The BULL everyone hates

Nov 5, 2009 5:45 pm

NEXT: blow right through spx 1100ish. (massive oct 08 gap)



The run to 1200 will be so quick you shorts/bears/cash pussies are



gonna want the CHEESE bad again instead of wanting out of trap



like in march.



This is wonderful. Truly wonderful.



(could one of you bears please give some more reason why it should not be going up   bwahhahahahahahahahahahah)



buy strength sell weakness







bric

energy

tech

infra

ag



get long



(BTW   dont care about jobs number-does not matter crap number BUY OPENING)





Nov 5, 2009 5:49 pm

1

Nov 5, 2009 6:01 pm

fr

Nov 5, 2009 6:05 pm
If anyone is watching CNBC...look at Michelle Caruso Cabrerras nipples...they look just like mlgone's moms
Nov 5, 2009 6:10 pm

just because i have been wrong 100% of the time doesn’t mean you are right.  i am meletio, who has gotten everything wrong this week.

Nov 5, 2009 6:17 pm

yes.  Greece.  home of boy lovers!  Eat it, pikers!  The market will crash in precisely 2 hours, 31 minutes and 27 seconds!  Raining ACATS chumps!

Nov 5, 2009 6:30 pm

totally don’t get michelle carusa cabrera.



scag

Nov 5, 2009 6:36 pm

f

Nov 5, 2009 6:37 pm

i’m trying to fit in guys. you know, pretend i like girls too.

Nov 6, 2009 9:45 pm

SHARE PRICES ARE HIGHER ONCE

AGAIN, and we are obviously dead, utterly,

completely wrong in our decision made early in

October to be short of the US market in any way,

shape or form. Our Int’l Index remains well below its

most recent multi-year high made in mid-October just

under 7,700, and the upward sloping trend lines that

had supported the NASDAQ, the S&P, the Dow, the

Russell et al remain broken to the downside, but for

whatever reason, shares have gone higher and we are

wrong to be short.

All of the things we have come to rely upon over thirty

+ years of watching the stock market here in the US

are proving to be worthless. Volume is rising as stocks

fall, while volume wanes as prices rise, but that seems

not to matter, for stocks keep rising. The P/e multiples

are high, but that does not matter; they rise further and

shares move higher. Insider selling swamps insider

buying by margins we’ve not seen before, but that

matters not a whit; share prices continue to advance.

The Dow Transports have not confirmed the strength in

the Dow Industrials, but so what? Shares keep going

higher. Earnings that are good are met with massive

share weakness; while “misses” to the downside are

met by rapid price increases. Thus, either we’ve gone

mad, or the market has, but we wash our hands of it

and leave it to others wiser, or more courageous, or

sillier than we to make sense of it all:

New bull??
Nov 6, 2009 10:34 pm

[quote=howboutshoeshine]

SHARE PRICES ARE HIGHER ONCE



AGAIN,

and we are obviously dead, utterly,



completely wrong in our decision made early in



October to be short of the US market in any way,



shape or form. Our Int’l Index remains well below its



most recent multi-year high made in mid-October just



under 7,700, and the upward sloping trend lines that



had supported the NASDAQ, the S&P, the Dow, the



Russell et al remain broken to the downside, but for



whatever reason, shares have gone higher and we are



wrong to be short.



All of the things we have come to rely upon over thirty



+ years of watching the stock market here in the US



are proving to be worthless. Volume is rising as stocks



fall, while volume wanes as prices rise, but that seems



not to matter, for stocks keep rising. The P/e multiples



are high, but that does not matter; they rise further and



shares move higher. Insider selling swamps insider



buying by margins we’ve not seen before, but that



matters not a whit; share prices continue to advance.



The Dow Transports have not confirmed the strength in



the Dow Industrials, but so what? Shares keep going



higher. Earnings that are good are met with massive



share weakness; while “misses” to the downside are



met by rapid price increases. Thus, either we’ve gone



mad, or the market has, but we wash our hands of it



and leave it to others wiser, or more courageous, or



sillier than we to make sense of it all:





New bull?? [/quote]



translation for above:   I was wrong.



amzn making new highs.     nice

ewz up 100% last 12 months     wonderful



loser bears talking their books…priceless.





short it. go for it.   
Nov 6, 2009 10:58 pm

Ira- 100% SHORT with use of ETF’s

personal account- 30 put contracts for November 102's at .46 cents   I just wanted to see if that changed anyone's convictions. I ALWAYS put my money where my mouth is brutha.
Nov 6, 2009 11:07 pm

sweet   

i hope they are trip shorts.



ull be covering in pain



AAII: 33% bulls. always wrong



All bears are welcome to tell us why market should not be going up.



I love that so much.



I heard one tool on CNBC actually say that the market

had “no right” to go up.   funny    



(PS jobs data good for stocks. the longer Ben keeps all you loser bears cash at 1/2 of 1%, the more it finds its way to risk)



lets review again:



1. BRIC   (write on ur hand)



2. market is a discounting mechanism



If u get bearish, repeat 1 and 2 above

Nov 7, 2009 2:25 am

[quote=howboutshoeshine]Ira- 100% SHORT with use of ETF’s

personal account- 30 put contracts for November 102's at .46 cents   I just wanted to see if that changed anyone's convictions. I ALWAYS put my money where my mouth is brutha.[/quote] Hey brutha, ya sure there is room in there for your coinage with your b/d's ding dong in there first? 
Nov 7, 2009 4:56 pm

[quote=Bud Fox][quote=howboutshoeshine]Ira- 100% SHORT with use of ETF’s

personal account- 30 put contracts for November 102's at .46 cents   I just wanted to see if that changed anyone's convictions. I ALWAYS put my money where my mouth is brutha.[/quote] Hey brutha, ya sure there is room in there for your coinage with your b/d's ding dong in there first?  [/quote]   Another CHILD. Hello there. You are quite the loser as well. Did you know that it was Friday? NO need for your pathetic replies. LOSER. I try to add to this forum and get little babies responding with childish remarks. Hey ADMIN, where ya at?
Nov 7, 2009 7:21 pm

I saw the title and thought someone started a thread to say they hated

<--------------------- BerkshireBULL





Nov 9, 2009 3:30 pm
BerkshireBull:

I saw the title and thought someone started a thread to say they hated

<--------------------- BerkshireBULL





  no muffin head   we love you.   today NOT a good day for the bears.     We might get a monster blow off day to upside here (500 plus). (oct 08 gap)   keep holding that cash u bears.   can someone please give me another reason why it should not be going up?   bric ag infra commods tech          
Nov 9, 2009 3:44 pm
Shania Twain:

[quote=BerkshireBull] I saw the title and thought someone started a thread to say they hated

<--------------------- BerkshireBULL





  no muffin head   we love you.   today NOT a good day for the bears.     We might get a monster blow off day to upside here (500 plus). (oct 08 gap)   keep holding that cash u bears.   can someone please give me another reason why it should not be going up?   bric ag infra commods tech          [/quote]   No, but I will give you a million reasons why it's ready to CRASH. AMZN good one. If you held it since 99' your up 10%. What is that in annual terms? Shania, No one is arguing day to day action here. The market is increasing with everything going against it. That's NOT a good thing. Reminds me of the TECH bubble and the ridiculous housing market. Truth is......I hope you're right and I'm wrong because I will have and easier life your way, but under NO circumstance do I see it as a possibility.
Nov 9, 2009 3:57 pm

[

   [/quote]   No, but I will give you a million reasons why it's ready to CRASH. AMZN good one. If you held it since 99' your up 10%. What is that in annual terms? Shania, No one is arguing day to day action here. The market is increasing with everything going against it. That's NOT a good thing. Reminds me of the TECH bubble and the ridiculous housing market. Truth is......I hope you're right and I'm wrong because I will have and easier life your way, but under NO circumstance do I see it as a possibility.[/quote]     good.   keep doubting it.   keep shorting it.   keep holding your cash.   "If you held it since 99' your up 10%. What is that in annual terms?"     You're looking out back window brother.    The above comment is the MAIN REASON we will be way above mean next ten years.   Buy AFTER nasty rolling 10 years.   1250 is coming quickly   .5% cash making you bears CRAZY.    This is wonderful        
Nov 9, 2009 5:22 pm


Here’s a good reason. The rally is not based on fundamentals



Nov 9, 2009 5:31 pm
downdowndown:


Here’s a good reason. The rally is not based on fundamentals

Doesn't a negative correlation of .88 mean that it's highly predictive. Based on that chart, it would appear it is based on fundamentals of the dollar for the broader market.
Nov 9, 2009 5:35 pm
LSUAlum:

[quote=downdowndown]
Here’s a good reason. The rally is not based on fundamentals

Doesn't a negative correlation of .88 mean that it's highly predictive. Based on that chart, it would appear it is based on fundamentals of the dollar for the broader market.[/quote]

LSU - yes. 
Nov 9, 2009 5:39 pm

Sure, but if the stocks are at rather lofty multiples then wouldn’t that assume things would get better. Shouldn’t the dollar then be going up?

The entire mkt now is based on the biggest bang for the buck. It’s controlled by traders playing the dollar dow trade, but it does not really make too much sense. when stocks go up on something that doesn’t make sense…bad things happen. ( tech bubble )…maybe not today but I think soon…plus the volume is slowing as we go up

Nov 9, 2009 5:44 pm

[quote=downdowndown] Sure, but if the stocks are at rather lofty multiples then wouldn’t that assume things would get better. Shouldn’t the dollar then be going up?

The entire mkt now is based on the biggest bang for the buck. It’s controlled by traders playing the dollar dow trade, but it does not really make too much sense. when stocks go up on something that doesn’t make sense…bad things happen. ( tech bubble )…maybe not today but I think soon…plus the volume is slowing as we go up[/quote]



excellent



short it

hold cash



you should go all in short

maybe trip short





Nov 9, 2009 5:45 pm

I am !

Nov 9, 2009 5:48 pm

The dollar is weak?

Wow.    That’s some great insight there.

Maybe we should tell someone?





1100 ish. and next 120 spee points UP quick

Nov 9, 2009 5:50 pm

You asked for a reason why it should go down. I’ve given one . Why should it go up ( asset managers chasing performance is not a good reason )

Nov 9, 2009 6:02 pm

Why do you need a reason?  You nor I can predict it, so go with what the market is doing.  A falling currency can be good for the stock market.  Money searches for returns, and a low interest rates combined with a falling dollar is a losing proposition.  IMO, the market is simply a measure of risk acceptance or aversion.  Valuations, currency moves, jobs reports, government policies, and anything else you can think of is nice to talk about, but at the end of the day it is mental doodling.

Nov 9, 2009 6:05 pm
Jebediah:

Why do you need a reason?  You nor I can predict it, so go with what the market is doing.  A falling currency can be good for the stock market.  Money searches for returns, and a low interest rates combined with a falling dollar is a losing proposition.  IMO, the market is simply a measure of risk acceptance or aversion.  Valuations, currency moves, jobs reports, government policies, and anything else you can think of is nice to talk about, but at the end of the day it is mental doodling.

  If you feel this way, you must be a technition. And you see that technically we are worse off than we are fundamentally. You are short?
Nov 9, 2009 6:05 pm
Jebediah:

Why do you need a reason? You nor I can predict it, so go with what the market is doing. A falling currency can be good for the stock market. Money searches for returns, and a low interest rates combined with a falling dollar is a losing proposition. IMO, the market is simply a measure of risk acceptance or aversion. Valuations, currency moves, jobs reports, government policies, and anything else you can think of is nice to talk about, but at the end of the day it is mental doodling.





None of it matters until it does!

In late January 2000, Abby Joseph Cohen, chief U.S. market strategist at Goldman Sachs said, "Returns will be good, but not great." Ralph Acampora of Prudential Securities, another highly respected analyst, saw the main indexes rising perhaps 20% to 25%. "2000 will be, on balance, a very, very good year," he said on January 8th of that year. He went on to say, "this could last another four or five years."

     Also, in June of 2000, the USA Today polled several high-profile market "experts" for their outlook on the second half of that year. Thomas Galvin, of the former Donaldson Lufkin & Jenrette firm, predicted stocks would head "much higher". Alan Skrainka, chief market strategist at Edward Jones said, "We're pretty upbeat." Morgan Stanley's frequently publicized opinions from Mary Meeker included, "The Bull market in stocks shows no indications of slowing down."
Nov 9, 2009 6:10 pm

[quote=downdowndown] Alan Skrainka, chief market strategist at Edward Jones said, “We’re pretty upbeat.” Morgan Stanley’s frequently publicized opinions from Mary Meeker included, “The Bull market in stocks shows no indications of slowing down.”[/quote]

I wasn’t bearish until just now.  Do whatever the opposite of what Skrainka is saying.

Nov 9, 2009 6:11 pm

[quote=downdowndown]



None of it matters until it does!



In late January 2000, Abby Joseph Cohen, chief U.S. market strategist at Goldman Sachs said, “Returns will be good, but not great.” Ralph Acampora of Prudential Securities, another highly respected analyst, saw the main indexes rising perhaps 20% to 25%. “2000 will be, on balance, a very, very good year,” he said on January 8th of that year. He went on to say, “this could last another four or five years.”



     Also, in June of 2000, the USA Today polled several high-profile market “experts” for their outlook on the second half of that year. Thomas Galvin, of the former Donaldson Lufkin & Jenrette firm, predicted stocks would head “much higher”. Alan Skrainka, chief market strategist at Edward Jones said, “We’re pretty upbeat.” Morgan Stanley’s frequently publicized opinions from Mary Meeker included, “The Bull market in stocks shows no indications of slowing down.”[/quote]



great insights



I love u bears talking your book



give me more





Nov 9, 2009 6:13 pm

Morean…read again…that quote was from the year 2000. My point was that ways to measure stocks do matter. The mkt is very inefficient on the short term. It’s just gambling. Time will produce the truth. It’s not different this time

Nov 9, 2009 6:16 pm

Never mind, I must be slipping.

