Advisers Rate Indie Broker Dealers

or Register to post new content in the forum

 

Comments

  • Allowed HTML tags: <em> <strong> <blockquote> <br> <p>

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
Oct 25, 2010 1:59 pm

Commonwealth wins, Cambridge second, RJ third...

For more...

http://www.investmentnews.com/article/20101022/FREE/101029956

http://www.investmentnews.com/article/20101022/FREE/101029963

Oct 25, 2010 2:01 pm

In the 6 Big BDs, MSSB last place, EDJ first place.

Oct 30, 2010 7:26 am

Good for Cambridge Investment Research and Commonwealth and the others who received good marks.  Seems more and more surveys are taking place these days.  What I've seen as a trend (in my eyes only perhaps) is that a good number of Registered Reps are affiliating also (or exploring the possibility) of joining small B/D's many of which are unknown.  I believe the total number of B/D firms today in the U.S. total nearly 5,000 -- that is a lot of choices!

Some might follow the herd and others might be looking for their own trail.  As long as your happy, regardless of where you land, to me, thats the most important decision after all.  I say "congrats" to all broker-dealers, large and small, who treat their Advisors as business owner clients.  The biggest gripe I have with the less than admirable B/D firms are the ones that do not disclose all of their costs of doing business to the potential advisor from the get go, instead of hiding it in some large manual (page 123, paragraph 2, section A, subset G in 5 point font)!!

Advisors are running a business and as such, they need to know their TOTAL COSTS of doing business from the get go as opposed to being surprised when they see a commission statement.  Now, if all B/D's did this -- we'd all be winners!

Oct 30, 2010 10:16 am

I think you are going to continue to see consolidation in the B/D world because of increase costs (compliance etc)..