Wachovia Sec Sux

or Register to post new content in the forum

11 RepliesJump to last post

 

Comments

  • Allowed HTML tags: <em> <strong> <blockquote> <br> <p>

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
Jan 19, 2010 12:17 am

Wachovia Sec is a wholly owned sub of WFA and is still being run by a bunch of morons.  The only thing that WFA controls right now is the bi weekly pay and HR Benefits.  The bi pay stinks but the benefits are 100% better than what the crooks at WS offered.  The management that runs WFA, the same WS asshloes, cant get anthing right.  Just check out how they fckued up the FAEMS.  Dkheads.

Jan 19, 2010 1:34 am

What are you talking about with regard to FAEMS?

Jan 19, 2010 1:36 am

Tell us something we don't know. And what the he'll is this 25 percent tax on commision.

Jan 19, 2010 1:38 am

Faems seems to be the correct amount when I saw it over the weekend. Something else?

Jan 19, 2010 6:46 am

Its Hope and Change for the FAT CAT bankers!  (sorry, couldn't resist)  But be happy Dodd is retreating, insiders tell me that Banks were going to be lending and depository only. 

 
Tell me what firm forced to be bought by a bank last year could survive on their own without the bank ownership?  Could have been real devastation.
Jan 19, 2010 12:12 pm

It must really suck to be there, but you guys have to admit you were warned on this forum and some common sense how screwed up it would be.

And you chose to stay.
 
Get out, why would any good rep or employee ever stay with a crooked firm?  
Jan 19, 2010 8:54 pm

It amazes me how much worse things have gotten, and all the complaints I still hear yet brokers still stay...if you dont like it man up and leave! I have been gone a year and never been happier...that goes for clients as well! Good luck to the few that are left!

Jan 19, 2010 9:18 pm
Greenbacks:

It must really suck to be there, but you guys have to admit you were warned on this forum and some common sense how screwed up it would be.

And you chose to stay.
 
Get out, why would any good rep or employee ever stay with a crooked firm?  
 
Typical ... you tell us the obvious yet have no solutions vs. going indy. There are reasons why it doesn't make sense for some to do so.
 
Does it make you feel good stating the obvious?
 
Wow you really let us know where you stand, thanks for that, yawn. 
Jan 19, 2010 9:25 pm
Greenbacks:

It must really suck to be there, but you guys have to admit you were warned on this forum and some common sense how screwed up it would be.

And you chose to stay.
 
Get out, why would any good rep or employee ever stay with a crooked firm?  
 
It sucks... you happy? You sound like a Democrat who was happy the war in Iraq was going bad just so you could brag about it. Guess you're not familiar with the training contract. OR quite a few other reasons one would not jump ship just yet.
 
Do you know what the contract is for folks less than 5 years?
 
Answer = no
 
You may want to consider more than your bitter little world before painting with such a broad stroke. Fact is WFA has a better contact than any wire in a big way.
Jan 19, 2010 11:13 pm

I like WFA.  Like it a lot.  I think the current withholding on commission is a joke, but otherwise I couldn't be happier.  A lot of the bitching seems to be warranted, but just as much seems to come from people that would bitch no matter where they are.  Just my 2 cents. 


Jan 20, 2010 2:56 am

Speaking of wachovia sux. Anyone receive their docs for forefront for sep snapshot?