Nov 9, 2009 6:23 pm
howboutshoeshine:

[quote=Jebediah]Why do you need a reason?  You nor I can predict it, so go with what the market is doing.  A falling currency can be good for the stock market.  Money searches for returns, and a low interest rates combined with a falling dollar is a losing proposition.  IMO, the market is simply a measure of risk acceptance or aversion.  Valuations, currency moves, jobs reports, government policies, and anything else you can think of is nice to talk about, but at the end of the day it is mental doodling.

  If you feel this way, you must be a technition. And you see that technically we are worse off than we are fundamentally. You are short?[/quote]     About 6'2" actually.  No I am not short.  Nor am I a trader.
Nov 9, 2009 6:30 pm
Jebediah:

[quote=howboutshoeshine][quote=Jebediah]Why do you need a reason?  You nor I can predict it, so go with what the market is doing.  A falling currency can be good for the stock market.  Money searches for returns, and a low interest rates combined with a falling dollar is a losing proposition.  IMO, the market is simply a measure of risk acceptance or aversion.  Valuations, currency moves, jobs reports, government policies, and anything else you can think of is nice to talk about, but at the end of the day it is mental doodling.

  If you feel this way, you must be a technition. And you see that technically we are worse off than we are fundamentally. You are short?[/quote]     About 6'2" actually.  No I am not short.  Nor am I a trader.[/quote]   Funny. I do trade, however all of us that "manage" money should be aware of a markets health. If this market were a person it would have stage 4 cancer, HIV, H1N1, just nubs as limbs and a sniper shooting at it. It's going up, never denied that, but if you're not concerned then I have NO clue what you're looking at. Either you don't know or you're in denial, hoping for the best. As I said earlier, I hope this PIG does go up. that would sure make my life easier.
Nov 9, 2009 6:42 pm

None of it matters until it does!

    Exactly.  Here is what I equate this conversation to.  Is it going to rain on July 4, 2010?  Kind of important to know as many people make plans to be outside on this day.   Reasons it won't:   1.  Historically July 4 is rain free 79% of the time.   2.  It has rained the previous two Fourth of July's, so the odds are against three in a row.   3.  The Farmers Almanac says it won't.   Reasons it will:   1.  Global warming is leading to increased precipitation worldwide.   2.  Two rainy 4ths is a trend to be continued.   3.  72% of the time when long term weather patterns have mimicked or current patterns it has rained on July 4 the following year.     My point is this, how the hell knows?  I tell my clients that I do not, but if it is raining on their portfolio July 4, 2010, I will let them know and we will take the steps necessary to stay dry.   Full disclosure: all stated facts and opinions were made up for illustration purposes.
Nov 9, 2009 6:48 pm

What if there is an 80% chance a hurricane will strike between July 1st and July 14th?

70%?

60%?

50%?

Better to be safe than sorry?
Nov 9, 2009 7:01 pm

My point in referencing the post about the Dollar V. DOW correlation was that it was fundamental in nature. By that I mean it wasn’t based on the ‘paper’ of stocks as much as the underlying reason.

  Fundamental trading typically refers to the individual companies and their underlying business or industry. Technical analysis is price action for the market.   Now it could be argued that the technical analysis of the dollar versus the market as a whole is what is driving this. It could also be argued that the falling dollar is advantageous for most of the companies trading on the broader exchanges due to the global nature of their business. The cheaper dollar means (relative to the price they receive from goods/services overseas) the 'cost' of doing business outside of the US is lower. Thus a large portion of their business is now cheaper (much like falling commodity prices helps the supplier first, then potentially the consumer).   The end result is that the broader market moves up. Is this technical analysis (which discounts the companies altogether and relies on talking about the 'paper' that is traded in a vacuum) or is it a fundamentally good thing for US companies as they become more profitable relative to their foreign competitors outside the US?   Benefits of a falling dollar include a potential reversal of the ongoing trend to outsource labor overseas by US companies or moving manufacturing plants to Central/South America because the benefit is contingent upon the cost (labor in this instance) of doing business Domestically to be materially higher than abroad. Fewer outsourced jobs mean potential job creation domestically. Again, this is fundamental to business success, not technical analysis of the paper that is trading.   It's kind of a chicken - or - the - egg argument.
Nov 9, 2009 7:06 pm

[quote=howboutshoeshine]

What if there is an 80% chance a hurricane will strike between July 1st and July 14th?

70%?

60%?

50%?

Better to be safe than sorry?[/quote]   I dispute the % chance of something happening.  What was the % chance of the market rising 50% in the following 6 months on March 9, 2009?   The market and therefore it's price is based simply on the acceptance or aversion to risk.  The P/E ratio on the market is lower now than on 3/31/2009.  What does that say?  I'm not telling you that you are wrong, I am saying that you have no way of knowing.  
Nov 9, 2009 7:14 pm

The scariest thing of the asset bubble’ being created by the weak dollar will be that we ( our mkt and our economy will be Japan ) How would liked to have been a broker in Japan for the last 15 years. Slow painful touture



The interlocking nature of Japanese stock ownership, with financial institutions owning large chunks of other companies, had once seemed to be an ingredient of the nation’s economic success, one that contributed to the Nikkei’s 1980s rise. Increasingly, it now came to be seen as a problem, with banks’ stability tied to a volatile equity market.



As Japan moved in and out of recession throughout the 1990s, Japanese stocks put in a lackluster performance, notably contrasting with the bull market taking shape in the U.S. and various other countries. The Nikkei fell below 13,000 in 1998 before rallying to almost 19,000 at end-1999. These gains mostly slipped away in 2000, however, and as equities fell worldwide following the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks, the Nikkei went lower than 10,000 for the first time since 1984.



On November 14, 2002, the Nikkei sank below the Dow Jones Industrial Average, closing at 8,303 compared to the Dow’s 8,542. This crossing of paths would not last long, but prior to Japan’s lost decade, it would have been difficult to imagine such a thing happening at all. On the last trading day of the 1980s, when the Dow closed at 2,753, the American benchmark had been about one-fourteenth of the high-flying Nikkei.



The rebound that began in 2003 brought the Nikkei from a low of 7,607 on April 30 of that year to 18,261 on July 9, 2007. But a steady descent brought the index into the 13,000 range by mid-2008 and the decline became precipitous as equities around the world deflated last September. With the Nikkei lately still mired in four digits, Japan’s economic debacle is ongoing, and the lost decade now threatens to stretch into a pair of lost decades.

Nov 9, 2009 7:20 pm

[quote=Jebediah][quote=howboutshoeshine]

What if there is an 80% chance a hurricane will strike between July 1st and July 14th?

70%?

60%?

50%?

Better to be safe than sorry?[/quote]   I dispute the % chance of something happening.  What was the % chance of the market rising 50% in the following 6 months on March 9, 2009?   The market and therefore it's price is based simply on the acceptance or aversion to risk.  The P/E ratio on the market is lower now than on 3/31/2009.  What does that say?  I'm not telling you that you are wrong, I am saying that you have no way of knowing.   [/quote]   For me, and many others that follow trends the probability was VERY high.  3% bullish, biggest CRASH in history, risk aversion at the highest levels in history. ( I use treasuries to measure willingness to take risk because it is the "safest" asset class ) We are in the opposite position now. ( same as 2007 ) I here ya though, prediction is always based on probability and because of that I may be COMPLETELY wrong. You have a strong point, just the same.
Nov 9, 2009 7:24 pm

There is also a ton of companies that buy goods from overseas. I sure can’t see advantage as an individual have my currency decline in value on a daily bases. consumer 2/3 of gdp. On a side note about our problems …the banks are now treating forclosures as if they were OPEC. they open up and let a few out each month as they are still holding a ton of them on the books.   which after all was the root of the problem in the first place

Nov 9, 2009 7:27 pm

YOU GUYS DO KNOW THAT DOWNDOWNDOWN IS THE GUY PRETENDING TO BE THE REAL MELETIO, DON’T YOU?

LET IT RAIN!!!  WATCH THE MARKET FALL.  DOLLAR IS WEAK.  WE’RE GOING TO END UP JUST LIKE JAPAN.

Nov 9, 2009 7:32 pm

[quote=meletoi] YOU GUYS DO KNOW THAT DOWNDOWNDOWN IS THE GUY PRETENDING TO BE THE REAL MELETIO, DON’T YOU?LET IT RAIN!!! WATCH THE MARKET FALL. DOLLAR IS WEAK. WE’RE GOING TO END UP JUST LIKE JAPAN.

[/quote]





?

Nov 9, 2009 7:33 pm

TAKE A LOOK AT THE GRAPHS THE FAKE MELETIO POSTED.  SAME SOURCE.

Nov 9, 2009 7:35 pm

Who are you ?

Nov 9, 2009 7:53 pm
downtowns:

There is also a ton of companies that buy goods from overseas. I sure can’t see advantage as an individual have my currency decline in value on a daily bases. consumer 2/3 of gdp. On a side note about our problems …the banks are now treating foreclosures as if they were OPEC. they open up and let a few out each month as they are still holding a ton of them on the books.   which after all was the root of the problem in the first place

First off, you have no idea what you are talking about with Banks and Foreclosures. Banks have no desire to keep a non-performing assets on their books any longer than they have to. The reason being is that it directly affects their capital structure to have non-performing assets and that structure is what allows banks to lever their money by creating loans. The entire non-performing asset problem is what lead to the 'zombie bank' phenomenon. They have capitalization requirements to remain solvent.   Secondly, you can't see an advantage to the lower dollar? Lets see, rising interest rates means that as a highly leveraged consumer you will be squeezed (bad) but as an investor or dealing in an industry that is involved with investing (see title of website you are on) higher rates mean better returns for investors (new issues of bonds will be at a higher rate, money market accounts and CD's won't be a joke for investors anymore). Higher rates typically coincide with higher inflation. Inflation is NOT A BAD thing in moderation. Inflation is what keeps the economy from dying. Demand spurs corporate profits and also revenues, which in turn spurs earnings and thus higher stock prices.   The reason Inflation is not a bad thing in moderation is it spurs demand. Example: If you were going to buy a house, but knew that the price would drop 5% by year end, you do not buy it. No one purposefully buys an asset to have it decline. If you knew that it was going to go up 5% soon, you would rush to buy it today. No one wants to pay more than they have to for an asset either. Without inflation (in moderation) you have low or no demand for goods.   The housing bubble is an example of how inflation spurred demand. It is also an example of how it was no longer in moderation and thus caused a problem. The result of deflation on homes has also been a great example of how deflation cripples demand and how it should be avoided at all costs.
Nov 9, 2009 7:57 pm

Get your fact correct before you tell someone they have no idea what they’re are talking about.





Banks aren’t reselling many foreclosed homes



Carolyn Said, Chronicle Staff Writer



          



A vast “shadow inventory” of foreclosed homes that banks are holding off the market could wreak havoc with the already battered real estate sector, industry observers say.



Lenders nationwide are sitting on hundreds of thousands of foreclosed homes that they have not resold or listed for sale, according to numerous data sources. And foreclosures, which banks unload at fire-sale prices, are a major factor driving home values down.



“We believe there are in the neighborhood of 600,000 properties nationwide that banks have repossessed but not put on the market,” said Rick Sharga, vice president of RealtyTrac, which compiles nationwide statistics on foreclosures. “California probably represents 80,000 of those homes. It could be disastrous if the banks suddenly flooded the market with those distressed properties. You’d have further depreciation and carnage.”



Nov 9, 2009 8:01 pm

Inflation did not spur the demand for homes, easy money did.

Nov 9, 2009 8:03 pm
downdowndown:

Get your fact correct before you tell someone they have no idea what they’re are talking about.


Banks aren’t reselling many foreclosed homes

Carolyn Said, Chronicle Staff Writer

          

A vast “shadow inventory” of foreclosed homes that banks are holding off the market could wreak havoc with the already battered real estate sector, industry observers say.

Lenders nationwide are sitting on hundreds of thousands of foreclosed homes that they have not resold or listed for sale, according to numerous data sources. And foreclosures, which banks unload at fire-sale prices, are a major factor driving home values down.

“We believe there are in the neighborhood of 600,000 properties nationwide that banks have repossessed but not put on the market,” said Rick Sharga, vice president of RealtyTrac, which compiles nationwide statistics on foreclosures. “California probably represents 80,000 of those homes. It could be disastrous if the banks suddenly flooded the market with those distressed properties. You’d have further depreciation and carnage.”

I worked at a bank for going on a decade, so take it from me, I do have my facts straight.   Because some reporter quotes some stats does not A) make it a fact or B) show the context of the numbers.   The fact remains that NO BANK wants to own non-performing asset. Try looking up sometime what the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 sometime for some of the requirements that Banks have for solvency before you post some reporter to support your argument.   Do banks own non-performing assets? Sure. Are they actively seeking the best possible way to get rid of them? Absolutely. Are they doing some OPEC type rationing? Absolutely NOT.   Again, you sir, have no idea how much you don't know about this subject.
Nov 9, 2009 8:04 pm

[quote=downdowndown]Get your fact correct before you tell someone they have no idea what they’re are talking about.





Banks aren’t reselling many foreclosed homes



Carolyn Said, Chronicle Staff Writer



          



A vast “shadow inventory” of foreclosed homes that banks are holding off the market could wreak havoc with the already battered real estate sector, industry observers say.



