Unnamed Respondent Wins Expungement (?)

or Register to post new content in the forum

 

Comments

  • Allowed HTML tags: <em> <strong> <blockquote> <br> <p>

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
Nov 15, 2010 9:16 am

Unnamed FINRA Arbitration Respondent Wins Expungement -- What??http://www.brokeandbroker.com/index.php?a=blog&id=639

The Flannerys were not happy with Merrill Lynch and filed a FINRA Arbitration Statement of Claim against their brokerage firm. And we're not talking chump change here. The unhappy customers were suing for several millions of dollars.

If you read the caption to the case, it's quite straightforward: the Flannerys versus Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. So, how did Michael Duke Laitman get involved in this mess. And of even greater interest, why did he need to get his industry record expunged?

Unnamed FINRA Arbitration Respondent Wins Expungement -- What??http://www.brokeandbroker.com/index.php?a=blog&id=639