Capitalizing on ETF Price Wars
In January we wrote a story about the affect ETFs are having on the brokerage business --- to wit, it may dampen profitability. In our story from January, we wrote: http://bit.ly/gjVpJ8 :
"iShares, which was purchased by BlackRock in June 2009 as part of its acquisition of Barclays Global Investors, has been the market leader in the exchanged-traded funds space for much of the past decade, and it still holds first place. (See table, page 44.) But in November 2009, Charles Schwab burst onto the ETF scene, a move that shook up the prevailing order and altered the asset management industry at large. Lots of investors wanted to talk to Chuck. Why? Lower fees. That fall, Schwab launched four funds with fees well below market rates, undercutting some of the biggest players in the space, including iShares, Vanguard and State Street Global Advisors. The price war was in full swing."
Brad Hintz, a senior analyst at Bernstein and a former CFO of Lehman (way back in the day), doesn't necessarily agree that a price war has begun, but he did say in a 16 Dec. research report, "Down with ETF free riding! Over the long-term the growth in ETFs will impair profitability of retail distribution channels. ETFs remain only a fraction of the $23 trillion global funds market, but they have grown rapidly to $1 trillion in global AUM and boast 54% CAGR since 1993 versus 11% for mutual funds. ETFs are chipping away at the market share of mutual funds and no longer can be ignored by the brokers."
My question to the forum: How have ETFs/ETNs affected your business? I know many FAs use ETFs (indexes and "fundamental" indexes) to capture beta and use other active managers to capture alpha. One FA told us that ETFs have actually helped him gain assets --- investors like their low costs, obviously. How are you using them? Will a "price way" break out? Hintz says "If there is to be a war, it is between the brokers and the ETF sponsors." He adds, "It is undeniable that ETFs threaten the economies of third-party distribution channels, and, this, of course, was the impetus of Schwab's decision to enter the ETF management business."
What say you? Are you worried that diminished profitibility of your firm will negatively affect your payout and other perks?
It isn't the expense ratio that matters, it's the alpha, and also the accuracy of tracking. Our industry cannot offer much more in the way of heightened returns from cost cutting. We need "top line growth"...
I like using ETF holdings to increase exposure to very specific areas. It could be a sector, or it could be a specific box in the style box of equities. I also like the added sense of safety that the underlying asset isn't so exposed to stupidity, corruption, or a manager that is actually bearish on what I'm bullish on.
I manage by over/under in sector and style box as a unique element. My clients like that concept, easy to understand. It also gives me something to do on a more regular basis for the client, gets me a bit more actively involved in the management of assets, without becoming a speculator.
I'm transactional, and they pay no trails. But, it's in the best interest of the client...