Lenders nationwide are sitting on hundreds of thousands of foreclosed homes that they have not resold or listed for sale, according to numerous data sources. And foreclosures, which banks unload at fire-sale prices, are a major factor driving home values down.



“We believe there are in the neighborhood of 600,000 properties nationwide that banks have repossessed but not put on the market,” said Rick Sharga, vice president of RealtyTrac, which compiles nationwide statistics on foreclosures. “California probably represents 80,000 of those homes. It could be disastrous if the banks suddenly flooded the market with those distressed properties. You’d have further depreciation and carnage.”



[/quote]

WHAT DID I TELL YOU?

LET IT RAIN!!!

Nov 9, 2009 8:05 pm

wrong again.

Banks Purposely Holding Off the Market a Vast Inventory of Foreclosed Homes



By editor|Apr 8, 2009, 12:56 PM|Author’s Website



Lenders nationwide are sitting on hundreds of thousands of foreclosed homes that they have not resold or listed for sale, according to numerous data source.



“We believe there are in the neighborhood of 600,000 properties nationwide that banks have repossessed but not put on the market,” said Rick Sharga, vice president of RealtyTrac, which compiles nationwide statistics on foreclosures.



“There is a real danger that there is much more (foreclosure) inventory than we are measuring,” said Celia Chen, director of housing economics at Moody’s Economy.com.



In the Bay Area, a Chronicle analysis of data from San Diego’s MDA DataQuick shows that more than one-third of foreclosures are in shadow territory - that is, they are not registering in county records as having been resold.



For the 26 months from January 2007 through February 2009, banks repossessed 51,602 homes and condos in the nine-county Bay Area, according to DataQuick. Yet in the same period, only 30,823 foreclosures were resold, leaving about 20,000 bank repos unaccounted for. [via San Francisco Chronicle]



This article seems to suggest that the very banks that issued the toxic loans are now purposely creating a housing shortage in order to artificially depress foreclosure numbers and in the process drive up the value of their inventory. According to vice president of RealtyTrac, in a normal market, there are 160,000 (foreclosures for sale nationwide) over the course of a year. Right now, there are about 80,000 every month.” That should give you a sense on the severity of the situation.

Nov 9, 2009 8:07 pm
LSUAlum:

[quote=downdowndown]Get your fact correct before you tell someone they have no idea what they’re are talking about.


Banks aren’t reselling many foreclosed homes

Carolyn Said, Chronicle Staff Writer

          

A vast “shadow inventory” of foreclosed homes that banks are holding off the market could wreak havoc with the already battered real estate sector, industry observers say.

Lenders nationwide are sitting on hundreds of thousands of foreclosed homes that they have not resold or listed for sale, according to numerous data sources. And foreclosures, which banks unload at fire-sale prices, are a major factor driving home values down.

“We believe there are in the neighborhood of 600,000 properties nationwide that banks have repossessed but not put on the market,” said Rick Sharga, vice president of RealtyTrac, which compiles nationwide statistics on foreclosures. “California probably represents 80,000 of those homes. It could be disastrous if the banks suddenly flooded the market with those distressed properties. You’d have further depreciation and carnage.”

I worked at a bank for going on a decade, so take it from me, I do have my facts straight.   Because some reporter quotes some stats does not A) make it a fact or B) show the context of the numbers.   The fact remains that NO BANK wants to own non-performing asset. Try looking up sometime what the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 sometime for some of the requirements that Banks have for solvency before you post some reporter to support your argument.   Do banks own non-performing assets? Sure. Are they actively seeking the best possible way to get rid of them? Absolutely. Are they doing some OPEC type rationing? Absolutely NOT.   Again, you sir, have no idea how much you don't know about this subject.[/quote]   You are wrong. DEFLATION is the biggest world concern right now. In ordinary times you would be correct. If the market is flooded right now, the banks would sink themselves. It is in their OWN best interest that these homes are not hitting the market. NEVER a good idea to say "you have no idea" That shows ignorance, too presumptive.
Nov 9, 2009 8:09 pm

SEE, THIS IS THE SAME PUNK WHO THINKS HE KNOWS EVERYTHING.  LOOKS LIKE AN OPINION PIECE TO ME.

LOOKS LIKE THE INFO IS FROM THE SAN FRANCISCO CHRONICLE.  THE BRAIN TRUST IS AWESOME THERE.

LET IT RAIN!!!

Nov 9, 2009 8:09 pm

thank you

Nov 9, 2009 8:13 pm
downdowndown:

Inflation did not spur the demand for homes, easy money did.

Ok, using your flawed logic.   Home  A is priced at $500k. I can get an interest only loan that has interest only payments for 10 years and is a 30 year ammortized loan for the principle. Home is likely going to be worth $600k next year (20% appreciation was not uncommon in NV, FL, AZ, or CA). Do I do this deal? Of course.   Home B is priced at $500k.  I can get an interest only loan that has interest only payments for 10 years and is a 30 year ammortized loan for the principle. Home is likely going to be worth $400k next year. Do I do this deal? HELL NO.   What was the driving factor? The appreciation of the home.   The Community Reinvestment Act of 1994 did go a long way in contributing to some of the 'easy money' people talk about. Question though, why is it the home bubble didnt' start in 1995 then? It was the inflation of the home prices that fed upon itself that caused the bubble.   Also, the money became easier to lend based on the appreciation of home values.   Little Underwriting tip for you. When you U/W a mortgage you are U/W the risk of two things. The borrower and the collateral. In a normal business cycle of moderate price appreciation the collateral has to have some 'cushion' because Foreclosed properties are sold at a steep discount because banks do not want to own non-performing assets (see above discussion). So either the consumer pays a higher rate and/or has MI or a subordiate lien OR they put money down.  This is standard practice along with accounting for consumer credit worthiness.   However, when a home price is appreciating at 20%+ the 'RISK' associated with the collateral is materially lower thus the consumer creditworthiness is much less of a factor.   If the loan decision is something like "A + B >= Risk" in order to loan (where A is the Collateral and B is the Consumer Creditworthiness) then you can see where A grows B can decline and still be above the risk profile needed to lend money.   It was the price appreciation that caused the bubble NOT the easy lending. The easy lending did contribute but was secondary to the price increases.
Nov 9, 2009 8:16 pm
howboutshoeshine:

[quote=LSUAlum][quote=downdowndown]Get your fact correct before you tell someone they have no idea what they’re are talking about.


Banks aren’t reselling many foreclosed homes

Carolyn Said, Chronicle Staff Writer

          

A vast “shadow inventory” of foreclosed homes that banks are holding off the market could wreak havoc with the already battered real estate sector, industry observers say.

Lenders nationwide are sitting on hundreds of thousands of foreclosed homes that they have not resold or listed for sale, according to numerous data sources. And foreclosures, which banks unload at fire-sale prices, are a major factor driving home values down.

“We believe there are in the neighborhood of 600,000 properties nationwide that banks have repossessed but not put on the market,” said Rick Sharga, vice president of RealtyTrac, which compiles nationwide statistics on foreclosures. “California probably represents 80,000 of those homes. It could be disastrous if the banks suddenly flooded the market with those distressed properties. You’d have further depreciation and carnage.”

I worked at a bank for going on a decade, so take it from me, I do have my facts straight.   Because some reporter quotes some stats does not A) make it a fact or B) show the context of the numbers.   The fact remains that NO BANK wants to own non-performing asset. Try looking up sometime what the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 sometime for some of the requirements that Banks have for solvency before you post some reporter to support your argument.   Do banks own non-performing assets? Sure. Are they actively seeking the best possible way to get rid of them? Absolutely. Are they doing some OPEC type rationing? Absolutely NOT.   Again, you sir, have no idea how much you don't know about this subject.[/quote]   You are wrong. DEFLATION is the biggest world concern right now. In ordinary times you would be correct. If the market is flooded right now, the banks would sink themselves. It is in their OWN best interest that these homes are not hitting the market. NEVER a good idea to say "you have no idea" That shows ignorance, too presumptive.[/quote] Not presumptive to say they have no idea when their previous posts indicate they have no idea.   Deflation isn't the biggest concern worldwide right now. Deflation was a concern earlier in the recession. Now that prices have stabilized the biggest concern is spurring demand. That is why the government has an easy money policy, liquidity regarding credit is a major concern and why there is a stimulus bill. All to increase demand.
Nov 9, 2009 8:22 pm

The price appreciation was caused by liar loans and people flipping houses the day they bought them. With the mass marketing of interest only loans people who could never remotely afford a home were blind to the price and were standing in line to compete to buy homes. I live in Florida I know for a fact. I saw it happen. With out the easy money home prices would have gone up the usual 3-6 % per years as they always have.

As far as your underwriting “lesson” that was brushed to the side during the crazyness. Big banks were buying everything they could and all involved ( agents, mortgage brokers, lenders, appraisers )were blinded by greed.

Nov 9, 2009 8:26 pm

Deflation is the major concern, by no stretch of the imagination have we beat deflation yet. That is why all policies are in place right now. Housing for example…We were flooded with supply that now sits off the market in bank books. We have small increase in demand due to cheap money however, place those homes on the the market and POW BOOM BLAT!! Prices will fall like a ton of bricks. that is deflation. Why is a STRONG dollar govt. allowing US dollar to fall? Keeps the cheap money trade alive. US follows their “supposed” policy BOW BOOM CRACK!!! Prices fall like a ton of bricks!! Again deflation. Govt. spending…Cash for clunkers, home buyers credit etc. all examples of combating deflation, or creating a false demand by making products cheaper for the consumer( deflation ) with the use of YOUR tax dollars. Either way, the fight is still against DEFLATION

Nov 9, 2009 8:54 pm
downdowndown:

The price appreciation was caused by liar loans and people flipping houses the day they bought them. With the mass marketing of interest only loans people who could never remotely afford a home were blind to the price and were standing in line to compete to buy homes. I live in Florida I know for a fact. I saw it happen. With out the easy money home prices would have gone up the usual 3-6 % per years as they always have.
As far as your underwriting “lesson” that was brushed to the side during the crazyness. Big banks were buying everything they could and all involved ( agents, mortgage brokers, lenders, appraisers )were blinded by greed.

I don't think you undestand what the word 'caused' means.   The reason I showed you a underwriting "lesson" was to illustrate that the homes had to appreciate in value in order for the 'liar loans' to work for a lender, the collateral portion of the equation has to take on a disporportionate amount of risk mitigation. That doesn't happen UNTIL prices start soaring.   As a matter of fact, 'liar loans' or Stated Income Stated Asset loans have been around since the mid 1980's. NIV and NINA loans have been around since shortly there after. The loan programs were not CREATED during the boom.   Money absolutely became easier to come by during the boom. But the price inflation caused that, not the other way around.   BTW living in Florida does not mean you 'know for a fact'. I live in TEXAS but I don't know for a fact how to raise cattle. I even know people who own Oil and Gas LLP's but I don't know for a fact how to drill for oil. Work for a lender or deal with non-performing assets for a company that makes it's hay doing that and then you will 'KNOW FOR A FACT'.
Nov 9, 2009 8:56 pm

now you’re just being a d*** b/c I disagree. I’m done with you . See yah

Nov 9, 2009 8:59 pm
howboutshoeshine:

Deflation is the major concern, by no stretch of the imagination have we beat deflation yet. That is why all policies are in place right now. Housing for example…We were flooded with supply that now sits off the market in bank books. We have small increase in demand due to cheap money however, place those homes on the the market and POW BOOM BLAT!! Prices will fall like a ton of bricks. that is deflation. Why is a STRONG dollar govt. allowing US dollar to fall? Keeps the cheap money trade alive. US follows their “supposed” policy BOW BOOM CRACK!!! Prices fall like a ton of bricks!! Again deflation. Govt. spending…Cash for clunkers, home buyers credit etc. all examples of combating deflation, or creating a false demand by making products cheaper for the consumer( deflation ) with the use of YOUR tax dollars. Either way, the fight is still against DEFLATION

The fight isn't against deflation. No one thinks cars will be cheaper tomorrow than today. No one thinks toothpaste will be cheaper tomorrow than today. The fight is against unemployment and liquidity in the credit markets.   They are trying to spur on demand, but demand isn't lagging because of fears of deflation. It's lagging because of a lack of capital in the system. The government is creating a cheap money scenario to make it beneficial to lend and thus increase demand.   The housing market has stabilized and hit bottom roughly June/July based on the national association of realtors. Prices have risen (modestly to be sure) but steadily since then. There is no DEFLATION worry now, it's a worry about demand due to unemployment and credit.
Nov 9, 2009 9:19 pm

OK LSUALUM,

  Let's look at this another way..... I eliminate all the DEMAND being created. What happens to price? So what are we fighting?
Nov 9, 2009 10:28 pm
LSUAlum:

[quote=howboutshoeshine]Deflation is the major concern, by no stretch of the imagination have we beat deflation yet. That is why all policies are in place right now. Housing for example…We were flooded with supply that now sits off the market in bank books. We have small increase in demand due to cheap money however, place those homes on the the market and POW BOOM BLAT!! Prices will fall like a ton of bricks. that is deflation. Why is a STRONG dollar govt. allowing US dollar to fall? Keeps the cheap money trade alive. US follows their “supposed” policy BOW BOOM CRACK!!! Prices fall like a ton of bricks!! Again deflation. Govt. spending…Cash for clunkers, home buyers credit etc. all examples of combating deflation, or creating a false demand by making products cheaper for the consumer( deflation ) with the use of YOUR tax dollars. Either way, the fight is still against DEFLATION



The fight isn’t against deflation. No one thinks cars will be cheaper tomorrow than today. No one thinks toothpaste will be cheaper tomorrow than today. The fight is against unemployment and liquidity in the credit markets.



