A recent Illinois case that ruled unfavorably on the use of self-settled trusts, Rush Univ. Med. Center v. Sessions, ____ N.E. 2d ____, 2012 IL 112906, 2012 WL 4127261 (Ill, Sept. 20, 2012) (Rush  U), has raised eyebrows from some advisors and drawn yawns from others.  Some advisors have concluded that the use of a domestic self settled trust (DAPT) for residents of non-DAPT jurisdictions isn’t viable. Others have pointed out that the result in R

All access premium subscription

Your subscription will include 12 months of Trusts & Estates magazine and access to premium content on WealthManagement.com.

Hide comments

Comments

  • Allowed HTML tags: <em> <strong> <blockquote> <br> <p>

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
Publish