybody in the world that doesn't think that his buddies aren't front running the crap he preaches?