They are trying to spur on demand, but demand isn’t lagging because of fears of deflation. It’s lagging because of a lack of capital in the system. The government is creating a cheap money scenario to make it beneficial to lend and thus increase demand.



The housing market has stabilized and hit bottom roughly June/July based on the national association of realtors. Prices have risen (modestly to be sure) but steadily since then. There is no DEFLATION worry now, it’s a worry about demand due to unemployment and credit.[/quote]



things are really really bad

inflation

deflation



maybe a combination of inflation and deflation!





short it

hold cash

get OUT!!!



(1250 on spx by dec 31)



(i really hate nick saben. thought ud beat em)
Nov 9, 2009 10:30 pm

To: Shania Twain, Iceco1d, LSUalum, Jebediah, and Morea: the discussion on the mkt allowed you all to use your brains and it was an ok forum. Guess what it’s me MELETIO. I though you losers were not debating with me anymore. Suckers !!!

Nov 9, 2009 10:32 pm
downdowndown:

To: Shania Twain, Iceco1d, LSUalum, Jebediah, and Morea: the discussion on the mkt allowed you all to use your brains and it was an ok forum. Guess what it’s me MELETIO. I though you losers were not debating with me anymore. Suckers !!!

    It appears Melito not only has UNLIMITED resources but also UNLIMITED screennames and an UNLIMITED amount of time on his hands...
Nov 9, 2009 10:38 pm
downdowndown:

To: Shania Twain, Iceco1d, LSUalum, Jebediah, and Morea: the discussion on the mkt allowed you all to use your brains and it was an ok forum. Guess what it’s me MELETIO. I though you losers were not debating with me anymore. Suckers !!!



duh

It got boring calling u on your costume changes.


Nov 10, 2009 12:31 am

TOLD YOU GUYS. IT’S OK, PRETEND MELETIO. I TEXTED EVERYBODY, THEY DECIDED TO KEEP FCUKING WITH YOU.



LET IT RAIN!!!

Nov 10, 2009 1:42 am

a week ago.    I love it.

so much cash.   so many missing it.

4% pullback bears start telling us they told you so.

This is really wonderful.

"lurking doubts launch sell off"



bwahahhahaahhahahahahahahahhahahahahah

for six mf days hahahahahahahahahaha



look at the GD picture. a week and new HIGHS   how funny



bric





Lurking doubts launch a sell-off

Weak consumer data deflate stock market by more than 2 percent



After closing above 10,000 this month for the first time in a year, the Dow tumbled 249.85 points Friday. (Richard Drew/associated Press)







By Renae Merle

Washington Post Staff Writer

Saturday, October 31, 2009



Wall Street recorded its sharpest drop in six months Friday as investors, who have been groping for evidence that an economic recovery is gaining steam, responded to renewed signs of weakness calling into question how vigorous the rebound might be.



The stock market was off more than 2 percent after the government reported a significant drop in consumer spending, which has traditionally been the engine of American economic growth. Investors have been looking for consumers to help propel the economy forward once several government programs that have jump-started the economy expire.



Those initiatives, including the popular “Cash for Clunkers” program, were behind the surprisingly strong quarter of growth this summer. After the government reported Thursday that gross domestic product was up 3.5 percent, the stock market soared even as some skeptics warned that it might be difficult to sustain strong economic activity.



Just a day later, the big gains were wiped away after a new batch of data underscored those lingering concerns, showing that consumer spending fell 0.5 percent in September. Although some kinds of consumer spending showed new signs of life, overall it was the biggest decline in nine months. The spending accounts for more than two-thirds of economy and has not shown convincing evidence of a comeback as unemployment rises.



Overlaid on those worries about the broader economy are gnawing doubts regarding the tremendous run up in stocks over recent months. The market has jumped more than 50 percent since reaching a low point in March, but now investors are questioning whether stocks have raced too far ahead.



Fear has crept back into the market. The Chicago Board Options Exchange’s Volatility Index, which measures how much investors expect stocks to swing, soared 24 percent Friday to its highest level since July.



Stocks were down in all major sectors Friday, including all 30 companies in the blue-chip Dow Jones industrial average, which suffered its largest point drop since April. The Dow reached a milestone earlier this month when it closed above 10,000 for the first in more than a year. But it fell 2.51 percent or 249.85 points Friday to close at 9712.73, nearly where it started the month.



The Standard & Poor’s 500-stock index fell nearly 3 percent Friday, leaving it down on monthly basis for the first time since February. The S&P was off 29.93 points to close at 1036.18, while the tech-heavy Nasdaq composite index slid 2.50 percent or 52.44 points to 2045.11. The Nasdaq was down 3.6 percent this month.



The sell off on Wall Street weighed on European markets, which lost steam Friday afternoon. London’s FTSE fell nearly 2 percent, while the Dax in Germany tumbled more than 3 percent.





“A lot of professional traders have made their bonuses already. Why would they want to take on additional risk at this time especially when they have serious questions about the fundamentals of the economy,” said Matt McCormick, portfolio manager and banking analyst at Bahl & Gaynor Investment Counsel, an investment management firm.



After rallying for months on expectations that the economy would improve, investors are now taking a critical look at the evidence. Of particular concern is what will drive the economy next year as economic stimulus measures wind down, analysts said.



“Investors are trying to look past that, the stimulus, to see what is it we’re ultimately going to be left with after the government isn’t there to prod spending through,” said Jack Ablin, chief investment officer at Harris Private Bank in Chicago.



Instead of continuing to drop, stocks might level off, Ablin said, and then "tread water while we wait for incremental improvement in the economy and [corporate] profits. Investors are looking for organic growth in the economy."



While analysts had expected spending on autos to slow once the Cash for Clunkers program concluded, the slump in this sector still highlighted how anemic the consumer economy remains.



“The government handed the ball off to the consumer and the consumer fell on it,” said Robert G. Smith, chairman of Smith Affiliated Capital in New York. "This is a function of there being no jobs and wages going lower."



The sell-off on the stock market also reflected a report released Friday showing a decline in consumer sentiment this month, analysts said. The Reuters/University of Michigan consumer sentiment index fell to 70.6 in October, compared with 73.5 in September.



Some of the decline in stock prices could also reflect short-term profit taking after Thursday’s gains, analysts said.



Many high-quality stocks are still cheap, according to Sacha Millstone, senior vice president of investments at Millstone Evans Group of Raymond James & Associates.



“Before, the market started to rally because there were signs of an economic recovery. We realized it wasn’t going to be Armageddon after all, but people questioned whether the recovery” would materialize, she said. "Now we are in an economic recovery and we’re questioning whether it is really going to be a strong recovery, what is it going to look like?"







After closing above 10,000 this month for the first time in a year, the Dow tumbled 249.85 points Friday. (Richard Drew/associated Press)



Nov 10, 2009 1:46 am

“Many high-quality stocks are still cheap”, according to Sacha Millstone, senior vice president of investments at Millstone Evans Group of Raymond James & Associates.


 
Nov 10, 2009 1:49 am

fritz? my man



have you come from the dark side?



Nov 10, 2009 2:47 am

[quote=howboutshoeshine]OK LSUALUM,

  Let's look at this another way..... I eliminate all the DEMAND being created. What happens to price? So what are we fighting?[/quote] Do you think that less demand equals deflation? We haven't had a deflationary period in the US for over 50 years but we have had many recessions. We have had many periods of lessening demand.   We don't have a period where you eliminate all Demand. That would be economic meltdown.
Nov 10, 2009 3:21 pm

Anybody curious as to what time the market is going to tank today?


Nov 10, 2009 3:40 pm
Moraen:

Anybody curious as to what time the market is going to tank today?


I actually do expect a pullback today but we'll see. I'm not predicting it of course but it's what I anticipate happening.
Nov 10, 2009 3:54 pm
LSUAlum:

[quote=Moraen]Anybody curious as to what time the market is going to tank today?


I actually do expect a pullback today but we'll see. I'm not predicting it of course but it's what I anticipate happening.[/quote]

Really?  What indicators are you using?  I'm genuinely curious, not trying to bash or anything. 

I was actually thinking we wouldn't see much of a pullback until after Veterans day.  But that might be my bias talking.
Nov 10, 2009 5:56 pm

My crystal ball says reduce equities to the lower end of your clients asset allocation models.

Nov 10, 2009 6:17 pm
Incredible Hulk:

My crystal ball says reduce equities to the lower end of your clients asset allocation models.




wow.    Thats a surprise.

mar 9, 2009 to mar 9, 2019

16% annualized return in s and p 500.
Nov 10, 2009 6:26 pm

I called s&p500 to 1000 by year end at the end of February. I was actively moving overweight equities. In the last month we have begun to take our profits both for protection of clients portfolios and to give them a chance to feel good about making some money and cashing it in. It may not be bold, I believe it is the right course of action.

Nov 10, 2009 6:32 pm
Incredible Hulk:

I called s&p500 to 1000 by year end at the end of February. I was actively moving overweight equities. In the last month we have begun to take our profits both for protection of clients portfolios and to give them a chance to feel good about making some money and cashing it in. It may not be bold, I believe it is the right course of action.



great call.

So did I, people laughed.

new SPX high within 18 months
Nov 10, 2009 6:41 pm

I hope you’re right, we’ll pull profits again.

Nov 11, 2009 2:39 pm

close above 1100…1250 quick

keep shorting it keep holding that cash    
Nov 11, 2009 3:35 pm

Hey Shania, what was the call for the end of November by our friend? 950? 940?

Nov 11, 2009 3:40 pm

940

And his calls on SH I am sure are blasting into the stratosphere.

Nov 11, 2009 3:50 pm

[quote=Wet_Blanket]

940





And his calls on SH I am sure are blasting into the stratosphere.

[/quote]





Meletio told me that during the last week 4 % decline he wrote covered calls against SH. down 2.8% now. not a big deal as he also bought DD at 33.20 and sold at 34.3. So net net he’s even. The s& P level is 950 by the end of Nov. He told me to tell you guys that just because you are ignorant does not mean he is.
Nov 11, 2009 4:04 pm

[quote=saywhat] [quote=Wet_Blanket]

940



And his calls on SH I am sure are blasting into the stratosphere.

[/quote]


Meletio told me that during the last week 4 % decline he wrote covered calls against SH. down 2.8% now. not a big deal as he also bought DD at 33.20 and sold at 34.3. So net net he's even. The s& P level is 950 by the end of Nov. He told me to tell you guys that just because you are ignorant does not mean he is. [/quote]   Just like a gambler with a problem, the DIY option trader always makes out "even."  Very convenient that he did these trades when during that time he was saying the exact opposite (as in being heavy towards SH and picking up BTU in "the off chance.")
Nov 11, 2009 4:04 pm

So that means the S & P will have to drop over 15% for the month, which has happened exactly once in the past 20 years.

Nov 11, 2009 4:09 pm
Moraen:

So that means the S & P will have to drop over 15% for the month, which has happened exactly once in the past 20 years.

  What a coincidence. That was the same amount of times saywhat...er...meletio saw a woman naked during that time frame.
Nov 11, 2009 4:12 pm
SometimesNowhere:

[quote=Moraen]So that means the S & P will have to drop over 15% for the month, which has happened exactly once in the past 20 years.

  What a coincidence. That was the same amount of times saywhat...er...meletio saw a woman naked during that time frame.[/quote]   Meletio is 20 years old???
Nov 11, 2009 4:12 pm

Nov 11, 2009 4:13 pm

In case you guys can’t see…you are in for a long slow water torture bleed. good luck !

Nov 11, 2009 4:21 pm

YOU SEE?!!?!?!? I GET MY INFO FROM A GUY WHO HAS A PH.D IN ENGLISH SUCKAS! HE’S A GENIUS! HE WAS IN IT LIKE PERMABEAR. IN FACT, HE MIGHT BE PERMABEAR. GENIUS!



YOU SHOULD ALL LISTEN TO HIM. FORGET THOSE PEOPLE AT YOUR FIRMS WITH PH.D’S IN ECONOMICS AND CFPS AND CFAS, THIS GUY HAS AN AAMS!



LET IT RAINS SUCKAS. 950 SP. YOU SUCKAS ARE GONNA DROWN IN THE RAIN!



RAINDROPS!

Nov 11, 2009 4:23 pm

The fake meletio doesn’t realize that it’s a chart of What has happened. It’s as simple as plotting numbers on a graph, no guess work involved

Nov 11, 2009 4:24 pm

I AM THE REAL MELETIO. I GET MY SOURCES FROM GUYS WITH PH.D’S IN ENGLISH. WOW. I’LL FIND IT AT ANOTHER SITE AND POST IT TOO.



LET IT RAIN!!!

Nov 11, 2009 4:29 pm

NOT TO MENTION THAT I CAN OVERLAY A CHART OF HISTORICAL TEMPERATURES THE LAST TWENTY YEARS AND THEN THE PREVIOUS TWENTY YEARS AND GUESS WHAT? THEY’LL BE MIRRORED. I’M A GENIUS SON!



LET IT RAIN!



I USE DATA LIKE STORMSHADOW USES A NINJA SWORD! I’M LIKE THE LION-O OF INVESTING!



THE SWORD OF OMENS HAS GIVEN ME SIGHT BEYOND SIGHT B*TCHES!



LET IT RAIN!

Nov 11, 2009 4:33 pm

SOUND FAMILIAR …7 years later the mkt was still going down !



October 29, 1929 – Stock Market Crashes!



BROKERS BELIEVE BOTTOM IS REACHED; Others Say a Sharp. Recovery Is in Order.

-October 30, 1929 (Glad they covered both sides of the story!)



“FISHER SAYS PRICES OF STOCKS ARE LOW; Quotations Have Not Caught Up With Real Values as Yet, He Declares. SEES NO CAUSE FOR SLUMP”

-October 22, 1929



“Time to Buy Stocks” John J. Raskob, one of the country’s leading industrial and political leaders

-October 30, 1929



Headline “INSURANCE HEADS URGE TO BUY STOCKS”

-October 30, 1929



ROCKEFELLER BUYS, ALLAYING ANXIETY; Elder Financier Says Business Status Does Not Warrant the Destruction of Values. October 31, 1929 (Remember Warren Buffet in Sept 2008?)



Stocks Up in Strong Rally; Rockefellers Big Buyers; Exchanges Close 2-1/2 Days

– New York Herald Tribune, October 31, 1929



SEES NEW BULL MARKET.; President of Philadelphia Stock Exchange Makes Predictions.

-November 22, 1929



BANKING CIRCLES SEE TURN FOR THE BETTER; Several Developments Cited as Presaging Recovery of the Stock Market. -November 15, 1929



HOOVER CALLS LEADERS OF NATION TO CONFER ON WAYS TO SPUR BUSINESS;

-November 16, 1929



Headline: The Quieting-Down of Wall Street–Aspects of Government’s Relief Projects.

-November 25, 1929



“The Government’s business is in sound condition.”

Andrew W. Mellon, Secretary of the Treasury

-December 5, 1929



RESERVE BANK AREAS FORECAST NEW YEAR

Despite the obvious slackening of the pace of business at the close of the year, leaders in banking and industry throughout the country maintain an optimistic attitude toward the prospects for 1930.

-January 1, 1930

Nov 11, 2009 4:55 pm

I just found a photo of meletoi on the internet



Nov 11, 2009 5:49 pm

[quote=mlgone]

your just a failed daytrader who is pissed at the world because you lost your Life Partners 5k IRRA.[/quote]





life partners 5k ira

funny

Nov 11, 2009 7:22 pm
SometimesNowhere:

[quote=Moraen]So that means the S & P will have to drop over 15% for the month, which has happened exactly once in the past 20 years.

  What a coincidence. That was the same amount of times saywhat...er...meletio saw a woman naked during that time frame.[/quote]

Mothers don't count.
Nov 11, 2009 7:25 pm
Dorkydoo:

[quote=SometimesNowhere][quote=Moraen]So that means the S & P will have to drop over 15% for the month, which has happened exactly once in the past 20 years.

  What a coincidence. That was the same amount of times saywhat...er...meletio saw a woman naked during that time frame.[/quote]

Mothers don't count.
[/quote]   Nor does his Vagina...     ZING!
Nov 11, 2009 7:30 pm

I don’t know who this meletio guy is but whoever posted those charts comparing 1929 to present is dead on . be very careful

Nov 11, 2009 7:35 pm
correction:

I don’t know who this meletio guy is but whoever posted those charts comparing 1929 to present is dead on . be very careful

  Nice try meletio.
Nov 11, 2009 7:36 pm

what?

Nov 11, 2009 7:48 pm

Somebody help. I’m new to this board and people are calling me meletio. is this some kind of private joke I don’t know about ?







Nov 11, 2009 9:54 pm
correction:

I don’t know who this meletio guy is but whoever posted those charts comparing 1929 to present is dead on . be very careful




hey mel
sup?
Nov 11, 2009 10:33 pm
Shania Twain:

[quote=correction] I don’t know who this meletio guy is but whoever posted those charts comparing 1929 to present is dead on . be very careful




hey mel
sup?[/quote]


What the hell is a mel ?
Nov 11, 2009 10:41 pm
correction:

Somebody help. I’m new to this board and people are calling me meletio. is this some kind of private joke I don’t know about ?



  You're a joke, I don't think it's private though.
Nov 11, 2009 10:47 pm
Jebediah:

[quote=correction]Somebody help. I’m new to this board and people are calling me meletio. is this some kind of private joke I don’t know about ?







You’re a joke, I don’t think it’s private though.[/quote]





You guys sure know how to welcome someone to this board. What the f***.

is this a conspiracy or something
Nov 11, 2009 11:05 pm

definition of an up mkt-a occasional event that occurs in which ordinary douchbags such as Jebediah get the impression that they know something

Nov 11, 2009 11:07 pm
correction:

[quote=Shania Twain] [quote=correction] I don’t know who this meletio guy is but whoever posted those charts comparing 1929 to present is dead on . be very careful




hey mel
sup?[/quote]


What the hell is a mel ?[/quote]

what is a mel?

it refers to a useless piece of dogsh!t or your basic coward.   also referred to as 'correction', 'downdowndown', 'saywhat', 'permabear', 'meletioforreal', 'meletio3', 'mr. sunshines', 'oitelem'.

oh, and a kid touching pervert who forages playgrounds for minors.

that's a mel
Nov 11, 2009 11:10 pm

Man you guys must really hate this meletio guy.

Nov 11, 2009 11:26 pm


it refers to a useless piece of dogsh!t or your basic coward.   also referred to as 'correction', 'downdowndown', 'saywhat', 'permabear', 'meletioforreal', 'meletio3', 'mr. sunshines', 'oitelem'.

oh, and a kid touching pervert who forages playgrounds for minors.

that's a mel[/quote]


Just thought I'd introduce myself. I've been a huge fan of these forums for a while. Lots of humor around here. So anyways, I've decided to make it official. Here's a few stats on me-

i guess you could say i'm 'legacy first union securities'. same building, same office, one full decade of (ahem) service, lots of kool-aid, lots of debt

i'm not a million dollar producer by far.

my production is down. way down, but i'm hopeful. i'm winning..


I don't know what you beef is with this mel guy, but If I were you in the same seat for 10 years not a million dollar producer by far, and had lots of debt,,,id either get off this board and get to work or get a knew job.

Nov 11, 2009 11:51 pm

^^you’re a poser…get lost perv boy

Nov 11, 2009 11:54 pm
Mr. Sunshine:

^^you’re a poser…get lost perv boy




no thanks I enjoy bugging you because it's seems to really get you riled up
Nov 12, 2009 12:41 am
correction:

[quote=Mr. Sunshine] ^^you’re a poser…get lost perv boy




no thanks I enjoy bugging you because it's seems to really get you riled up[/quote]

not riled up at all, Meletio, it's just fun reading how you acknowledge all your flaws. have you ever considered any bipolar meds? or anti-psychotics?
Nov 12, 2009 12:56 am
Mr. Sunshine:

[quote=correction] [quote=Mr. Sunshine] ^^you’re a poser…get lost perv boy




no thanks I enjoy bugging you because it's seems to really get you riled up[/quote]

not riled up at all, Meletio, it's just fun reading how you acknowledge all your flaws. have you ever considered any bipolar meds? or anti-psychotics? [/quote]

No meds needed. Why do you keep calling me meletio ?
Talk about needing Meds. It's very strange that everyone thinks I'm
some guy named meletio. However, I have read some of his post and he seems
to have a tremendous amount of knowledge. Maybe you guys are just
jealous.   
Nov 12, 2009 1:21 am

mel,

ur intial all-in short 'I knew it" call at spx 1040 ain’t doing to good.



hpq monster blow out number

a little takeover just for kicks

bust through 08 gap (tarp times) {man, that shti sucked. down 300 like every mf day)



I have a feeling we are close to a greed capitulation (I GOTTA GET IN) F the shorts monster move up here.



So much cash on sidelines   

U see trim tabs?   the small guy has not ever SNIFFED this run (US equities net OUTFLOWS)

we could see a plus 500 hundy day



the CASH is KILLING people.   “whats my money market paying?” well its .3%

bwahahhahahahahahahhahahahahahahhaha



fund managers in cash   so screwed.



Cabot (my hero) turned off yellow flag



100-150 SPX so fast your head will spin



this is a wonderful thing



BRIC



buy strength.



Nov 12, 2009 1:52 am

[quote=Shania Twain] mel,

ur intial all-in short 'I knew it" call at spx 1040 ain’t doing to good.



hpq monster blow out number

a little takeover just for kicks

bust through 08 gap (tarp times) {man, that shti sucked. down 300 like every mf day)



I have a feeling we are close to a greed capitulation (I GOTTA GET IN) F the shorts monster move up here.



So much cash on sidelines   

U see trim tabs?   the small guy has not ever SNIFFED this run (US equities net OUTFLOWS)

we could see a plus 500 hundy day



the CASH is KILLING people.   “whats my money market paying?” well its .3%

bwahahhahahahahahahhahahahahahahhaha



fund managers in cash   so screwed.



Cabot (my hero) turned off yellow flag



100-150 SPX so fast your head will spin



this is a wonderful thing



BRIC



buy strength.



[/quote]





Hp down in after hours. all good news is baked in the cake. Mkt is tired …the entire month on Nov has been up on pathetic volume,

Only big volume days are when it goes down. mkt at 17 times forward earnings that don’t exist. The only reason companies are beating numbers is the numbers were too low. It’s a new world twain.

read this.





Stock markets around the world are off nearly 50% from their 2007 highs. The credit markets have mostly frozen. The U.S. financial services industry is a shadow of its former self, causing severe disruptions in the operations of the global financial infrastructure. Losses on mortgaged-backed securities and other debt products tied to U.S. consumers have blown gaping holes in the balance sheets of the largest banks worldwide and have even bankrupted entire countries. Unfortunately, the pain is far from over. In fact, it is likely just beginning.



We are currently experiencing the rumblings of a global economic realignment which reflects the realities of wealth creation and dissipation that have evolved over the past three decades. Although most modern economists are completely unaware, wealth is created through savings, investment, and production. Wealth is destroyed by borrowing for uneconomic purposes and by spending on goods and services that produce no long-term benefit.



Living standards are supposed to rise where wealth is produced and to dissipate where it is destroyed. Like gravity, these forces can only be overcome through tremendous effort. The accumulation of trillions of dollars in U.S. budget and trade deficits, and a corresponding swell in foreign exchange reserves held by Asian central banks, have been the mechanisms which have, thus far, maintained the status quo. But, given the dangerous imbalances these policies create, the global commitment cannot endure perpetually.



The crisis had its roots in the easy monetary policies pursued by the Alan Greenspan-led Federal Reserve, and the strategic decisions of the Asian governments to support the value of the dollar through unlimited lending to the United States. The result was a massive misallocation of resources that inflated bubbles in the U.S. housing and equities markets.



An economic realignment that reflects underlying economic realities will gain momentum in the coming years. I feel strongly that investors who recognize this trend have the ability to position their portfolios in order to maintain their wealth.



Despite a 50% decline in the U.S. equities markets since the end of 2007, we believe that U.S. stocks remain substantially overvalued given the likely declines in earnings that have yet to be realized by U.S. corporations. As such, we are bearish on the broad U.S. stock market and only find value in certain carefully selected U.S. equities: those companies that are export-oriented and/or commodities-based, primarily in the mining and energy sectors.



Although the nominal declines in U.S. stocks may be arrested by the ongoing bailouts and stimuli, the real value of the assets will nonetheless decline with the resulting inflation. This phenomenon will confuse lay investors, and probably most pundits, into believing that a recovery is underway. Our analysts will be indexing any nominal recovery against realistic inflation figures to make investment decisions based upon real economic trends.





Keep riding your momentum train just like they did in the dot com bubble. the weak dollar is inflating everything and when it pops you will be out of a job.





S & P 950 by the end of Nov 09…

Meletio told me to write all this



    





Nov 12, 2009 1:54 am

One more thin Twain. If you get a chance read all the post from the real meletio the fake meletio and everyone involved in the back and forth comments. It would make a great SNL skit. I read it to my wife and it’s really quite hilarious.

Nov 12, 2009 1:56 am
correction:

One more thin Twain. If you get a chance read all the post from the real meletio the fake meletio and everyone involved in the back and forth comments. It would make a great SNL squit. I read it to my wife and it’s really quite hilarious.

    Before or after you filled her with air?  She is not saying ohhhhh, her lips are like that for a different reason.
Nov 12, 2009 2:07 am
Jebediah:

[quote=correction]One more thin Twain. If you get a chance read all the post from the real meletio the fake meletio and everyone involved in the back and forth comments. It would make a great SNL squit. I read it to my wife and it’s really quite hilarious.







Before or after you filled her with air? She is not saying ohhhhh, her lips are like that for a different reason.[/quote]





Speaking of air …looks like jebediah’s wife swallowed a little too much air



Nov 12, 2009 2:34 am

a wide array of sectors, including banks, REITs, Telecom and utilities, are lagging badly and remain beneath their October highs. Wilshire 5,000 and Russell 2,000

  Fully 70 percent of the Dow 30 components have yet to accompany the index to a new recovery high above the October 21 extreme. So less than 1/3 of the Dow’s stocks have dragged the index to new bear-market rally highs.   The NASDAQ Composite is stronger than the secondary indexes, but it too has not confirmed the Dow and S&P push above the October 21 highs.   We are coming to an end. Manipulation will be lucky to last through year end. That is all this mkt. is...MANIPULATION with a capital "M"
Nov 12, 2009 2:39 am

[quote=howboutshoeshine]a wide array of sectors, including banks, REITs, Telecom and utilities, are lagging badly and remain beneath their October highs. Wilshire 5,000 and Russell 2,000

  Fully 70 percent of the Dow 30 components have yet to accompany the index to a new recovery high above the October 21 extreme. So less than 1/3 of the Dow’s stocks have dragged the index to new bear-market rally highs.   The NASDAQ Composite is stronger than the secondary indexes, but it too has not confirmed the Dow and S&P push above the October 21 highs.   We are coming to an end. Manipulation will be lucky to last through year end. That is all this mkt. is...MANIPULATION with a capital "M"[/quote] "If I just buy when you say sell my clients would be making so much money..."
Nov 12, 2009 3:17 am
correction:

One more thin Twain. If you get a chance read all the post from the real meletio the fake meletio and everyone involved in the back and forth comments. It would make a great SNL skit. I read it to my wife and it’s really quite hilarious.



I know.   

She loved it.

I showed her some of it a few nights ago.
Nov 12, 2009 3:36 am

[quote=iceco1d] Shania,My friendly words to you, are to tread lightly. Truthfully, there are many parts of what fellatio just posted that I can agree with; or at least acknowledge the possibility of those scenarios playing out over the next few years. Only time will tell - there are far too many parts for anyone to know exactly what is going to happen. I like your enthusiasm Shania; just don’t get carried away.

[/quote]



Crowd is ALWAYS wrong in this game.



In 26 years i have NEVER seen so many who hate this bull.

have never seen SO many people convinced it HAS to go down.



Always remember,



if everyone a bear



aint no one left to sell…



I think the classic sentiment numbers are more bullish the then surface numbers.



   Look at Investers Intellegence. i think it was 44% bulls this week BUT if you read EVERYONE has a qualifier. Its nervous bulls who really dont have conviction.



stay invested.   BRIC buy the power names with good charts



The day Ben changes the lingo in the fed statement to start raising rates…you can trim some.



SPX might be 1400ish by then



THE CROWD IS ALWAYS WRONG.



July 08 to Mar 09 the market TRAINED people to be afraid.

That cash was king.



the TRAP was too much cash.



This aint 37 or 75



its 1982



BRIC   THE REAL STORY    



BILLIONS MORE PEOPLE OPERATING IN FREE MARKETS.



THE INDUSTRIAL REVEVOLUTION TIMES 1000



obama, subprime, us consumer etc all astrisks in history



bric is the REAL STORY



world changed nov 20, 2008







Nov 12, 2009 3:40 am

[quote=correction] [



[/quote]



dude thats funny

Nov 12, 2009 4:21 am
mlgone:

the funnier thing is he scanned it from his wedding album



If you want ,I can scan some pics from my bachelor party. dude, your wife can dance ! Let me know.
Nov 12, 2009 4:29 am

[quote=mlgone] Meletio your such a tool I gotta admit it’s fun to kill you everynight.





easymoney[/quote]



why do you guys keep calling me meletio. It’s flattering but I don’t get it

Nov 12, 2009 4:51 am

[quote=mlgone] cause your gay. Meletio is gay. Your post suck. Meletio post suck. Your an idiot. Meletio is an idiot. Your a permabear. Meletio is a permabear. You are a failed FA. Meletio is a failed FA. Your market calls are wrong. Meletio market calls are wrong. You have a new sign on name everyday. Meletio has a new sign on name everyday.





I am going to stop now because even you Meletio realize your an pathetic idiot and failed FA who is pissed he lost all his Life Partners 5k IRRA on SDS.



Dumbarse have another lonely c***tail[/quote]



tell your sister goodnight for me !

Nov 12, 2009 12:47 pm

Walmart’s setting the tone for the start of something very ugly.

Hope your ready Twain.

Also Mr. Sunshine and Jebediah…it’s time to get up out of bed help each other get showered and get to work !

Nov 12, 2009 3:13 pm

THAT’S RIGHT SUCKAS!  S & P 950 BY THE END OF THE MONTH.  BLACK FRIDAY IS GONNA BE BLEEDING RED LIKE A SUMB*TCH.  AWWWWW YEEEEEAAAAH! 

WAL-MART IS TAKING A PLAY FROM APPLE’S PLAYBOOK AND DOWNPLAYING NUMBERS, BUT WHATEV, I’M GONNA BE KILLING IT ON MY SHORT’S.

WHO CARES IF THE MARKET IS UP TODAY AND UNEMPLOYMENT RATE IS GOING DOWN.  IT’S STILL RAINING.  IT’S STILL GONNA RAIN ACATS ON YOU SUCKAS!

I’M LIKE LION - O, EXCEPT I’M MELETI-O.  I GOTS THE SWORD OF OMENS AND AND I CAN SEE THE FUTURE.

LET IT RAIN!

Nov 12, 2009 3:28 pm
meletoi:

THAT’S RIGHT SUCKAS!  S & P 950 BY THE END OF THE MONTH.  BLACK FRIDAY IS GONNA BE BLEEDING RED LIKE A SUMB*TCH.  AWWWWW YEEEEEAAAAH! 

WAL-MART IS TAKING A PLAY FROM APPLE’S PLAYBOOK AND DOWNPLAYING NUMBERS, BUT WHATEV, I’M GONNA BE KILLING IT ON MY SHORT’S.

WHO CARES IF THE MARKET IS UP TODAY AND UNEMPLOYMENT RATE IS GOING DOWN.  IT’S STILL RAINING.  IT’S STILL GONNA RAIN ACATS ON YOU SUCKAS!

I’M LIKE LION - O, EXCEPT I’M MELETI-O.  I GOTS THE SWORD OF OMENS AND AND I CAN SEE THE FUTURE.

LET IT RAIN!

    This sh*t never gets old.
Nov 12, 2009 4:17 pm
WHAT INVESTORS SHOULD KNOW Picks & Pans | Stock Blog
Current DateTime: 07:32:35 12 Nov 2009
LinksList Documentid: 26720172 Why Stronger Chinese Yuan Would Benefit US Investors What Do You Know About Buffett and Gates? Charts: Dow Set for Steady Trip to 11,600 3 'Clear Sailing' Mid-Caps For Investors: Strategist Market Tips: US Stocks Not Overvalued - Pick 'Em Up Cramer: Buy This New Gold ETF This is a bull everyone hates?????? Everyone loves this BULLsh!t, not hates. Also, bullishishness is at 93%!!!! What are you talking about????
Nov 12, 2009 4:21 pm
mlgone:

stay short.  It seems to be working for you

  stay long, it has worked for you in the last DECADE.
Nov 12, 2009 4:25 pm
howboutshoeshine:

[quote=mlgone]stay short. It seems to be working for you



stay long, it has worked for you in the last DECADE.[/quote]





exactly ! the lost decade will turn into two decades
Nov 12, 2009 4:30 pm

[quote=howboutshoeshine]a wide array of sectors, including banks, REITs, Telecom and utilities, are lagging badly and remain beneath their October highs. Wilshire 5,000 and Russell 2,000

  Fully 70 percent of the Dow 30 components have yet to accompany the index to a new recovery high above the October 21 extreme. So less than 1/3 of the Dow’s stocks have dragged the index to new bear-market rally highs.   The NASDAQ Composite is stronger than the secondary indexes, but it too has not confirmed the Dow and S&P push above the October 21 highs.   We are coming to an end. Manipulation will be lucky to last through year end. That is all this mkt. is...MANIPULATION with a capital "M"[/quote]   I love that this post clearly states that the REAL market is not participating and I get.................nevermind.
Nov 12, 2009 4:31 pm

ASSET ALLOCATION CANNOT POSSIBLY WORK, SINCE PEOPLE HAVE TWO, EVEN THREE TIMES MORE MONEY THAN THEY HAD BEFORE.  ONLY PEOPLE WHO ARE SHORT WILL MAKE MONEY.  EVER.

WE ARE GENIUSES.  AND WHEN THE MARKET CRASHES AGAIN, YOU SUCKAS WILL SEE IT RAIN DOWN LIKE MONSOON, "BOOM!  EXPLOSION, OVERPOWERIN’, OVER THE COMPETITION, I’M TOWERING…"

I KNOW YOU THINK JUST BECAUSE YOUR CLIENTS MADE MONEY THAT IT’S OK TO BE LONG.  ACTIVE MANAGEMENT SUCKS TOO.  ONLY BEING SHORT IS GOOD. 

ACTUALLY BUYING THINGS CHEAP DOESN’T WORK EITHER.

LET IT RAIN!

SWORD OF OMENS GIVE ME SIGHT BEYOND SIGHT!  I LOVE VOLTRON, ESPECIALLY THE YOUNG VOLTRON AND THE YOUNG LION-O.

Nov 12, 2009 4:32 pm
mlgone:

actually has.  But I don’t stay long… I anticipate and trade the market.  Reallocate, exchange etc.  I don’t do the buy and hold.   Grasp that

  IMPOSSIBLE, rookie
Nov 12, 2009 4:33 pm

ALSO, I WANT TO POINT OUT THAT IF THE DOW 30 IS NOT DOING IT THEN THE MARKET IS OUT OF LUCK.  IT IS THE “REAL” MARKET.  FORGET ALL OF THE OTHER COMPANIES.

LET IT RAIN!!

Nov 12, 2009 4:33 pm
mlgone:

actually has. But I don’t stay long… I anticipate and trade the market. Reallocate, exchange etc. I don’t do the buy and hold. Grasp that




yeh right
Nov 12, 2009 4:36 pm

early 06 dollar low is toast.  soon

Nov 12, 2009 4:38 pm
meletoi:

ALSO, I WANT TO POINT OUT THAT IF THE DOW 30 IS NOT DOING IT THEN THE MARKET IS OUT OF LUCK.  IT IS THE “REAL” MARKET.  FORGET ALL OF THE OTHER COMPANIES.

LET IT RAIN!!

  fck the DOW, although it too is failing. WIlshire 5,000, Russell 2,000. Do you know what those numbers stand for?
Nov 12, 2009 4:40 pm

[quote=Shania Twain]

early 06 dollar low is toast.  soon

[/quote]   With 3% world bullishness, I doubt it!
Nov 12, 2009 4:47 pm
mlgone:

down 15% last year in a total asset deflation sell off. Up 20.5% as of yesterday in a 45/55 E/FI split with 23% international. Modertly conservation portfolio. Taking less than half the risk of the s&p and returning more. And that’s only one. go away




Quick wake up, your alarm clock is going off
Nov 12, 2009 4:51 pm

[quote=mlgone]

down 15% last year in a total asset deflation sell off.  Up 20.5% as of yesterday in a 45/55 E/FI split with 23% international.  Modertly conservation portfolio. Taking less than half the risk of the s&p and returning more.  And that's only one.  go away

[/quote]   I believe you. down 15% with no hedge, you are smarter than I thought
Nov 12, 2009 4:53 pm
mlgone:

I give you the allocation to back test…but then again I like you stupid



you're not that good. wake up
Nov 12, 2009 6:54 pm
Mr. Sunshine:

[quote=correction] [quote=Shania Twain] [quote=correction] I don’t know who this meletio guy is but whoever posted those charts comparing 1929 to present is dead on . be very careful




hey mel
sup?[/quote]


What the hell is a mel ?[/quote]

what is a mel?

it refers to a useless piece of dogsh!t or your basic coward.   also referred to as 'correction', 'downdowndown', 'saywhat', 'permabear',
'meletioforreal', 'meletio3', 'mr. sunshines', 'oitelem'.

oh, and a kid touching pervert who forages playgrounds for minors.

that's a mel[/quote]




Sunshine's new business card. Clients please enter thru backdoor

Nov 13, 2009 2:49 am

correction, meletio, meletoi, whatever, etc.

Dude, I get it. you  like to fck with people. Let's be real though, at some point you believed in what you said here. Get back to that. This dumb sh!t you're doing now only proves lack of intelligence. You're not an idiot.
Nov 13, 2009 3:02 am

Why does anyone who is negative on the mkt on this forum get abused ?

Nov 13, 2009 3:04 am

hey mel



bears/frisco game not on TV here

really pisses me off

Nov 13, 2009 3:11 am



Check out Doug Cass' comments on cnbc.com. He's very negative now. Thinks investors in are in fantasy land. He supposedly called the mkt bottom in March
Nov 13, 2009 3:24 am
muttley:




Check out Doug Cass’ comments on cnbc.com. He’s very negative now. Thinks investors in are in fantasy land. He supposedly called the mkt bottom in March

He never went long and has been short since April..Just another example of how CNBC manipulates reality.
Nov 13, 2009 4:08 am

I was about to respond to you Fritz, but first I checked out some of your previous post. Your a joke…get lost

Nov 13, 2009 4:09 am
muttley:

I was about to debate with you Fritz, but first I checked out some of your previous post. You a clown…get lost

go visit the cramer post and watch his last year on cnbc..real straight shooter.
Nov 13, 2009 12:24 pm

[quote=howboutshoeshine]correction, meletio, meletoi, whatever, etc.

Dude, I get it. you  like to fck with people. Let's be real though, at some point you believed in what you said here. Get back to that. This dumb sh!t you're doing now only proves lack of intelligence. You're not an idiot.[/quote]

FIRST OF ALL, I AM THE REAL MELETI-O.  SECOND OF ALL, HOW DARE YOU SAY I'M NOT AN IDIOT?!

I HAVE SCREWED UP EVERY CALL I'VE MADE.  I'VE LOST NEARLY EIGHTY DOLLARS SHORTING THE MARKET.

I GET MY INFORMATION FROM GUYS WHO MAJORED IN ENGLISH AND BECAME MARKET EXPERTS BY WATCHING TV, PROBABLY BECAUSE THAT'S HOW I LEARNED TO BE WITH LITTLE BOYS (LAW AND ORDER: SVU ANYBODY).

I KNOW YOU THINK YOU ARE TOUGH.  "I'M A VIRTUAL BADASS.  BLAHBLAHBLAH!".

BULLSH*T!

LET IT RAIN SON.  LET IT RAAAAAAAAAAAAAAIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIINNNNNNNNNNNNNA!
Nov 13, 2009 1:37 pm

[quote=fritz] [

He never went long and has been short since April…Just another example of how CNBC manipulates reality.[/quote]





Is that true fritz?    Cass did make an awesome call the week fo the bottom.   he was really short?
Nov 13, 2009 2:34 pm

[quote=Shania Twain] [quote=fritz] [

He never went long and has been short since April..Just another example of how CNBC manipulates reality.[/quote]


Is that true fritz?    Cass did make an awesome call the week fo the bottom.   he was really short?[/quote] If you listened to his bottom call very carefully, he thought it was coming in the "next week" (was looking for a crash bottom, which never came) , it happened the next day.  Dont think he ever really got super long.  Then it shot up fast, he started to short a little, more as a hedge.  Then got very aggressive in the summer.  His results for Q-3 show he was short heavily.  He has been all in short for a couple months.
Nov 13, 2009 2:58 pm

bad consumer sentiment numbers

Nov 13, 2009 6:54 pm

THAT’S RIGHT SUCKAS!  CONSUMER SENTIMENT IS DOWN. WATCH IT RAIN DOWN AS THE MARKET ERASES THE LOSSES FROM YESTERDAY.  RAIN DOWN THE PAIN AND ACATS.  IT’S COMING.  ONLY TEN BUSINESS DAYS LEFT BEFORE S & P 950 PUNKS!

THINK ABOUT IT.  THE MARKET ONLY HAS TO DROP 1.5% EVERY DAY FOR IT TO RAIN ON YOU FOOLS!

I MEAN, THAT MUST HAVE HAPPENED AT LEAST 10 TIMES IN THE LAST 20 YEARS.  TEN DAYS STRAIGHT OF 1.5% DROPPING.  I’M SURE I HAVE A GRAPH.

HOLD ON:  NOPE.  BUT I’M SURE I’LL FIND ONE ON THE MOTLEY FOOL OR DR.SHORT, THE ENGLISH PROFESSOR.

SUCKAS!

LET IT RAIN!


Nov 13, 2009 7:19 pm

[quote=meletoi] THAT’S RIGHT SUCKAS! CONSUMER SENTIMENT IS DOWN. WATCH IT RAIN DOWN AS THE MARKET ERASES THE LOSSES FROM YESTERDAY. RAIN DOWN THE PAIN AND ACATS. IT’S COMING. ONLY TEN BUSINESS DAYS LEFT BEFORE S & P 950 PUNKS!THINK ABOUT IT. THE MARKET ONLY HAS TO DROP 1.5% EVERY DAY FOR IT TO RAIN ON YOU FOOLS!I MEAN, THAT MUST HAVE HAPPENED AT LEAST 10 TIMES IN THE LAST 20 YEARS. TEN DAYS STRAIGHT OF 1.5% DROPPING. I’M SURE I HAVE A GRAPH.HOLD ON: NOPE. BUT I’M SURE I’LL FIND ONE ON THE MOTLEY FOOL OR DR.SHORT, THE ENGLISH PROFESSOR.SUCKAS!LET IT RAIN!

[/quote]



great call. things really look bad.

horrible downside follow through after yesterdays swoon



ahahhahahahahahahahahahah



you bears get HOURS to be right funny



spx closes over 1100ish today



next week gonna really be fun

Nov 16, 2009 3:13 pm

1110 on spx this AM my bear loser friends

08 gap   nothing till 1200   maybe a 500 pt plus up day this week   ca       pit            u       lat        ion   keep shortin em hold your cash   they come take your house   a wonderful thing  
Nov 16, 2009 8:08 pm

Hey what was the target for the S&P at the end of November again?

I keep forgetting.

Nov 23, 2009 3:04 pm
spx 1111   bye bye oct 08 gap 1130 OB before u watch lions get beat on tday
Nov 23, 2009 3:34 pm

[quote=Shania Twain]

spx 1111



bye bye oct 08 gap

1130 OB before u watch lions get beat on tday[/quote]





bubble.jpg1024×912
Nov 23, 2009 5:09 pm

It’s time to celebrate if you live in America:

1. Our currency is in a free fall

2. Our home values are still in a decline

3. anyone that owns commercial property is seeing that value decrease

4. Food prices, health care and fuel prices are exploding as is Tuition

5. Wages are stagnant and have been for years

6. Unemployment is in reality over 17 %

7. The right wing fanatic Christian freaks are everywhere

9. corruption on wall street is at record levels

10. banks don’t lend money anymore b/c of the crap on the books

11. We are stuck in two wars that can’t be won

12. Iceco1d is a pussy



With all this good news out there lets go buy some stocks !!!

Nov 23, 2009 6:04 pm

keeping shorting gld

keep buying usd

keep holding your cash



ice is the man

Nov 23, 2009 6:09 pm

[quote=Shania Twain] keeping shorting gld

keep buying usd

keep holding your cash



ice is the man[/quote]





Keep shorting the dollar

Keep investing your cash

The lower I can buy the sh, or sds the happier I will be

I have unlimited cash !!!





Ice is melting

Nov 23, 2009 6:15 pm

Of course, you are still right.

Nov 23, 2009 6:16 pm
Wet_Blanket:

Of course, you are still right.




You got it
Nov 23, 2009 7:19 pm
BOSS:

[quote=Wet_Blanket] Of course, you are still right.




You got it [/quote]

I see.  He's one of those trolls.  An idiot dressed up like a troll.  He could at least get creative.
Nov 23, 2009 11:12 pm

I think it would be interesting to see what would happen in real life if this “ice” fellow met this “boss” fellow…

Nov 23, 2009 11:14 pm
fireh0t:

I think it would be interesting to see what would happen in real life if this “ice” fellow met this “boss” fellow…




i'd kick his ass
Nov 23, 2009 11:16 pm

You should get ahold of him and arrange that...

Nov 23, 2009 11:16 pm

I don’t. I’d hate to see iceco1d go to jail because he beat the crap out of a basement living mommas boy.

Nov 23, 2009 11:18 pm

That would certainly be a shame! 

Nov 23, 2009 11:22 pm

I’ll tell you what. I’ll post an address. You both meet there at a time of my choosing. I’ll post the video on a YouTube private page. Game?

Nov 23, 2009 11:35 pm
Magician:

I’ll tell you what. I’ll post an address. You both meet there at a time of my choosing. I’ll post the video on a YouTube private page. Game?



Who are you? why are posting all of the sudden ? and should I kick your ass as well? chump
Nov 23, 2009 11:41 pm

I just spoke to my buddy Meletio and he wanted me to remind all of you that you are all white collar criminals who work for firms who are out to screw the public. 3 % managed account fees, 5% VA commissions, end of the month churning of convertible bonds with two points in them, Unit trust with a 1.9 back end charge. It’s a shame. how can you guys look yourselves in the mirror when you whole reason for being in business is to slowly turns your clients money into your own. SAD SAD

Nov 23, 2009 11:54 pm
BOSS:

I just spoke to my buddy Meletio and he wanted me to remind all of you that you are all white collar criminals who work for firms who are out to screw the public. 3 % managed account fees, 5% VA commissions, end of the month churning of convertible bonds with two points in them, Unit trust with a 1.9 back end charge. It’s a shame. how can you guys look yourselves in the mirror when you whole reason for being in business is to slowly turns your clients money into your own. SAD SAD

    Holy crap!!  When did we get a paycut?  Did they just pass a new law or something?  If these rates posted are correct, I am screwed.  I can't go back to working 42 weeks a year.
Nov 24, 2009 12:22 am
BOSS:

[quote=Magician] I’ll tell you what. I’ll post an address. You both meet there at a time of my choosing. I’ll post the video on a YouTube private page. Game?



Who are you? why are posting all of the sudden ? and should I kick your ass as well? chump[/quote]

sure if you think you can. Why don't you use some of that investigative skill you've been showing and find me. I'll be here.

I notice you are scared of the throwdown. So, when can I expect you?
Nov 27, 2009 8:05 pm

Nov 28, 2009 4:11 pm

Dubai sends markets into turmoil



By Jennifer Hughes and David Oakley in London and Simeon,Kerr in Dubai



Published: November 27 2009 02:00 | Last updated: November 27 2009 02:00





turmoil…funny.



turmoil this.   



we turmoiling to new highs    wooooooooooooooo whoooooooooooooo



Nov 28, 2009 4:36 pm
mlgone:

yeah but I heard it’s only topless there




Yeh, you're right. I saw your wife there

fat-stripper-pole.jpg500×666 52.7 KB
Nov 28, 2009 5:01 pm

Wow funny you mention my wife. your not gonna believe this, but I have a picture here on my phone of my wife AND my college girl friend TOGETHER. can u believe it>?

they are still good friends even through they had that battle of trying to get me!!   

we all three still joke about it.   although its a bit sad. My ex-girl friend has not found anyone yet.



acm07_pressroom_faithshania_v_p.jpg480×695

Nov 29, 2009 4:14 am


The AAII Investor Sentiment Survey measures the percentage of individual investors who are bullish, bearish, and neutral on the stock market for the next six months; individuals are polled from the ranks of the AAII membership on a weekly basis. Only one vote per member is accepted in each weekly voting period.





Sentiment Survey





Bullish 31.7%

AAII’s members were asked to

finish this sentence:



I feel that the direction of the stock market over the next 6 months will be:

Bearish, Neutral, or Bullish.



Neutral 16.7%



Bearish 51.7%







Long-Term Average:

Bullish: 39%

Neutral: 31%

Bearish: 30%



Nov 29, 2009 5:06 am
AAII is a nonprofit organization that arms individual investors with the education and tools they need to build wealth. From stock investing to financial planning and retirement funding, AAII covers all your needs. this site is a JOKE!!! Funny post. If you want to know sentiment look around, boy genius.  Also, a poll of professionals is more telling or YOU could just turn on CNBC or bloomberg. The most you will here there is "correction" "double dip" "V shaped recovery" "sqare root shaped recovery" NOTHING about taking out lows. AGAIN, this is a ridiculous discussion. This bull within a secular bear is LOVED.
Nov 29, 2009 5:18 am

On Friday, many of the in-store deals were also
available online, causing some Web sites to overload as shoppers tried
to get deals without waiting in long, cold lines.

U.S. consumer spending and home sales rose more than expected in
October, while new claims for jobless benefits fell sharply last week,
suggesting the economic recovery was gaining traction.


More than a year after the economy’s collapse
began rattling shoppers, industry observers said Friday’s shopping
sprees offered a strong start to the holiday season.


U.S. consumer confidence edged higher in November after an unexpected
drop in October, with less consumers expressing doubt about the a
worsening jobs market, according to a report released on Tuesday.

Bookmark this thread.  Dow will hit 11,000 by the end of the year.

YEAH!  PARTY IN THE USA!!!

Nov 29, 2009 12:57 pm

[quote=howboutshoeshine]

















<TABLE cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=10 width=“100%” =/s/hmintroBG2.gif>





<FONT =hmIntroTxt2>AAII is a nonprofit organization that arms individual investors with the education and tools they need to build wealth. From stock investing to financial planning and retirement funding, AAII covers all your needs.



this site is a JOKE!!! Funny post. If you want to know sentiment look around, boy genius. Also, a poll of professionals is more telling or YOU could just turn on CNBC or bloomberg. The most you will here there is “correction” “double dip” “V shaped recovery” “sqare root shaped recovery” NOTHING about taking out lows. AGAIN, this is a ridiculous discussion. This bull within a secular bear is LOVED.[/quote]



actually, the “average joe” is EXACTLY what you want for the paradox of evaluating phychlology and the markets.



The “professionals” is investors intelligence which is neutral to bearish.    



And now i am going to agree with you on one thing.



You ARE correct on one thing.



A retest or violation of march low (666) is NOT on ANYONES radar.



That does bother me a tiny bit. Even the purist of techs (louise yamada types) call it THE bottom



(and she is much more in your bear camp thinking we are now in 1937)



she thinks we are still in teeth of secular bear beginning in 2000.



You have a valid point that other nasty bears (74,29 etc) had monster rallys that proved to be huge bear traps (74 came back to even).



BTW   AAII went to 79% bearish on the EXACT bottom (666).    This was the worst (best) reading EVER.   



that reading (plus VIX at 80) gave me the courage to sell govies for balanced accounts and do some other aggressive things that turned out to be huge.



predicting the market is obviously not an exact science but, if you dismiss extreme sentiment indicators as not valuable, your just flat wrong



look at aaii, investors intel, VIX etc and plot it behind the SPX.

the extremes are probably THE single most accurate indicator of major buy and sell points.
Nov 29, 2009 3:59 pm

You are VERY correct about extremes.

  At 74.2, the percentage of stock market bulls relative to the total of committed advisors is now the highest percentage since the October 2007 all-time high (76.0), ( investor intelligence)   ISE Sentiment Index has risen to 149.2, its most extreme since Primary wave 2 (circle) started in March. In fact, the only more extreme level since the October 2007 all-time market peak was on December 30 of last year when the 10-day average spiked to 154.83. That was just 4 market days before the January 6 high, which was the top of wave (4).
  US dollar has been 3% bullish since September 15th     The Daily Sentiment Index of gold traders has been above 90 percent bulls for 17 straight days, challenging the previous record streak of 20 days from November 5 to December 6, 2004, which resulted in the December 2004 high that remained intact for 9 months.     For all of these reasons, among the fact that it appears we are in a rapid decention, I believe this is a DEPRESSION not recession. Things are not better they are worse. The SPIN is out of control and people are STARTING to get pissed. I see things for what they are and it is B.A.D. out there. The market will suffer the consequences of the "change of world powers"  I will not be there to see it happen, whenever it happens.
Nov 29, 2009 4:47 pm

[quote=howboutshoeshine] You are VERY correct about extremes.



At 74.2, the percentage of stock market bulls relative to the total of committed advisors is now the highest percentage since the October 2007 all-time high (76.0), ( investor intelligence)



ISE Sentiment Index has risen to 149.2, its most extreme since Primary wave 2 (circle) started in March. In fact, the only more extreme level since the October 2007 all-time market peak was on December 30 of last year when the 10-day average spiked to 154.83. That was just 4 market days before the January 6 high, which was the top of wave (4).



US dollar has been 3% bullish since September 15th





The Daily Sentiment Index of gold traders has been above 90 percent bulls for 17 straight days, challenging the previous record streak of 20 days from November 5 to December 6, 2004, which resulted in the December 2004 high that remained intact for 9 months.





For all of these reasons, among the fact that it appears we are in a rapid decention, I believe this is a DEPRESSION not recession. Things are not better they are worse. The SPIN is out of control and people are STARTING to get pissed. I see things for what they are and it is B.A.D. out there. The market will suffer the consequences of the “change of world powers” I will not be there to see it happen, whenever it happens.[/quote]



Have fun with that DEPRESSION. This is not even close to a depression.



The two possible agreed upon definition of depressions are a sustained decline of 10% in GDP, or at least two years of a recession. Considering that with a positive GDP number, the clock has restarted, then we’re not even close. If next quarter has a positive GDP number, your depression thesis is shot.
Nov 29, 2009 8:17 pm

Magician,

  They won't know it's a depression until after the fact. I look at the world around me my friend and then make an educated guess ( hypothesis ) and then if I'm correct it is a fact. By the way .6% of GDP is always govt. programs although last quarter you had an additional 1.6% due to "special programs" How good do those numbers look now? I don't listen to what I'm told, I make my OWN opinions.
Nov 29, 2009 11:37 pm

dow futures up 40



dubai    funny

Dec 1, 2009 11:51 pm

The Decade of Emerging Markets





Out of 73 country equity indices that we track (that go back to the start of 2000),

just 17 are down during the current decade (starting 1/1/2000). Unfortunately, the US and five of the other G-7 countries are included in the

group of 17 losers.

The Ukraine has been the best performing country this decade with a gain of 1,445%.



Russia

has been the best performing BRIC country with a gain of 711%.



Canada has been the best performing G7 country,

while Japan has been the worst.



From a stock market standpoint, we saw emerging markets emerge in a big

way this decade, as developed nations stumbled pretty much across the board.



Dec 3, 2009 3:43 am

[quote=Shania Twain] [quote=howboutshoeshine]

















<TABLE cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=10 width=“100%” =/s/hmintroBG2.gif>





<FONT =hmIntroTxt2>AAII is a nonprofit organization that arms individual investors with the education and tools they need to build wealth. From stock investing to financial planning and retirement funding, AAII covers all your needs.



this site is a JOKE!!! Funny post. If you want to know sentiment look around, boy genius.  Also, a poll of professionals is more telling or YOU could just turn on CNBC or bloomberg. The most you will here there is “correction” “double dip” “V shaped recovery” “sqare root shaped recovery” NOTHING about taking out lows. AGAIN, this is a ridiculous discussion. This bull within a secular bear is LOVED.[/quote]



actually, the “average joe” is EXACTLY what you want for the paradox of evaluating phychlology and the markets.



The “professionals” is investors intelligence which is neutral to bearish.    



And now i am going to agree with you on one thing.



You ARE correct on one thing.



A retest or violation of march low (666) is NOT on ANYONES radar.



That does bother me a tiny bit. Even the purist of techs (louise yamada types) call it THE bottom



(and she is much more in your bear camp thinking we are now in 1937)



she thinks we are still in teeth of secular bear beginning in 2000.



You have a valid point that other nasty bears (74,29 etc) had monster rallys that proved to be huge bear traps (74 came back to even).



BTW   AAII went to 79% bearish on the EXACT bottom (666).    This was the worst (best) reading EVER.   



that reading (plus VIX at 80) gave me the courage to sell govies for balanced accounts and do some other aggressive things that turned out to be huge.



predicting the market is obviously not an exact science but, if you dismiss extreme sentiment indicators as not valuable, your just flat wrong



look at aaii, investors intel, VIX etc and plot it behind the SPX.

the extremes are probably THE single most accurate indicator of major buy and sell points.[/quote]

Shania, I agree with your reasoning here on extreme sentiment.  Check out the most recent investor intelligence survey numbers:

Date Published


Percent Bullish


Percent Bearish

<tr style=": rgb239, 239, 239 none repeat scroll 0% 0%; -moz--clip: -moz-initial; -moz--origin: -moz-initial; -moz--inline-policy: -moz-initial;"> <td align="center"> 12/02/09 </td> <td align="center"> 50 </td> <td align="center"> 16.7 </td> </tr> <tr style=": rgb255, 255, 255 none repeat scroll 0% 0%; -moz--clip: -moz-initial; -moz--origin: -moz-initial; -moz--inline-policy: -moz-initial;"> <td align="center"> 11/25/09 </td> <td align="center"> 50.6 </td> <td align="center"> 17.6 </td> </tr> <tr style=": rgb239, 239, 239 none repeat scroll 0% 0%; -moz--clip: -moz-initial; -moz--origin: -moz-initial; -moz--inline-policy: -moz-initial;"> <td align="center"> 11/18/09 </td> <td align="center"> 46.1 </td> <td align="center"> 21.3 </td> </tr> <tr style=": rgb255, 255, 255 none repeat scroll 0% 0%; -moz--clip: -moz-initial; -moz--origin: -moz-initial; -moz--inline-policy: -moz-initial;"> <td align="center"> 11/11/09 </td> <td align="center"> 44.4 </td> <td align="center"> 26.7 </td> </tr> <tr style=": rgb239, 239, 239 none repeat scroll 0% 0%; -moz--clip: -moz-initial; -moz--origin: -moz-initial; -moz--inline-policy: -moz-initial;"> <td align="center"> 11/04/09 </td> <td align="center"> 48.3 </td> <td align="center"> 24.7 </td> </tr> <tr style=": rgb255, 255, 255 none repeat scroll 0% 0%; -moz--clip: -moz-initial; -moz--origin: -moz-initial; -moz--inline-policy: -moz-initial;"> <td align="center"> 10/28/09 </td> <td align="center"> 48.3 </td> <td align="center"> 22.5 </td> </tr> <tr style=": rgb239, 239, 239 none repeat scroll 0% 0%; -moz--clip: -moz-initial; -moz--origin: -moz-initial; -moz--inline-policy: -moz-initial;"> <td align="center"> 10/21/09 </td> <td align="center"> 49.5 </td> <td align="center"> 23.1 </td> </tr> <tr style=": rgb255, 255, 255 none repeat scroll 0% 0%; -moz--clip: -moz-initial; -moz--origin: -moz-initial; -moz--inline-policy: -moz-initial;"> <td align="center"> 10/14/09 </td> <td align="center"> 47.2 </td> <td align="center"> 26.4 </td> </tr> <tr style=": rgb239, 239, 239 none repeat scroll 0% 0%; -moz--clip: -moz-initial; -moz--origin: -moz-initial; -moz--inline-policy: -moz-initial;"> <td align="center"> 10/07/09 </td> <td align="center"> 48.9 </td> <td align="center"> 24.4 </td> </tr> <tr style=": rgb255, 255, 255 none repeat scroll 0% 0%; -moz--clip: -moz-initial; -moz--origin: -moz-initial; -moz--inline-policy: -moz-initial;"> <td align="center"> 09/30/09 </td> <td align="center"> 50.6 </td> <td align="center"> 23.6 </td> </tr> <tr style=": rgb239, 239, 239 none repeat scroll 0% 0%; -moz--clip: -moz-initial; -moz--origin: -moz-initial; -moz--inline-policy: -moz-initial;"> <td align="center"> 09/23/09 </td> <td align="center"> 46.7 </td> <td align="center"> 24.4 </td> </tr> <tr style=": rgb255, 255, 255 none repeat scroll 0% 0%; -moz--clip: -moz-initial; -moz--origin: -moz-initial; -moz--inline-policy: -moz-initial;"> <td align="center"> 09/16/09 </td> <td align="center"> 47.8 </td> <td align="center"> 24.4 </td> </tr> <tr style=": rgb239, 239, 239 none repeat scroll 0% 0%; -moz--clip: -moz-initial; -moz--origin: -moz-initial; -moz--inline-policy: -moz-initial;"> <td align="center"> 09/09/09 </td> <td align="center"> 48.3 </td> <td align="center"> 23.6 </td> </tr> <tr style=": rgb255, 255, 255 none repeat scroll 0% 0%; -moz--clip: -moz-initial; -moz--origin: -moz-initial; -moz--inline-policy: -moz-initial;"> <td align="center"> 09/02/09 </td> <td align="center"> 50.6 </td> <td align="center"> 24.1 </td> </tr> <tr style=": rgb239, 239, 239 none repeat scroll 0% 0%; -moz--clip: -moz-initial; -moz--origin: -moz-initial; -moz--inline-policy: -moz-initial;"> <td align="center"> 08/26/09 </td> <td align="center"> 51.6 </td> <td align="center"> 19.8 </td> </tr> <tr style=": rgb255, 255, 255 none repeat scroll 0% 0%; -moz--clip: -moz-initial; -moz--origin: -moz-initial; -moz--inline-policy: -moz-initial;"> <td align="center"> 08/19/09 </td> <td align="center"> 48.3 </td> <td align="center"> 23.1 </td> </tr> <tr style=": rgb239, 239, 239 none repeat scroll 0% 0%; -moz--clip: -moz-initial; -moz--origin: -moz-initial; -moz--inline-policy: -moz-initial;"> <td align="center"> 08/12/09 </td> <td align="center"> 49.4 </td> <td align="center"> 21.3 </td> </tr> <tr style=": rgb255, 255, 255 none repeat scroll 0% 0%; -moz--clip: -moz-initial; -moz--origin: -moz-initial; -moz--inline-policy: -moz-initial;"> <td align="center"> 08/05/09 </td> <td align="center"> 47.2 </td> <td align="center"> 25.8 </td> </tr> <tr style=": rgb239, 239, 239 none repeat scroll 0% 0%; -moz--clip: -moz-initial; -moz--origin: -moz-initial; -moz--inline-policy: -moz-initial;"> <td align="center"> 07/29/09 </td> <td align="center"> 42.2 </td> <td align="center"> 31.1 </td> </tr> <tr style=": rgb255, 255, 255 none repeat scroll 0% 0%; -moz--clip: -moz-initial; -moz--origin: -moz-initial; -moz--inline-policy: -moz-initial;"> <td align="center"> 07/22/09 </td> <td align="center"> 36.7 </td> <td align="center"> 35.6
Now look at a chart of that tracks bullish and bearish sentiment over the last 4 years:


The last time we saw bearish sentiment this low was in July 2007, when the S&P was trading in the 1550 range, shortly before it hit it’s all time high.

I’m not normally a technical charts guy (I’m more interested in fundamentals), but your argument that this rally has not been embraced by the majority of market participants is dead wrong.

The bull side is very crowded trade right now. 





Dec 3, 2009 6:18 pm

Read the advisors comments that investors intel gives you.

reluctant bulls

II tops usually have 60 plus % bulls. raging bulls.



crowded bull trade?   are you serious?



trim tabs   NET outflows of equity fund after a 65% run?

are you kidding me?

has NEVER happened before



retail guy is NOT in this market-period.



The II 16 bear is real.



Im not buying it



look at july sell off



less the 10%    look at II number



21 to 40!!!    quickly



no one believes this rally



Dec 3, 2009 7:49 pm

[quote=Shania Twain]Read the advisors comments that investors intel gives you.

reluctant bulls

II tops usually have 60 plus % bulls. raging bulls.



crowded bull trade?   are you serious?



trim tabs   NET outflows of equity fund after a 65% run?

are you kidding me?

has NEVER happened before



retail guy is NOT in this market-period.



The II 16 bear is real.



Im not buying it



look at july sell off



less the 10%    look at II number



21 to 40!!!    quickly



no one believes this rally



[/quote]

Look at the BB ratio.  It’s 2.994!!!  That’s three times as many bulls as bears.  And guess what, it hasn’t been this high since… Oct 2007 when the S&P hit its all time high.

There is nothing to “buy”.  The market has gone extremely bullish. 

Dec 3, 2009 10:32 pm

short it brother

hold cash



thats why they play the games

Dec 3, 2009 11:28 pm

I’m holding cash, puts, a handful of high quality stock names (about 20%) and some muni bonds.  Running a couple currency plays too.  Think we’re going to see this USD carry trade unwind pretty soon.  Market close today was telling of the confidence in tomorrow’s employment numbers.  Do you have any hedges on?  I’m not trying to be a d***, but if this thing goes south, it’ll happen in a hurry.    

Dec 9, 2009 7:08 pm

From The Big Picture:

Albert Edwards of Société Générale makes the simple contrarian arguement that the low number of equity bears is a bad sign for equities:

“The current extremely low number of equity bears (the lowest since the market top of 2007 – see chart below), the likelihood is that the next leg of the long-term structural valuation bear market is closer than people might realise.”

Here is Edward’s chart:

>

click for larger graphic

Source: Datastream, SG Cross Asset Research

Dec 10, 2009 2:48 am

1280ish year end/mid jan.



ewz,pot,gfa,osh,abv,fdx,isrg,aapl etc



buy strength. sell weakness



IBD, cabot,carter



so many good charts



quit over thinking it.    going higher